Article (Scientific journals)
Brand repulsion: consumers' boundary work with rejected brands
Dessart, Laurence; Cova, Bernard
2021In European Journal of Marketing, 55 (4), p. 1758-7123
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Dessart & Cova EJM -author preprint.pdf
Author preprint (936.67 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
brand repulsion; Apple; boundary work; identity project; attraction; rejection
Abstract :
[en] This paper aims: 1) to conceptualize brand repulsion as a specific nuance of brand rejection; 2) to highlight the boundary work at play in situations of collective brand repulsion; 3) to extract implications for the brands that are at the centre of such situations and to delineate future directions for scholars.Our study of the “I Hate Apple” group on Facebook is grounded in a six-year long naturalistic enquiry designed to capture the boundary work performed by its members. Our sources include netnographic data, online focus groups, observations and personal online correspondence with members and moderators. Our findings reveal that certain brands serve the identity work of consumers by allowing them in erecting boundaries based on three major sources of repulsion: anti-fandom, anti-hegemony and anti-marketing. They show that for each type of boundary work, corporate and product brand repulsion seems prevalent.Our research limits itself to considering the types of boundary work related to brand repulsion as regards a single brand: Apple.
Disciplines :
Marketing
Author, co-author :
Dessart, Laurence  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège : UER > UER Management : Marketing et intelligence stratégique
Cova, Bernard;  KEDGE Business School > Marketing
Language :
English
Title :
Brand repulsion: consumers' boundary work with rejected brands
Publication date :
2021
Journal title :
European Journal of Marketing
ISSN :
0309-0566
eISSN :
1758-7123
Publisher :
Emerald, Bingley, United Kingdom
Volume :
55
Issue :
4
Pages :
1758-7123
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 16 December 2020

Statistics


Number of views
135 (18 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
9 (9 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
20
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
17
OpenCitations
 
4

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi