Article (Scientific journals)
Does artificial feeding affect large carnivore behaviours? The case study of brown bears in a hunted and tourist exploited subpopulation
Penteriani, V.; Lamamy, Cindy; Kojola, Ilpo et al.
2021In Biological Conservation, 254, p. 10
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Penteriani V., et al._Does feeding affect large carnivore_Biol. Conserv_PR2020.pdf
Publisher postprint (3.6 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Artificial feeding; Feeding sites; Food subsidies; Food supplementation; Movement patterns; Supplementary feeding; Supplementary food; Ursus arctos
Abstract :
[en] Artificial food supplementation of wildlife is an increasing practice for species conservation, as well as for hunting and viewing tourism. Yet, our understanding of the implications of wildlife supplementary feeding is still very limited. Concerns have been raised over the potential negative impact of artificial feeding, but the effects of this practice on animal movements and rhythms of activity are just beginning to be investigated. Here, with the aim of studying whether the artificial feeding of brown bears may affect their behaviour, we analysed (1) the probability and intensity of feeding site use at different temporal scales, (2) how the use of artificial feeding sites is related to the bear’s age and sex, main periods of the bear’s annual cycle (i.e. mating and hyperphagia) and characteristics of the feeding sites, and (3) how the use of artificial feeding may be affecting bear movement patterns. We analysed the movements of 71 radio-collared brown bears in southern-central Finland and western Russian Karelia. Artificial feeding sites had several effects on brown bears in boreal habitats. The probability of a feeding site being used was positively correlated to the stability of this food resource over time, whereas sexes and bear classes (subadults, adults and females with cubs) did not show significant differences in the use of feeding sites, which were visited predominantly at night and slightly more during hyperphagia. The probability of using an artificial feeding site affected the daily net distance only (bears using feeding sites: 3.5 ± 4.5 km, range: 0–29 km; bears not using feeding sites: 4.4 ± 4.9 km, range: 0–47 km). Those brown bears using artificial feeding more intensively moved shorter distances at a lower speed within smaller home ranges compared to bears that used this food sources less. Highly predictable and continuously available anthropogenic food may therefore have substantial impacts on brown bear movement patterns, ecology and health. The recorded changes in movement patterns support the evidence that artificial feeding may have important implications for bear ecology and conservation.
Disciplines :
Zoology
Agriculture & agronomy
Author, co-author :
Penteriani, V.
Lamamy, Cindy ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Gestion des ressources forestières et des milieux naturels
Kojola, Ilpo
Heikkinen, Samuli
Bombieri, Giulia
del Mar Delgado, Maria
Language :
English
Title :
Does artificial feeding affect large carnivore behaviours? The case study of brown bears in a hunted and tourist exploited subpopulation
Publication date :
2021
Journal title :
Biological Conservation
ISSN :
0006-3207
Publisher :
Elsevier, Netherlands
Volume :
254
Pages :
10
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 11 January 2021

Statistics


Number of views
70 (16 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
164 (7 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
17
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
12
OpenCitations
 
6

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi