Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation conditions for improved bioethanol production from potato peel residues

Ben Taher, I.; Fickers, Patrick; Chniti, S.; Hassouna, M.

doi:10.1002/btpr.2427

Article (Scientific journals)

Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation conditions for improved bioethanol production from potato peel residues

Ben Taher, I.; Fickers, Patrick; Chniti, S. et al.

2017 • In Biotechnology Progress, 33 (2), p. 397-406

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/257045

DOI
10.1002/btpr.2427

PubMed
27997079

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Biotechnology_Progress_2017.pdf

Publisher postprint (461.92 kB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Aspergillus; Bioethanol; Enzymes; Ethanol; Fermentation; Hydrolysis; Sugars; Surface properties; Yeast; Bio-ethanol production; Fermentation conditions; Hydrothermal pretreatment; Optimized conditions; Potato peels; Pre-Treatment; Response surface methodology; Second generation bioethanol; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Aspergillus niger; Trichoderma; Biodegradation, Environmental; Coculture Techniques; Industrial Waste; Plant Extracts; Refuse Disposal; Solanum tuberosum

Abstract :

[en] The aim of this work was the optimization of the enzyme hydrolysis of potato peel residues (PPR) for bioethanol production. The process included a pretreatment step followed by an enzyme hydrolysis using crude enzyme system composed of cellulase, amylase and hemicellulase, produced by a mixed culture of Aspergillus niger and Trichoderma reesei. Hydrothermal, alkali and acid pretreatments were considered with regards to the enhancement of enzyme hydrolysis of potato peel residues. The obtained results showed that hydrothermal pretreatment lead to a higher enzyme hydrolysis yield compared to both acid and alkali pretreatments. Enzyme hydrolysis was also optimized for parameters such as temperature, pH, substrate loading and surfactant loading using a response surface methodology. Under optimized conditions, 77 g L−1 of reducing sugars were obtained. Yeast fermentation of the released reducing sugars led to an ethanol titer of 30 g L−1 after supplementation of the culture medium with ammonium sulfate. Moreover, a comparative study between acid and enzyme hydrolysis of potato peel residues was investigated. Results showed that enzyme hydrolysis offers higher yield of bioethanol production than acid hydrolysis. These results highlight the potential of second generation bioethanol production from potato peel residues treated with onsite produced hydrolytic enzymes. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 33:397–406, 2017. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers

Disciplines :

Biotechnology

Author, co-author :

Ben Taher, I.; Unité de recherche Sciences des Aliments, Ecole Supérieure des Industries Alimentaires de Tunis, Av Alain Savary, 58, Tunis, Tunisia, Laboratoire de génies biologique et agroalimentaire, Université Libre de Tunis, Av Kheireddine Pacha, 30, Tunis, Tunisia

Fickers, Patrick ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Agronomie, Bio-ingénierie et Chimie (AgroBioChem) > Microbial, food and biobased technologies

Chniti, S.; Université de Rennes 1, ENSCR, CNRS, UMR 6226, avenue du Général Leclerc, CS 50837, Rennes Cedex 7, France

Hassouna, M.; Unité de recherche Sciences des Aliments, Ecole Supérieure des Industries Alimentaires de Tunis, Av Alain Savary, 58, Tunis, Tunisia

Language :

English

Title :

Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation conditions for improved bioethanol production from potato peel residues

Publication date :

2017

Journal title :

Biotechnology Progress

ISSN :

8756-7938

eISSN :

1520-6033

Publisher :

