Request a copy

Full Text

See more details

X (2)

Patents (1)

Mendeley (154)

74

CITATIONS

74 Total citations

50 Recent citations

28 Field Citation Ratio

n/a Relative Citation Ratio

publications

0

supporting

0

mentioning

0

contrasting

0

Smart Citations

0

0

0

0

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

• Schwartzman, H., Meeting, The, Gatherings in Organizations and Communities. 1989, Springer.
• Rogelberg, S.G., Why your meetings stink - and what to do about it. Harv. Bus. Rev., 2019, 140–143.
• Keating, E., Jarvenpaa, S.L., Matter, Words, Communicating Effectively in the New Global Office. 2016, University of California Press, Oakland, California.
• Richter, A., Locked-down digital work. Int. J. Inf. Manage., 55, 2020, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102157.
• Marks, P., Virtual collaboration in the age of the coronavirus. Commun. ACM 63 (2020), 21–23, 10.1145/3409803.
• Denstadli, J.M., Julsrud, T.E., Hjorthol, R.J., Videoconferencing as a mode of communication: a comparative study of the use of videoconferencing and face-to-Face meetings. J. Bus. Tech. Commun. 26 (2011), 65–91.
• Fjermestad, J., An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research. Decis. Support Syst. 37 (2004), 239–263.
• Zack, M.H., Interactivity and communication mode choice in ongoing management groups. Inf. Syst. Res. 4 (1993), 207–239.
• Pye, R., Williams, E., Teleconferencing: is video valuable or is audio adequate?. Telecomm. Policy, 1977, 230–241.
• Radford, G., Morganstern, B., The impact of four conferencing formats on the efficiency and quality of small group decision making in a laboratory experiment setting. Telemat. Informatics. 11 (1994), 97–109.
• Kydd, C., Ferry, D., Managerial use of video conferencing. Inf. Manag. 27 (1994), 369–375.
• Bartlett, J., Telepresence: beautiful and expensive. Bus. Commun. Rev. 37 (2007), 20–25.
• Conti, J., Technology telepresence: i see live people. Eng. Manag. J. 17 (2007), 12–16.
• Allen, J., Beck, T., Scott, C.W., Rogelberg, S.G., Understanding workplace meetings. Manag. Res. Rev. 37 (2014), 791–814.
• Standaert, W., Muylle, S., Basu, A., An empirical study of the effectiveness of telepresence as a business meeting mode. Inf. Technol. Manag. 17 (2016), 323–339.
• Hoegl, M., Gemuenden, H.G., Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ. Sci. 12 (2001), 435–449.
• Westmyer, S.A., DiCioccio, R.L., Rubin, R.B., Appropriateness and effectiveness of communication channels in competent interpersonal communication. J. Commun. 48 (1998), 27–48.
• Curtis, A.M., Dennis, A.R., McNamara, K.O., From monologue to dialogue: performative objects to promote collective mindfulness in computer-mediated team discussions. MIS Q. 41 (2017), 559–581.
• O'Leary, M.B., Wilson, J.M., Metiu, A., Beyond being there: the symbolic role of communication and identification of perceptions of proximity to geograpichally dispersed colleagues. MIS Q. 38 (2014), 1219–1243.
• King, R., Xia, W., Appropriateness, Media, Effects of experience on communication media choice. Decis. Sci. 28 (1997), 877–910.
• Te'eni, D., Review: a cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. MIS Q. 25 (2001), 251–312.
• Dennis, A., Fuller, R., Valacich, J., Media, tasks, and communication processes: a theory of media synchronicity. MIS Q. 32 (2008), 575–600.
• Maruping, L.M., Agarwal, R., Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. J. Appl. Psychol. 89 (2004), 975–990, 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.975.
• Mennecke, B., Valacich, J., Wheeler, B., The effects of media and task on user performance: a test of the task-media fit hypothesis. Gr. Decis. Negot. 9 (2000), 507–529.
• George, J.F., Carlson, J.R., Valacich, J.S., Media selection as a strategic component of communication. MIS Q. 37 (2013), 1233–1251.
• Zigurs, I., Khazanchi, D., From profiles to patterns: a new view of task-technology fit. Inf. Syst. Manag. 25 (2008), 8–13.
• Goodhue, D., Thompson, R., Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 19 (1995), 213–236.
• Fuller, R.M., Dennis, A.R., Does fit matter? The impact of task-technology fit and appropriation on team performance in repeated tasks. Inf. Syst. Res. 20 (2009), 2–17, 10.1287/isre.1070.0167.
• Serrano, C., Karahanna, E., The compensatory interaction between user capabilities and technology capabilities in influencing tesk performance: an emperical assessment in telemedicine consultations. MIS Q., 40, 2016.
• Short, J., Williams, E., Christie, B., The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. 1976, John Wiley & Sons, London.
• Chidambaram, L., Jones, B., Impact of communication medium and computer support on group perceptions and performance: a comparison of face-to-face and dispersed meetings. MIS Q. 17 (1993), 465–491.
• Daft, R., Lengel, R., Trevino, L.K., Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: implications for information systems. MIS Q. 11 (1987), 355–366.
• Markus, M.L., Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organ. Sci. 5 (1994), 502–527.
• Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Speier, C., Morris, M.G., Beyond media richness: an empirical test of media synchronicity theory. 31st Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., 1998, 48–57.
• Rice, R.E., Appropriateness, Media, Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Hum. Commun. Res. 19 (1993), 451–484.
• Watson-Manheim, M.-B., Bélanger, F., Communication media repertoires: dealing with the multiplicity of media choices. MIS Q. 31 (2007), 267–293.
• Kock, N., The psychobiological model: towards a new theory of computer-mediated communication based on Darwinian evolution. Organ. Sci. 15 (2004), 327–348.
• Trevino, L.K., Lengel, R.H., Daft, R.L., Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations: a symbolic interactionist perspective. Communic. Res. 14 (1987), 553–574, 10.1177/009365087014005006.
• Kock, N., Compensatory adaptation to a lean medium: an action research investigation of electronic communication in process improvement groups. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 44 (2001), 267–285, 10.1109/47.968108.
• Walther, J.B., Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a relational perspective. Communic. Res. 19 (1992), 52–90, 10.1177/009365092019001003.
• Dennis, A.R., Garfield, M.J., The adoption and use of GSS in project teams: toward more participative processes and outcomes. MIS Q. 27 (2003), 289–323.
• Nunamaker, J.F., Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Vogel, D.R., Information technology for negotiating groups: generating options for mutual gain. Manage. Sci. 37 (1991), 1325–1346.
• Dennis, A., George, J., Jessup, L., Nunamaker, J.F., Vogel, D.R., Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Q. 12 (1988), 591–624.
• Zigurs, I., Buckland, B., A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Q. 22 (1998), 313–334.
• Fish, R., Kraut, R., Root, R., Rice, R., Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication. Proc. SIGCHI Conf., 1992, 37–48.
• Van De Ven, A.H., Delbecq, A.L., Koenig, R. Jr., Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 41 (1976), 322–338 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2094477.
• Fish, R., Kraut, R., Chalfonte, B., The VideoWindow system in informal communication. Proc. 1990 ACM Conf. CSCW, 1990.
• Habermas, J., The Theory of Communicative Action. 1987, Heinemann Education, London.
• McGrath, J., Groups: Interaction and Performance. 1984, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
• Campbell, D.J., Task complexity: a review and analysis. Acad. Manage. Rev. 13 (1988), 40–52.
• Watson-Manheim, M.-B., Bélanger, F., Support for communication-based work processes in virtual work. E-Service J. 1 (2002), 61–82, 10.1353/esj.2002.0014.
• Leach, D.J., Rogelberg, S.G., Warr, P.B., Burnfield, J.L., Perceived meeting effectiveness: the role of design characteristics. J. Bus. Psychol. 24 (2009), 65–76, 10.1007/s10869-009-9092-6.
• Tracy, K., Dimock, A., Meetings: discursive sites for building and fragmenting community. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 28 (2004), 127–165, 10.1080/23808985.2004.11679034.
