Development of Machine Learning Models to Predict Compressed Sward Height in Walloon Pastures Based on Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Meteorological Data Using Multiple Data Transformations
[en] Accurate information about the available standing biomass on pastures is critical for the adequate management of grazing and its promotion to farmers. In this paper, machine learning models are developed to predict available biomass expressed as compressed sward height (CSH) from readily accessible meteorological, optical (Sentinel-2) and radar satellite data (Sentinel-1). This study assumed that combining heterogeneous data sources, data transformations and machine learning methods would improve the robustness and the accuracy of the developed models. A total of 72,795 records of CSH with a spatial positioning, collected in 2018 and 2019, were used and aggregated according to a pixel-like pattern. The resulting dataset was split into a training one with 11,625 pixellated records and an independent validation one with 4952 pixellated records. The models were trained with a 19-fold cross-validation. A wide range of performances was observed (with mean root mean square error (RMSE) of cross-validation ranging from 22.84 mm of CSH to infinite-like values), and the four best-performing models were a cubist, a glmnet, a neural network and a random forest. These models had an RMSE of independent validation lower than 20 mm of CSH at the pixel-level. To simulate the behavior of the model in a decision support system, performances at the paddock level were also studied. These were computed according to two scenarios: either the predictions were made at a sub-parcel level and then aggregated, or the data were aggregated at the parcel level and the predictions were made for these aggregated data. The results obtained in this study were more accurate than those found in the literature concerning pasture budgeting and grassland biomass evaluation. The training of the 124 models resulting from the described framework was part of the realization of a decision support system to help farmers in their daily decision making.
Research center :
Centre Wallon de recherche agronomique
Disciplines :
Animal production & animal husbandry Environmental sciences & ecology
Author, co-author :
Nickmilder, Charles ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Biosystems Dynamics and Exchanges
Tedde, Anthony ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Modélisation et développement
Dufrasne, Isabelle ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Dpt. de gestion vétérinaire des Ressources Animales (DRA) > Nutrition des animaux domestiques
Lessire, Françoise ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Dpt. de gestion vétérinaire des Ressources Animales (DRA) > Nutrition des animaux domestiques
Tychon, Bernard ; Université de Liège - ULiège > DER Sc. et gest. de l'environnement (Arlon Campus Environ.) > Eau, Environnement, Développement
Curnel, Yannick; Centre Wallon de Recherches Agronomiques (CRA-W) > Productions Agricoles > Agriculture, Territoire et Intégration Technologique
Bindelle, Jérôme ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Ingénierie des productions animales et nutrition
Soyeurt, Hélène ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Modélisation et développement
Language :
English
Title :
Development of Machine Learning Models to Predict Compressed Sward Height in Walloon Pastures Based on Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Meteorological Data Using Multiple Data Transformations
Publication date :
01 February 2021
Journal title :
Remote Sensing
eISSN :
2072-4292
Publisher :
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Basel, Switzerland
Volume :
13
Issue :
3
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Name of the research project :
Roadstep
Funders :
DGA - Région wallonne. Direction générale de l'Agriculture [BE]
Hennessy, D.; Delaby, L.; van den Pol-van Dasselaar, A.; Shalloo, L. Increasing Grazing in Dairy Cow Milk Production Systems in Europe. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2443 [CrossRef]
Elgersma, A. Grazing increases the unsaturated fatty acid concentration of milk from grass-fed cows: A review of the contributing factors, challenges and future perspectives. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2015, 117, 1345–1369. [CrossRef]
Lessire, F.; Jacquet, S.; Veselko, D.; Piraux, E.; Dufrasne, I. Evolution of grazing practices in Belgian dairy farms: Results of two surveys. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3997. [CrossRef]
Cros, M.J.; Garcia, F.; Martin-Clouaire, R. SEPATOU: A Decision Support System for the Management of Rotational Grazing in a Dairy Production. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Information Technology in Agriculture, Bonn, Germany, 27–30 September 1999; pp. 549–557.