John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

397-406

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 18 February 2021

Statistics

Number of views

75 (5 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

3 (3 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Tian Xf, Fang Z, Guo F. Impact and prospective of fungal pre-treatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enzymatic hydrolysis. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining. 2012;6:335–350.
Pensupa N, Jin M, Kokolski M, Archer DB, Du C. A solid state fungal fermentation-based strategy for the hydrolysis of wheat straw. Bioresour Technol. 2013;149:261–267.
Akpan UG, Kovo AS, Abdullahi M, Ijah J. The production of ethanol from maize cobs and groundnut shells. AU J Technol. 2005;9:106–110.
Data Source: F.O. Licht, c. i. R. F. A., Ethanol Industry Outlook 2008-2014 reports. Available at: www.ethanolrfa.org/pages/annual-industry-outlook, Ethanol Industry Outlook 2008-2014 reports. In Renewable fuels association.
Lin Y, Tanaka S. Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;69:627–642.
del Campo I, Alegría I, Zazpe M, Echeverría M, Echeverría I. Diluted acid hydrolysis pretreatment of agri-food wastes for bioethanol production. Indus Crops Prod. 2006;24:214–221.
Arapoglou D, Varzakas T, Vlyssides A, Israilides C. Ethanol production from potato peel waste (PPW). Waste Manage. 2010;30:1898–1902.
dos Santos TC, Gomes DPP, Bonomo RCF, Franco M. Optimisation of solid state fermentation of potato peel for the production of cellulolytic enzymes. Food Chem. 2012;133:1299–1304.
Kosseva MR. Chapter 3—sources, characterization, and composition of food industry wastes. In: Webb MRK, editor. Food Industry Wastes. San Diego: Academic Press; 2013: 37–60.
Nelson ML. Utilization and application of wet potato processing coproducts for finishing cattle. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:E133–E142.
Wu D. Recycle technology for potato peel waste processing: a review. Proc Environ Sci. 2016;31:103–107.
Niphadkar SS, Rathod VK. Ultrasound-assisted three-phase partitioning of polyphenol oxidase from potato peel (Solanum tuberosum). Biotechnol Prog. 2015;31:1340–1347.
Mohdaly AA, Sarhan MA, Smetanska I, Mahmoud A. Antioxidant properties of various solvent extracts of potato peel, sugar beet pulp and sesame cake. J Sci Food Agric. 2010;90:218–226.
Wishley A, Rao VA. Potato peel as a source of important phytochemical antioxidant nutraceuticals and their role in human health—a review. In Phytochemicals as Nutraceuticals—Global Approaches to Their Role in Nutrition and Health, 2012.
Sonderegger M, Jeppsson M, Larsson C, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Boles E, Olsson L, Spencer-Martins I, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Sauer U. Fermentation performance of engineered and evolved xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004;87:90–98.
Bansal N, Tewari R, Soni R, Soni SK. Production of cellulases from Aspergillus niger NS-2 in solid state fermentation on agricultural and kitchen waste residues. Waste Manage (New York, N.Y.). 2012;32:1341–1346.
Ibbett R, Gaddipati S, Davies S, Hill S, Tucker G. The mechanisms of hydrothermal deconstruction of lignocellulose: new insights from thermal–analytical and complementary studies. Bioresource Technol. 2011;102:9272–9278.
Khushal B, Praveen VV. Cellulolytic enzymes production via solid-state fermentation: effect of pretreatment methods on physicochemical characteristics of substrate. Enzyme Res. 2011;2011:1–11.
Didderen I, Destain J, Thonart P. Le bioéthanol de seconde génération: la production d'éthanol à partir de biomasse lignocellulosique. Presses agronomiques de Gembloux: 2008.
Qi B, Chen X, Shen F, Su Y, Wan Y. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw pretreated by alkaline peroxide using response surface methodology. Indus Eng Chem Res. 2009;48:7346–7353.
Hahn-Hagerdal B, Galbe M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Liden G, Zacchi G. Bio-ethanol—the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol. 2006;24:549–556.
John RP, Nampoothiri KM, Pandey A. Fermentative production of lactic acid from biomass: an overview on process developments and future perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74:524–534.
Singh A, Tuteja S, Singh N, Bishnoi NR. Enhanced saccharification of rice straw and hull by microwave–alkali pretreatment and lignocellulolytic enzyme production. Bioresource Technol. 2011;102:1773–1782.
Dien BS, Li XL, Iten LB, Jordan DB, Nichols NN, O'Bryan PJ, Cotta MA. Enzymatic saccharification of hot-water pretreated corn fiber for production of monosaccharides. Enzyme Microbial Technol. 2006;39:1137–1144.
Jaini F, Dwi S, Mulyorini M. Bioethanol production from seaweed euchema cottoni by neutralization and detoxification of acidic catalyzed hydrolyzate. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2014;5:455.
Khawla BJ, Sameh M, Imen G, Donyes F, Dhouha G, Raoudha EG, Oumèma NE. Potato peel as feedstock for bioethanol production: a comparison of acidic and enzymatic hydrolysis. Indus Crops Prod. 2014;52:144–149.
Richelle A, Ben Tahar I, Hassouna M, Bogaerts P. Macroscopic modelling of bioethanol production from potato peel wastes in batch cultures supplemented with inorganic nitrogen. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2015;38:1819–1833.
Fundora N, Vldes I, Garcia R, Hernandez LM, Porto O, Gonzalez MD. Influence of nitrogen salts on alcohol production. Revista ICIDCA Sobre Los Derivados De La. Cana. Dec Azucar. 2000;34:1–3.
Ververis C, Georghiou K, Danielidis D, Hatzinikolaou DG, Santas P, Santas R, Corleti V. Cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin and ash content of some organic materials and their suitability for use as paper pulp supplements. Bioresource Technol. 2007;8:296–301.
Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars. Anal Chem. 1959;31:428.
Chinoy JJ. A new iodine method for the determination of starch. Part V. Starch in leaf material. Analyst. 1938;63:876–883.
Uma C, Muthulakshmi C, Gomathi D, Gopalakrishnan VK. Fungal invertase as aid for production of ethanol from sugarcane bagasse. Res J Microbiol. 2010;5:980.
Makawi SZA, Taha MI, Zakaria BA, Siddig B, Mahmod H, Elhussein ARM, Kariem EAG. Identification and quantification of 5-hydroxymethyl furfural HMF in some sugar-containing food products by HPLC. Pakistan J Nutr. 2009;8:1391–1396.
Zeng M, Mosier NS, Huang CP, Sherman DM, Ladisch MR. Microscopic examination of changes of plant cell structure in corn stover due to hot water pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;97:265–278.
Wajira S, RatnayakE G, Chika Otani DS. Jackson DSC enthalpic transitions during starch gelatinization in excess water, dilute sodium chloride and succrose solutions. Faculty Publ Food Sci Technol. 2012;5.
Chaturvedi V, Verma P. An overview of key pretreatment processes employed for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels and value added products. 3 Biotech 2013;3:415–431.
Stevulova N, Cigasova J, Estokova A, Terpakova E, Geffert A, Kacik F, Singovszka E, Holub M. Properties characterization of chemically modified hemp hurds. Materials 2014;7:8131.
Aiello C, Ferrer A, Ledesma A. Effect of alkaline treatments at various temperatures on cellulase and biomass production using submerged sugarcane bagasse fermentation with Trichoderma reesei QM 9414. Bioresource Technol. 1996;57:13–18.
Jabasingh A. Response surface methodology for the evaluation and comparison of cellulase production by Aspergillus nidulans SU04 and Aspergillus nidulans MTCC344 cultivated on pretreated sugarcane bagasse. Chem Biochem Eng. 2011;25:501.
Oh SY, Yoo DI, Shin Y, Seo G. FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide. Carbohydr Res. 2005;340:417–428.
Rashid I, Omari MHA, Leharne SA, Chowdhry BZ, Badwan A. Starch gelatinization using sodium silicate: FTIR, DSC, XRPD, and NMR studies. Starch Stärke 2012;64:713–728.
Wang Z, Keshwani D, Redding A, Cheng J. Alkaline pretreatment of coastal bermudagrass for bioethanol production. ASABE Annu Int Meet Rhode Island Convention Center Providence Rhode Island 2008:1–11.
Sukumaran RK, Singhania RR, Mathew GM, Pandey A. Cellulase production using biomass feed stock and its application in lignocellulose saccharification for bio-ethanol production. Renewable Energy 2009;34:421–424.
Sindhu R, Kuttiraja M, Binod P, Janu KU, Sukumaran RK, Pandey A. Dilute acid pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of sugarcane tops for bioethanol production. Bioresource Technol. 2011;102:10915–10921.
Kim H, Kim S, Kim C. The effects of nonionic surfactants on the pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of recycled newspaper. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2007;12:147–151.
Peterson, Michelle E, Daniel, Roy M, Danson, Michael J, Eisenthal R. The dependence of enzyme activity on temperature: determination and validation of parameters. Biochem J. 2007;402:331, 337.
Soccol CR, Vandenberghe LPDS, Medeiros ABP, Karp SG, Buckeridge M, Ramos LP, Pitarelo AP, Ferreira-Leitão V, Gottschalk LMF, Ferrara MA, Silva Bon EPD, Moraes LMPD, Araújo JDA, Torres FAG. Bioethanol from lignocelluloses: status and perspectives in Brazil. Bioresource Technol. 2010;101:4820–4825.
Sarkar N, Ghosh SK, Bannerjee S, Aikat K. Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: an overview. Renewable Energy. 2012;37:19–27.
Modig T, Lidén G, Taherzadeh MJ. Inhibition effects of furfural on alcohol dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase and pyruvate dehydrogenase. Biochem J. 2002;363:769–776.
Rachma Wikandari RM, Siti Syamsiyah RM, Yuliana A. Effect of furfural, hydroxymethylfurfural and acetic acid on indigeneous microbial isolate for bioethanol production. Agric J. 2010;5:105–109.
Bell SJ, Henschke PA. Implications of nitrogen nutrition for grapes, fermentation and wine. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 2005;11:242–295.
Kim TH, Taylor F, Hicks KB. Bioethanol production from barley hull using SAA (soaking in aqueous ammonia) pretreatment. Bioresource Technol. 2008;99:5694–5702.
Gouvea BM, Torres C, Franca AS, Oliveira LS, Oliveira ES. Feasibility of ethanol production from coffee husks. Biotechnol Lett. 2009;31:1315–1319.