• McComas, K.A., Citizen satisfaction with public meetings used for risk communication. J. Appl. Commun. Res. 31 (2003), 164–184, 10.1080/0090988032000064605.
• Jay, A., How to run a meeting. Harv. Bus. Rev., 1976, 43–57.
• Mankins, M., Brahm, C., Caimi, G., Your scarcest resource. Harv. Bus. Rev. 92 (2014), 74–80.
• McComas, K.A., Theory and practice of public meetings. Commun. Theory, 2001, 36–55, 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00232.x.
• Romano, N.C., Nunamaker, J.F., Meeting analysis: findings from research and practice. 34th Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., 2001, 1–13.
• Kettinger, W.J., Grover, V., The use of computer-mediated communication in an interorganizational context. Decis. Sci. 28 (1997), 513–555, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01321.x.
• Bartelt, V.L., Dennis, A.R., Nature and nurture: the impact of automaticity and the structuration of communication on virtual team behavior and performance. MIS Q. 38 (2014), 521–538.
• Lengel, R.H., Daft, R.L., The selection of communication media as an executive skill. Acad. Manag. Exec. 2 (1989), 225–232.
• Vertegaal, R., The GAZE groupware system: mediating joint attention in multiparty communication and collaboration. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst., 1999.
• Olson, G.M., Olson, J.S., Distance matters. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 15 (2000), 139–178.
• Buxton, W.A.S., Telepresence: integrating shared task and person spaces. Proc. Groupw., 1991, 27–36.
• Reinsch, N.L., Turner, J.W., Tinsley, C.H., Multicommunicating: a practice whose time has come?. Acad. Manage. Rev. 33 (2008), 391–403.
• Sellen, A., Conversations, Remote, The effects of mediating talk with technology. Univers. Access Hum. Interact. 2009 (2009) 10 (1995), 401–444.
• Hinds, P., Mortensen, M., Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: the moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16 (2005), 290–307.
• Sillince, J.A.A., A media-attributes and design-choices theory of the information technology -organization relation. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer. 7 (1997), 279–303, 10.1207/s15327744joce0704.
• Rosemann, M., Vessey, I., Toward improving the relevance of information systems research to practice: the role of applicability checks. MIS Q. 32 (2008), 1–22.
• Trevino, L.K., Webster, J., Stein, E.W., Making connections: complementary influences on communication media choices attitudes, and use. Organ. Sci. 11 (2000), 163–182.
• Webster, J., Trevino, L.K., Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: two policy-capturing studies. Acad. Manag. J. 38 (1995), 1544–1572.
• Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., Podsakoff, N.P., Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88 (2003), 879–903.
• Hufnagel, E.M., Conca, C., User response data: the potential for errors and biases. Inf. Syst. Res. 5 (1994), 48–73.
• Krosnick, J.A., Alwin, D.F., An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement. Public Opin. Q. 51 (1987), 201–219.
• Denstadli, J.M., Gripsrud, M., Hjorthol, R., Julsrud, T.E., Videoconferencing and business air travel: do new technologies produce new interaction patterns?. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 29 (2013), 1–13, 10.1016/j.trc.2012.12.009.
• Cho, H., LaRose, R., Privacy issues in internet surveys. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 17 (1999), 421–434, 10.1177/089443939901700402.
• Volkema, R., Niederman, F., Planning and managing organizational meetings: an empirical analysis of written and oral communications. Int. J. Bus. Data Commun. Netw. 33 (1996), 275–296.
• Barnett, J., Sensitive questions and response effects: an evaluation. J. Manag. Psychol. 13 (1998), 63–76, 10.1108/02683949810369138.
• Edwards, Y.D., Allenby, G.M., Multivariate analysis of multiple response data. J. Mark. Res. 40 (2003), 321–334, 10.1509/jmkr.40.3.321.19233.
