Bringing symmetry between and within safety and security cultures in high-risk organizations

Glesner, Colin; Fallon, Catherine; Turcanu, Catrinel; Van Oudheusden, Michiel

doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104950

Download

Article (Scientific journals)

Bringing symmetry between and within safety and security cultures in high-risk organizations

Glesner, Colin; Fallon, Catherine; Turcanu, Catrinel et al.

2020 • In Safety Science, 132

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/251110

DOI
10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104950

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

2020 c.glesner et al bringing symmetry between and within safety and security cultures.pdf

Publisher postprint (298.57 kB)

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Safety Culture; Security Culture; ANT; Coproduction; High-risk Organizations

Abstract :

[en] Based on a review of scholarly, regulatory and policy literatures, this article illustrates how‘safety culture’and‘security culture’are conventionally understood within the context of high-risk organizations. It identifies two important recurring gaps in the literature: (1) the subordination of the analysis of security culture to safety culture concepts, and (2) the anthropocentricity inscribed in both notions, which sideline the dynamic interplaybetween social and technical elements in the constitution of‘culture’. To address these gaps, the article in-troduces concepts and heuristics from Science and Technology Studies, specifically co-production and Actor-Network Theory. Using the concrete examples of the labelling of hazardous materials and the“four eyes”principle, it highlights how these heuristics may open onto a more symmetrical analysis of safety and security cultures in high-risk contexts. It thereby seeks to make visible the mutual shaping of safety and security cultures and attend to the roles of non-human actors as active participants in such processes

Research Center/Unit :

SPIRAL

Disciplines :

Sociology & social sciences

Author, co-author :

Glesner, Colin ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de science politique > Gouvernance et société

Fallon, Catherine ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de science politique > Département de science politique

Turcanu, Catrinel

Van Oudheusden, Michiel ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de science politique > Département de science politique

Language :

English

Title :

Bringing symmetry between and within safety and security cultures in high-risk organizations

Publication date :

December 2020

Journal title :

Safety Science

ISSN :

0925-7535

eISSN :

1879-1042

Publisher :

Elsevier, Tokyo, Japan

Volume :

132

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Funders :

SCK CEN - Centre d'Étude de l'Énergie Nucléaire [BE]

Available on ORBi :