Amalero, E.G.; Ingua, G.L.; Erta, G.B.; Emanceau, P.L. A biophysical dairy farm model to evaluate rotational grazing management strategies. Agronomie 2003, 23, 407–418. [CrossRef]
Romera, A.J.; Beukes, P.; Clark, C.; Clark, D.; Levy, H.; Tait, A. Use of a pasture growth model to estimate herbage mass at a paddock scale and assist management on dairy farms. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2010, 74, 66–72. [CrossRef]
Romera, A.; Beukes, P.; Clark, D.; Clark, C.; Tait, A. Pasture growth model to assist management on dairy farms: Testing the concept with farmers. Grassl. Sci. 2013, 59, 20–29. [CrossRef]
Ruelle, E.; Hennessy, D.; Delaby, L. Development of the Moorepark St Gilles grass growth model (MoSt GG model): A predictive model for grass growth for pasture based systems. Eur. J. Agron. 2018, 99, 80–91. [CrossRef]
Moeckel, T.; Safari, H.; Reddersen, B.; Fricke, T.; Wachendorf, M. Fusion of ultrasonic and spectral sensor data for improving the estimation of biomass in grasslands with heterogeneous sward structure. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 98. [CrossRef]
Cudlín, O.; Hakl, J.; Hejcman, M.; Cudlín, P. The use of compressed height to estimate the yield of a differently fertilized meadow. Plant Soil Environ. 2018. 64, 76–81. [CrossRef]
Lussem, U.; Bolten, A.; Menne, J.; Gnyp, M.L.; Schellberg, J.; Bareth, G. Estimating biomass in temperate grassland with high resolution canopy surface models from UAV-based RGB images and vegetation indices. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2019, 13, 034525. [CrossRef]
Laca, E.A.; Demment, M.W.; Winckel, J.; Kie, J.G. Comparison of weight estimate and rising-plate meter methods to measure herbage mass of a mountain meadow. J. Range Manag. 1989, 42, 71–75. [CrossRef]
French, P.; O’Brien, B.; Shalloo, L. Development and adoption of new technologies to increase the efficiency and sustainability of pasture-based systems. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2015, 55, 931–935. [CrossRef]
MacAdam, J.; Hunt, S. Using a Rising Plate Meter to Determine Paddock Size for Rotational Grazing; Utah State University Extension Bulletin: Logan, UT, USA, 2015.
Gargiulo, J.; Clark, C.; Lyons, N.; de Veyrac, G.; Beale, P.; Garcia, S. Spatial and temporal pasture biomass estimation integrating electronic plate meter, planet cubesats and sentinel-2 satellite data. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3222. [CrossRef]
Wang, J.; Xiao, X.; Bajgain, R.; Starks, P.; Steiner, J.; Doughty, R.B.; Chang, Q. Estimating leaf area index and aboveground biomass of grazing pastures using Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat images. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2019, 154, 189–201. [CrossRef]
Hakl, J.; Hrevušová, Z.; Hejcman, M.; Fuksa, P. The use of a rising plate meter to evaluate lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) height as an important agronomic trait enabling yield estimation. Grass Forage Sci. 2012, 67, 589–596. [CrossRef]
Crémer, S. La Gestion des Prairies—Notes de Cours 2015–2016; Fourrages-mieux, Marche-en-Famenne: Marloie, Belgium, 2015; pp. 1–142.
Nakagami, K. A method for approximate on-farm estimation of herbage mass by using two assessments per pasture. Grass Forage Sci. 2016, 71, 490–496. [CrossRef]
Fricke, T.; Wachendorf, M. Combining ultrasonic sward height and spectral signatures to assess the biomass of legume-grass swards. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2013, 99, 236–247. [CrossRef]
Bareth, G.; Schellberg, J. Replacing Manual Rising Plate Meter Measurements with Low-cost UAV-Derived Sward Height Data in Grasslands for Spatial Monitoring. PFG J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. Geoinf. Sci. 2018, 86, 157–168. [CrossRef]
Legg, M.; Bradley, S. Ultrasonic Arrays for Remote Sensing of Pasture Biomass. Remote Sens. 2019, 12, 111. [CrossRef]
Rayburn, E.B.; Lozier, J.D.; Sanderson, M.A.; Smith, B.D.; Shockey, W.L.; Seymore, D.A.; Fultz, S.W. Alternative Methods of Estimating Forage Height and Sward Capacitance in Pastures Can Be Cross Calibrated. Forage Grazinglands 2007, 5, 1–6. [CrossRef]
Lopez diaz, J.; Gonzalez-rodriguez, A. Measuring grass yield by non-destructive methods. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53, 1689–1699. [CrossRef]
Cimbelli, A.; Vitale, V. Grassland height assessment by satellite images. Adv. Remote Sens. 2017, 6, 40–53. [CrossRef]
Ancin-Murguzur, F.J.; Taff, G.; Davids, C.; Tømmervik, H.; Mølmann, J.; Jørgensen, M. Yield estimates by a two-step approach using hyperspectral methods in grasslands at high latitudes. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 400. [CrossRef]
Zeng, L.; Chen, C. Using remote sensing to estimate forage biomass and nutrient contents at different growth stages. Biomass Bioenergy 2018, 115, 74–81. [CrossRef]
Tiscornia, G.; Baethgen, W.; Ruggia, A.; Do Carmo, M.; Ceccato, P. Can we Monitor Height of Native Grasslands in Uruguay with Earth Observation? Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1801. [CrossRef]
Michez, A.; Philippe, L.; David, K.; Sébastien, C.; Christian, D.; Bindelle, J. Can low-cost unmanned aerial systems describe the forage quality heterogeneity? Insight from a timothy pasture case study in southern Belgium. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1650. [CrossRef]
Borra-Serrano, I.; De Swaef, T.; Muylle, H.; Nuyttens, D.; Vangeyte, J.; Mertens, K.; Saeys, W.; Somers, B.; Roldán-Ruiz, I.; Lootens, P. Canopy height measurements and non-destructive biomass estimation of Lolium perenne swards using UAV imagery. Grass Forage Sci. 2019, 74, 356–369. [CrossRef]
Michez, A.; Lejeune, P.; Bauwens, S.; Lalaina Herinaina, A.A.; Blaise, Y.; Muñoz, E.C.; Lebeau, F.; Bindelle, J. Mapping and monitoring of biomass and grazing in pasture with an unmanned aerial system. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 473. [CrossRef]
Eastwood, C.R.; Dela Rue, B.T.; Gray, D.I. Using a ’network of practice’ approach to match grazing decision-support system design with farmer practice. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2017, 57, 1536–1542. [CrossRef]
McSweeney, D.; Coughlan, N.E.; Cuthbert, R.N.; Halton, P.; Ivanov, S. Micro-sonic sensor technology enables enhanced grass height measurement by a Rising Plate Meter. Inf. Process. Agric. 2019, 6, 279–284. [CrossRef]
Jouven, M.; Carrère, P.; Baumont, R. Model predicting dynamics of biomass, structure and digestibility of herbage in managed permanent pastures. 1. Model description. Grass Forage Sci. 2006, 61, 112–124. [CrossRef]
Sándor, R.; Ehrhardt, F.; Brilli, L.; Carozzi, M.; Recous, S.; Smith, P.; Snow, V.; Soussana, J.F.; Dorich, C.D.; Fuchs, K.; et al. The use of biogeochemical models to evaluate mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from managed grasslands. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 642, 292–306. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Brisson, N.; Mary, B.; Ripoche, D.; Jeuffroy, M.H.; Ruget, F.; Nicoullaud, B.; Gate, P.; Devienne-Barret, F.; Antonioletti, R.; Durr, C.; et al. STICS: A generic model for the simulation of crops and their water and nitrogen balances. I. Theory and parameterization applied to wheat and corn. Agronomie 1998, 18, 311–346. [CrossRef]
McDonnell, J.; Brophy, C.; Ruelle, E.; Shalloo, L.; Lambkin, K.; Hennessy, D. Weather forecasts to enhance an Irish grass growth model. Eur. J. Agron. 2019, 105, 168–175. [CrossRef]
Tamm, T.; Zalite, K.; Voormansik, K.; Talgre, L. Relating Sentinel-1 interferometric coherence to mowing events on grasslands. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 802. [CrossRef]
Stendardi, L.; Karlsen, S.R.; Niedrist, G.; Gerdol, R.; Zebisch, M.; Rossi, M.; Notarnicola, C. Exploiting time series of Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 imagery to detect meadow phenology in mountain regions. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 542. [CrossRef]
Shoko, C.; Mutanga, O.; Dube, T. Determining optimal new generation satellite derived metrics for accurate C3 and C4 grass species aboveground biomass estimation in South Africa. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 564. [CrossRef]
Kumar, L.; Sinha, P.; Taylor, S.; Alqurashi, A.F. Review of the use of remote sensing for biomass estimation to support renewable energy generation. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2015, 9, 097696. [CrossRef]
Punalekar, S.M.; Verhoef, A.; Quaife, T.L.; Humphries, D.; Bermingham, L.; Reynolds, C.K. Application of Sentinel-2A data for pasture biomass monitoring using a physically based radiative transfer model. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 218, 207–220. [CrossRef]
Mutanga, O.; Shoko, C. Monitoring the spatio-temporal variations of C3/C4 grass species using multispectral satellite data. IGARSS 2018, 2018, 8988–8991. [CrossRef]
Darvishzadeh, R.; Wang, T.; Skidmore, A.; Vrieling, A.; O’Connor, B.; Gara, T.W.; Ens, B.J.; Paganini, M. Analysis of Sentinel-2 and rapidEye for retrieval of leaf area index in a saltmarsh using a radiative transfer model. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 671. [CrossRef]
Garioud, A.; Giordano, S.; Valero, S.; Mallet, C. Challenges in Grassland Mowing Event Detection with Multimodal Sentinel Images. MultiTemp 2019, 1–4. [CrossRef]
Alves, R.; Näsi, R.; Niemeläinen, O.; Nyholm, L.; Alhonoja, K.; Kaivosoja, J.; Jauhiainen, L.; Viljanen, N.; Nezami, S.; Markelin, L. Remote Sensing of Environment Machine learning estimators for the quantity and quality of grass swards used for silage production using drone-based imaging spectrometry and photogrammetry. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 246, 111830. [CrossRef]
Fernández-Delgado, M.; Sirsat, M.S.; Cernadas, E.; Alawadi, S.; Barro, S.; Febrero-Bande, M. An extensive experimental survey of regression methods. Neural Netw. 2019, 111, 11–34. [CrossRef]
García, R.; Aguilar, J.; Toro, M.; Pinto, A.; Rodríguez, P. A systematic literature review on the use of machine learning in precision livestock farming. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 179, 105826. [CrossRef]
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019.
RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R; RStudio, Inc.: Boston, MA, USA, 2019.
Moot, D.J.; Scott, W.R.; Roy, A.M.; Nicholls, A.C.; Scott, W.R.; Roy, A.M.; Base, A.C.N. Base temperature and thermal time requirements for germination and emergence of temperate pasture species. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 8233, 15–25. [CrossRef]
Balocchi, O.; Alonso, M.; Keim, J.P. Water-Soluble Carbohydrate Recovery in Pastures of Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and Pasture Brome (Bromus valdivianus Phil.) Under Two Defoliation Frequencies Determined by Thermal Time. Agriculture 2020, 10, 563. [CrossRef]
Anandhi, A. Growing Degree Days—Ecosystem Indicator for changing diurnal temperatures and their impact on corn growth stages in Kansas. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 61, 149–158. [CrossRef]
Salvucci, M.E.; Osteryoung, K.W.; Crafts-brandner, S.J.; Vierling, E. Exceptional Sensitivity of Rubisco Activase to Thermal Denaturation in Vitro and in Vivo 1. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 1053–1064. [CrossRef]
Greco, M.; Parry, A.J.; Andralojc, J.; Carmo-silva, A.E.; Alonso, H. Rubisco activity and regulation targets for crop in DNA In Posidonia oceanica cadmium as induces changes improvement methylation and chromatin patterning. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 717–730. [CrossRef]
Copernicus. Open Access Hub, 2018. Available online: https://scihub.copernicus.eu/(accessed on 7 December 2020).