• a McCarty, J., Shrum, L.J., The measurement of personal values in survey research: a test of alternative rating procedures. Public Opin. Q. 64 (2000), 271–298, 10.1086/317989.
• Neter, J., Kutner, M., Nachtsheim, C., Wasserman, W., Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4th ed., 1996, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.
• Rucker, D.D., McShane, B.B., Preacher, K.J., A researcher's guide to regression, discretization, and median splits of continuous variables. J. Consum. Psychol. 25 (2015), 666–678.
• Donà, G., Berry, J.W., Acculturation attitudes and acculturative stress of central american refugees. Int. J. Psychol. 29 (1994), 57–70, 10.1080/00207599408246532.
• Whittaker, S., Theories and methods in mediated communication. Graesser, A., Gernsbacher, M., Goldman, S., (eds.) Handb. Discourse Process., 2003, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 243–286.
• Bordia, P., Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: a synthesis of the experimental literature. Int. J. Bus. Data Commun. Netw. 34 (1997), 99–120.
• Hollingshead, A.B., Mcgrath, J.E., O'Connor, K.M., Group task performance and communication technology: a longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-Face work groups. Small Gr. Res. 24 (1993), 307–333, 10.1177/1046496493243003.
• Katz, A., Te'eni, D., The contingent impact of contextualization on computer-mediated collaboration. Organ. Sci. 18 (2007), 261–279.
• Tung, L., Turban, E., A proposed research framework for distributed group support systems. Decis. Support Syst. 23 (1998), 175–188, 10.1016/S0167-9236(98)00040-2.
• Wainfan, L., Davis, P.K., Challenges in Virtual Collaboration. 2004.
• Handy, C., Trust and the virtual organization. Harv. Bus. Rev. 73 (1995), 40–50, 10.1016/0024-6301(95)94284-6.
• Carlson, P.J., Davis, G.G.B., An investigation of media selection among directors and managers: from “self” to “other” orientation. MIS Q. 22 (1998), 335–362.
• Yoo, Y., Alavi, M., Media and group cohesion: relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. MIS Q. 25 (2001), 371–390.
• Straub, D., Karahanna, E., Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organ. Sci. 9 (1998), 160–175.
• DeSanctis, G., Poole, M., Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5 (1994), 121–147.
• Fulk, J., Steinfield, C.W., Schmitz, J., Power, J.G., A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communic. Res. 14 (1987), 529–552.
• Walther, J.B., Bazarova, N.N., Validation and application of electronic propinquity theory to computer-mediated communication in groups. Commun. Res. 35 (2008), 622–645.
• Carlson, J.R., Zmud, R., Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad. Manag. J. 42 (1999), 153–170.
• Brown, S.A., Dennis, A.R., Venkatesh, V., Predicting collaboration technology use: integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 27 (2010), 9–54, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222270201.
• Venkatesh, V., Bala, H., Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39 (2008), 273–315.
• Arnold, U., Kärner, H., Schnabel, M., Target-oriented use of strategic sourcing tools: a critical analysis creating process awareness for electronic reverse auctions. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 11 (2005), 116–128.
• Briggs, R.O., de Vreede, G.-J., Reinig, B.A., A theory and measurement of meeting satisfaction. 36th Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., IEEE, 2003.
• Cameron, A.-F., Webster, J., Multicommunicating: Juggling Multiple Conversations in the Workplace. Inf. Syst. Res. 24 (2013), 352–371, 10.1287/isre.1120.0446.
• Lombard, M., Ditton, T., At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J. Comput. Commun., 3, 1997.
• Minsky, M., Telepresence, Omni. 1980, 45–51.
• Steuer, J., Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J. Commun. 42 (1992), 73–93.
• Root, R.W., Design of a multi-media vehicle for social browsing. Proc. 1988 ACM Conf. Comput. Coop. Work, 1988, 25–38, 10.1145/62266.62269.
• Nakanishi, H., Yoshida, C., Nishimura, T., I. T, FreeWalk: a 3D virtual space for casual meetings. MultiMedia 6 (1999), 20–28.