since 26 September 2020

Statistics

Number of views

109 (3 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

289 (2 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Aanestad, M., The camera as an actor: design-in-use of telemedicine infrastructure in surgery. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 12 (2003), 1–20.
Akrich, M., Callon, M., Latour, B., & Strum, S. (2013). Sociologie de la traduction. http://books.openedition.org/pressesmines/1181.
Antonsen, S., Safety culture and the issue of power. Saf. Sci. 47 (2009), 183–191.
Argenti, F., Landucci, G., Spadoni, G., Cozzani, V., The assessments of the attractiveness of process facilities to terorrist attacks. Saf. Sci. 77 (2015), 169–181.
Aven, T., A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 92:6 (2007), 745–754, 10.1016/j.ress.2006.03.008.
Aven, T., Ben-Haim, Y., Boje Andersen, H., Cox, T., Lopez Droguett, E., Greenberg, M., Guikema, S., Kroeger, W., Renn, O., Thompson, K. M., & Zio, E. (2015). SRA Glossary. Committee on Foundation of Risk Analysis.
Batra, A., Nelson, P., Safety, safeguards and security in Indian civil nuclear facilities (Scientific Report NSSPI-12-010. 2012, Nuclear Security Science and Policy Institute p. 96.
Bernard, B., Safety culture as a way of responsive regulation: Proposal for a nucelar safety culture oversight model. Int. Nuclear Safety J. 3:2 (2014), 1–11.
Bijker, W.E., Hommels, A., Mesman, J., Vulnerability in Technological Cultures. 2014, New Directions in Research and Governance. The MIT Press.
Bloch, M., How We Think They Think. 1998, Westview Press.
Bodenschatz, A., Irlenbusch, B., Do two bribe less than one? – An experimental study on the four-eyes-principle. Appl. Economics Lett. 26:3 (2019), 191–195.
Burgess, P.J., Reniers, G.L.L., Ponnet, K., Wim, H., Wim, S., Socially repsonsible innovation in security. 2018, Critical reflections, Routledge New Security Studies.
Callon, M. (1985). Eléments pour une sociologie de la traduction. La domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques et des marins pêcheurs dans la baie de Saint-Brieuc. L'Année sociologique, 40.
Choudhry, R.M., Fang, D., Mohamed, S., The nature of safety culture: a survey of the state-of-the-art. Saf. Sci. 45 (2007), 993–1012.
Cooper, M.D., Towards a model of safety culture. Saf. Sci. 36 (2000), 111–136.
Cooper, M. D. (2016). Navigating the safety culture construct: A review of the evidence. International Conference on Safety Culture, 36.
Cox, S., Cox, T., The structure of employee attitudes to safety: An European example. Work and Stress 5:2 (1991), 93–106.
Cox, S., Flin, R., Safety culture: Philosopher's stone or man of straw?. Work Stress 12:3 (1998), 189–201, 10.1080/02678379808256861.
Dekker, S. (2011). Drift into failure. From hunting broken components to understanding complex systems. Ashgate Publishing.
Dupont, I., Reniers, G.L.L., Vergelijkende studie tussen veiligheid en beveiliging: Toepassen van proactieve beschermingsprogramma's bij kritieke infrastructuren. Econ. Management, 2010, 1–29.
Edwards, J.R.D., Davey, J., Armstrong, K., Returning to the roots of culture: A review and re-conceptualisation of safety culture. Saf. Sci. 55 (2013), 70–80.
Directive 2012/18/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directive 96/82/EC, Pub. L. No. L 197/1, Official Journal of the European Union 1 (2012).
Flory, D. (2013). Strengthening nuclear safety and security globally a continued international challenge. 1–8.
Fucks, I. (2004). La culture de sûreté selon une démarche compréhensive. Une contribution à la gouvernance des risques dans des systèmes complexes. [Doctoral Thesis]. Centre d'Etude de l'Energie Nucléaire.
Furnham, A., Gunter, B., Corporate Assessment. 2015, Routledge.
Gandhi, S., Kang, J., Nuclear safety and nuclear security synergy. Ann. Nucl. Energy 60 (2013), 357–361.
Geertz, C., The interpretation of cultures. 1993, Basic Books.
Gilbert, C., Journé, B., Laroche, H., & Bieder, C. (Eds.). (2018). Safety cultures, Safety models. Taking stock and moving forward. Springer Publishing.
Glendon, A.I., Stanton, N.A., Perspectives on safety culture. Saf. Sci. 34 (2000), 193–214.
Graff Lambsdorff, J. (2015). Preventing corruption by promoting trust: Insights from behavioral science (p. 18) [Passauer Diskussionspapiere - Volkswirtschaftliche Reihe]. Universität Passau, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
Grote, G., Künzler, C., Diagnosis of safety culture in safety management audits. Saf. Sci. 34 (2000), 131–150.
Guldenmund, F.W., The use of questionnaires in safety culture research – an evaluation. Saf. Sci. 45 (2007), 723–742.
Guldenmund, F.W., Understanding safety culture through models and metaphors. Safety cultures, Safety models: Taking stock and moving forward, 2018, Springer Publishing, 21–34.
Guldenmund, Frank. W. (2000). The nature of safety culture: A review of theory and research. Safety Science, 34, 215–257.
Haavik, T.K., On Components and Relations in Sociotechnical Systems. J. Contingencies Crisis Management 19:2 (2011), 99–109.
Hahn, C., Intersection between nuclear safety and nuclear security. 2011, Our nuclear future, Seoul South Korea, Asan Plenum.
Harsh, S., Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Res. J. 11:2 (2011), 63–75.
Harvey, J., Erdos, G., Bolam, H., Cox, M.A.A., Kennedy, J.N.P., Gregory, D.T., An analysis of safety culture attitudes in a highly regulated environ-ment. Work Stress 16:1 (2002), 18–36.
Haukelid, K., Theories of (safety) culture revisited—An anthropological approach. Saf. Sci. 46 (2008), 413–426.
Healy, S., A ‘post-foundational’ interpretation of risk: Risk as ‘performance’. J. Risk Res. 7:3 (2004), 277–296, 10.1080/1366987042000176235.
Heller, Chaia, From Scientific Risk To Paysan Savoir-Faire: Peasant Expertise in the French and Global Debate over GM Crop. Science as Culture 11:1 (2002), 5–37 In press.
Henriqson, E., Schuler, B., Van Winsen, R., Dekker, S.W.A., The constitution and effects of safety culture as an object in the discourse of accident prevention: a Foucaldian approach. Saf. Sci. 70 (2014), 465–476.
Hessami, A.G., A systems framework for safety and security: the holistic paradigm. Syst. Eng. 7:2 (2004), 99–112, 10.1002/sys.10060.
Hofstede, G., Cultures And Organizations, Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival—Software of the Mind, the successful strategist series. 1994, Harper Collins Business.
Hollnagel, E. (2014). Safety I, safety II, The past and future of Safety Management. Ashgate Publishing.
Hopkins, A., Quiet Outrage: The way of a sociologist. 2016, Wolters Kluwers.
Hopkins, A., The use and abuse of “culture”. Safety cultures, Safety models: Tacking stock and moving forward, 2018, Springer Publishing, 35–45.
Huang, D.T., Clermont, G., Sexton, J.B., Karlo, C.A., Miller, R.G., Weissfeld, L.A., Rowan, K.M., Angus, D.C., Perceptions of safety culture vary across the intensive care units of a single institution. Crit. Care Med. 35 (2007), 165–176.
IAEA. (1986). INSAG-1: The Chernobyl Accident. International Atomic Energy Agency.
IAEA. (1991). Safety Culture (Safety Series No 75- INSAG-4). International Atomic Energy Agency.
IAEA, Measures to improve the security of nuclear materials and other radioactive materials. GOV/2001/41. General Conference IAEA, 2001.
IAEA. (2007). Safety Glossary. International Atomic Energy Agency.
IAEA. (2008a). Nuclear Security Culture. International Atomic Energy Agency.
IAEA. (2008b). SCART GUIDELINES. Reference report for IAEA Safety Culture Assessment Review Team (SCART). International Atomic Energy Agency.
IAEA. (2009). Culture de sécurité nucléaire. Collection Sécurité nucléaire de l'AIEA N°7. International Atomic Energy Agency.
IAEA, IAEA Safety Glossary. Terminology used in nuclear safety and radiation protection, 2016, International Atomic Energy Agency.
IAEA, Management of the interface between nuclear safety and security for research reactors. 2016, International Atomic Energy Agency.
IAEA, Management of the Interface between Nuclear Safety and Security for Research Reactors. 2019, International Atomic Energy Agency.
Jasanoff, S., States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. 2004, Routledge.
Jasanoff, S., Vulnerability and Development-Bhopal's Lasting Legacy. Hommels, A., Mesman, J., Bijker, W.E., (eds.) Vulnerability in Technological Cultures: New Directions in Research and Governance, 2014, The MIT Press, 89–108.
Joly, P.-B., Governing Emerging Technologies – The need to think out of the (black) box. Hilgartner, In S., Miller, C.A., Hagendijk, R., (eds.) Science and Democracy—Making Knowledge and Making Power in the Biosciences and Beyond, 2015, Routledge.
Jore, S. H. (2016). Security culture—A sufficient explanation for a terrorist attack? In T. Bedford & M. Revie, Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovation Theory and Practice (pp. 467–474). Taylor & Francis Group.
Jore, S. H. (2017). Safety and security- Is there a need for an integrated approach? In L. Walls, M. Revie, & T. Bedford, Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice (pp. 852–859). Taylor & Francis Group.
Jore, S.H., The conceptual and scientific demarcation of security in contrast to safety. European J. Security Res. 4 (2019), 157–174.
Keesing, R.M., Anthropology as interpretive quest. Current Anthropology 28 (1987), 161–176.
Keesing, R. M. (1994). Theories of culture revisited. In R. Borofsky, Assessing cultural anthropology: Vol. Vol. XIX (p. 566s). McGraw-Hill.
Keller, L.W., Schaper, K.L., Johnson, C.D., A hazardous materials identification system for the coatings and resins industry. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 41:12 (1980), 901–907 In press.
Khripunov, I., Kim, D., Time to think safety and security. Korean Times., 2008 http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2011/08/137_92394.html.
Kim, D., Kang, J., Where nuclear safety and security meet. Bull. Atomic Scientists 68:1 (2012), 86–93.
Koenick, S. (2011). Safety and Security Interface. International Atomic Energy Agency.
Kono, T., Corporate culture and long-range planning. Long Range Plan. 23:4 (1990), 9–19, 10.1016/0024-6301(90)90148-W.
Krackhardt, D., Kilduff, M., Friendship patterns and culture: the control of organization diversity. American Anthropologist, 92(1), 1990.
Latour, B., Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. 1987, Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law, Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (pp. 225–258). MIT Press.
