[en] The Hycel Diagnostics Diana-5, a compact 5-part differential hematology analyzer, was evaluated in the hematology laboratory of Liège University Hospital, Belgium. Within-and between-batch precision, linearity, and absence of carryover were all excellent. All parameters were stable for 48 hours at 4 ° C and for 8 hours at room temperature. Comparability of complete blood counts to Bayer Technicon Advia 120 measurements was highly satisfactory, with the exception of the mean cell volume, which was slightly underestimated by the Diana-5 compared to the Advia 120. Comparisons of differential leukocyte counts to 400-cell microscopic differentials were excellent for neutrophils, lymphocytes, and eosinophils and were acceptable for monocytes. The efficiency of the flagging system was high for the detection of blasts and less satisfactory for the detection of immature granulocytes and atypical lymphocytes. The instrument was reliable and easy to use.
Disciplines :
Hematology
Author, co-author :
Boemer, François ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Génétique
England JM, Rowan RM, van Assendelft OW, et al. International Council for Standardization in Haematology, prepared by the ICSH Expert Panel on Cytometry. Guidelines for the evaluation of blood analysers including those used for differential leucocyte and reticulocyte counting and cell marker applications. Clin Lab Haematol. 1994;16:157-174.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. NCCLS Approved Standard H20-A; Reference Leukocyte Differential Count (Proportional) and Evaluation of Instrumental Methods. Villanova, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1992.
Sachse C, Jahns-Streubel G, Henkel E. First clinical evaluation of the CELL-DYN 3200 haematology analyser. Clin Lab Haematol. 1998;20:333-340.
Goossens W, Van Hove L, Verwilghen RL. Monocyte counting: discrepancies in results obtained with different automated instruments. J Clin Pathol. 1991;44:224-227.
Bentley SA, Johnson A, Bishop CA. A parallel evaluation of four automated hematology analyzers. Am J Clin Pathol. 1993;100: 626-632.
Buttarello M, Gadotti M, Lorenz C, et al. Evaluation of four automated hematology analyzers: a comparative study of differential counts (imprecision and inaccuracy). Am J Clin Pathol. 1992; 97:345-352.
Groner W, Simson E. Modern Hematology Analyzers. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons; 1995:170.