European Space Agency. Sen2Cor | STEP; European Space Agency: Paris, France, 2018.
Schwalb-Willmann, J. getSpatialData: Get Different Kinds of Freely Available Spatial Datasets. R Package Version 0.0.4. 2018. Available online: https://rdrr.io/github/16EAGLE/getSpatialData/f/NEWS.md (accessed on 7 December 2020).
Filipponi, F. Sentinel-1_GRD_Preprocessing_ Standard Workflow for the Preprocessing of Sentinel-1 GRD Satellite Data; MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, 2020.
ESA. SNAP—ESA Sentinel Application Platform v7.0.0; ESA: Paris, France, 2020.
Rudant, J.P.; Frison, P.L. Télédéction radar: de l’image d’intensité initiale au choix du mode de calibation des coefficients de diffusion beta nought, sigma nought et gamma nought. Revue Française de Photogrammétrie et Télédétection 2019, 219–220, 19–28.
Ranghetti, L.; Busetto, L. Sen2r: Find, Download and Process Sentinel-2 Data. R Package Version 1.2.1. 2019. Available online: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1240384 (accessed on 7 December 2020).
Mueller-Wilm, U. Sen2Cor Configuration and User Manual; ESA: Paris, France, 2016.
GDAL/OGR contributors. GDAL/OGR Geospatial Data Abstraction software Library. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. 2020. Available online: https://gdal.org/(accessed on 7 December 2020).
Higgins, S.; Schellberg, J.; Bailey, J.S. Improving productivity and increasing the efficiency of soil nutrient management on grassland farms in the UK and Ireland using precision agriculture technology. Eur. J. Agron. 2019, 106, 67–74. [CrossRef]
Lugassi, R.; Zaady, E.; Goldshleger, N.; Shoshany, M.; Chudnovsky, A. Spatial and temporal monitoring of pasture ecological quality: Sentinel-2-based estimation of crude protein and neutral detergent fiber contents. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 799. [CrossRef]
Ruelle, E.; Delaby, L. Pertinence du modèle Moorepark-St Gilles Grass Growth dans les conditions climatiques de l Ouest de la France; Description du modèle Moorepark-St Gilles Grass Growth a) b). 2017; pp. 158–159. Available online: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01595315/(accessed on 7 December 2020).
Dowle, M.; Srinivasan, A. data.table: Extension of ‘data.frame’. R Package Version 1.12.8. 2019. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/data.table/index.html (accessed on 7 December 2020).
Wickham, H.; François, R.; Henry, L.; Müller, K. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation; R Package Version 0.8.3; 2019. Available online: https://dplyr.tidyverse.org/(accessed on 7 December 2020).
Pebesma, E. Simple Features for R: Standardized Support for Spatial Vector Data. R J. 2018, 10, 439–446. [CrossRef]
Pebesma, E.J.; Bivand, R.S. Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 2005, 5, 9–13.
Bivand, R.S.; Pebesma, E.; Gomez-Rubio, V. Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013.
Hijmans, R.J. Raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R Package Version 3.0-7. 2019. Available online: https://rdrr.io/cran/raster/(accessed on 7 December 2020).
Bengtsson, H. Future: Unified Parallel and Distributed Processing in R for Everyone. R Package Version 1.16.0. 2020. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/future/index.html (accessed on 7 December 2020).
Bengtsson, H. Future.Apply: Apply Function to Elements in Parallel using Futures; R Package Version 1.4.0; 2020. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/future.apply/index.html (accessed on 7 December 2020).
Ali, I.; Cawkwell, F.; Dwyer, E.; Barrett, B.; Green, S. Satellite remote sensing of grasslands: From observation to management. J. Plant Ecol. 2016, 9, 649–671. [CrossRef]
Henrich, V.; Götze, C.; Jung, A.; Sandow, C.; Thürkow, D.; Cornelia, G. Development of an online indices database: Motivation, concept and implementation. In Proceedings of the 6th EARSeL Imaging Spectroscopy SIG Workshop Innovative Tool for Scientific and Commercial Environment Applications, Tel Aviv, Israel, 16–18 March 2009.
IDB—Sensor_ Sentinel-2A. Available online: https://www.indexdatabase.de/db/s-single.php?id=96 (accessed on 23 January 2021).
Lê, S.; Josse, J.; Husson, F. FactoMineR: A Package for Multivariate Analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 2008, 25, 1–18. [CrossRef]
Kuhn, M. Caret: Classification and Regression Training. R Package Version 6.0-85. 2020. Available online: http://topepo.github. io/caret/index.html (accessed on 23 January 2021).
Ali, I.; Greifeneder, F.; Stamenkovic, J.; Neumann, M.; Notarnicola, C. Review of machine learning approaches for biomass and soil moisture retrievals from remote sensing data. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 16398–16421. [CrossRef]
Houborg, R.; McCabe, M.F. A hybrid training approach for leaf area index estimation via Cubist and random forests machine-learning. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2018, 135, 173–188. [CrossRef]
Houborg, R.; McCabe, M.F. High-Resolution NDVI from planet’s constellation of earth observing nano-satellites: A new data source for precision agriculture. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 768. [CrossRef]
Houborg, R.; McCabe, M.F. A Cubesat enabled Spatio-Temporal Enhancement Method (CESTEM) utilizing Planet, Landsat and MODIS data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 209, 211–226. [CrossRef]
Ali, I.; Cawkwell, F.; Green, S.; Dwyer, N. Application of statistical and machine learning models for grassland yield estimation based on a hypertemporal satellite remote sensing time series. In Proceedings of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 13–18 July 2014; pp. 5060–5063. [CrossRef]
Ali, I.; Cawkwell, F.; Dwyer, E.; Green, S. Modeling Managed Grassland Biomass Estimation by Using Multitemporal Remote Sensing Data-A Machine Learning Approach. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2017, 10, 3254–3264. [CrossRef]
Taravat, A.; Wagner, M.; Oppelt, N. Automatic Grassland Cutting Status Detection in the Context of Spatiotemporal Sentinel-1 Imagery Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 711. [CrossRef]
Shi, Y.; Xiong, F.; Xiu, R.; Liu, Y. A comparative study of relevant vector machine and support vector machine in uncertainty analysis. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering (QR2MSE), Chengdu, China, 15–18 July 2013; pp. 469–472. [CrossRef]
Hanrahan, L.; Geoghegan, A.; O’Donovan, M.; Griffith, V.; Ruelle, E.; Wallace, M.; Shalloo, L. PastureBase Ireland: A grassland decision support system and national database. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2017, 136, 193–201. [CrossRef]
Murphy, D.J.; O’ Brien, B.; Askari, M.S.; McCarthy, T.; Magee, A.; Burke, R.; Murphy, M.D. GrassQ—A holistic precision grass measurement and analysis system to optimize pasture based livestock production. In Proceedings of the 2019 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, 7–10 July 2019. [CrossRef]
Ferraro, F.P.; Nave, R.L.; Sulc, R.M.; Barker, D.J. Seasonal variation in the rising plate meter calibration for forage mass. Agron. J. 2012, 104, 1–6. [CrossRef]
Houborg, R.; McCabe, M.F. Daily retrieval of NDVI and LAI at 3 m resolution via the fusion of CubeSat, Landsat, and MODIS data. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 890. [CrossRef]