Latour, B., Reassembling the Social: An introduction to Actor-Network Theory. 2005, Oxford University Press.
Le Coze, J.C., New models for new times. An anti-dualist move. Safety Sci. 59 (2013), 200–218.
Le Coze, J.C., How safety culture can make us think. Saf. Sci. 118 (2019), 221–229.
Lee, T., & Harrison, K. (2000). Assessing Safety Culture in Nuclear Power Stations. Safety Science, 34(1–3), 61–97. https://doi.org//10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00007-2.
Lundberg, C.C., Surfacing organisational culture. J. Managerial Psychology 5:4 (1990), 19–26.
Mainz, J., Relationalität und räumliche dynamik von risiken—Ein bioterroristisches szenario aus der perspektive der actor-network theory, 2008, Spektrum, 411–419.
Malcolmson, J. (2009). What is security culture? Does it differ in content from general organisational culture? 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCST.2009.5335511.
Martin, J. (1985). Can organizational culture be managed? In P. J. Frost, Organizational Culture (p. 419 s). Sage Publications.
Naevestad, T.-O., Mapping Research on culture and Safety in High-Risk Organizations: Arguments for a Sociotechnical Understanding of Safety Culture. J. Contingencies Crisis Management 7:2 (2009), 126–136.
Neisser, F.M., “Riskscapes” and risk management—Review and synthesis of an actor-network theory approach. Risk Management 16:2 (2014), 88–120.
OECD/NEA/FSC. (2013). Stakeholder Confidence in Radioactive Waste Management – An Annotated Glossary of Key Terms. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency.
Open Risk Manual. (Unknown). Four eyes principle [Collaborative website]. Open Risk Manual. https://www.openriskmanual.org/wiki/Four_Eyes_Principle.
NRC. Safety culture policy statement. NUREG/BR-500, Rev. 4. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2018 In press.
Osaci, M., Cristea, A.D., Ghuzan, D., Berdie, D.A., SAP authorization based on the four eyes principle. Int. J. Eng. 26 (2018), 43–46.
Pidgeon, N., Safety culture and risk management in organizations. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 22:1 (1991), 129–140.
Pidgeon, N., Safety culture: key theoretical issues. Work Stress 12 (1998), 202–216.
Pohler, W., & Schillmeier, M. (2010). Ein globales risikoereignis. In M. Holzinger, S. May, & W. Pohler, Weltrisikkeggesellscheft als Ausnahmezustand (pp. 121–151). Velbrück Wissenschaft.
Reason, J., Achieving a safe culture: theory and practice. Work Stress 12:3 (1998), 293–306.
Reniers, G.L.L., Cremer, K., Buytaert, J., Continuously and simultaneously optimizing an organization's safety and security culture and climate: The Improvement Diamond for Excellence Achievement and Leadership in Safety & Security (IDEAL S&S) model. J. Cleaner Prod. 19 (2011), 1239–1249, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.002.
Richter, A., Koch, C., Integration, differentiation and ambiguity in safety cultures. Saf. Sci. 42 (2004), 703–722.
Rochlin, G.I., Safe operation as a social construct. Ergonomics 42:11 (1999), 1549–1560, 10.1080/001401399184884.
Rollenhagen, C., Can focus on safety culture become an excuse for not rethinking design of technology?. Saf. Sci. 48 (2010), 268–278.
Schein, E.H., Organizational Culture and Leadership, 14, 1985, Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Schikora, J., Bringing the four-eyes-principle to the lab. Experim. Tests Theories Inst., D13–V2, 2010, 58.
Schnieder, L., Schnieder, E., & Ständer, T. (2009). Railway Safety and Security – Two Sides of the Same Coin? ! International Railway Safety Council.
Scoles, J., Researching ‘messy objects’: How can boundary objects strengthen the analytical pursuit of an actor-network theory study?. Studies Continuing Education 40:3 (2018), 273–289, 10.1080/0158037X.2018.1456416.
Shapin, S., Schaffer, S., Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. 1985, Princeton University Press.
Slovic, P., Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. Krimsky, In S., Golding, D., (eds.) Social theories of Risk, 1992, Praeger Publishers, 117–152.
Strum, S.S., Latour, Bruno, Redefining the social link: from baboons to humans. Soc. Sci. Inform. 26:4 (1987), 783–802, 10.1177/053901887026004004 In press.
Su, Teh-Sheng, Hu, I-Yuang, Perception towards chemical labeling for college students in Taiwan using Globally Harmonized System. Safe. Sci. 46:9 (2008), 1385–1392, 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.09.002 In press.
The Hague Nuclear Security Summit. (2014). Communiqué.
Tompson, P., Mchugh, D., Work Organisations. 2002, Palgrave.
Vaughan, Diane, The Challenger Launch Decision. Risky technology, culture and deviance at NASA, 1996, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1–575 In press.
Wang, An-Hsiang, Chi, Chun-Cheng, Effects of hazardous material symbol labeling and training on comprehension according to three types of educational specialization. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 31:5 (2003), 343–355, 10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00236-6 In press.
Willems, W., How to do things with knowledge: An interview with Sheila Jasanoff. Krisis- J. Contremp. Philosophy 2 (2014), 40–46.
Yoo, H., Lee, J.-H., Results of nuclear security culture survey on personnel at nuclear power plants. Ann. Nucl. Energy 85 (2015), 398–402.