Themes and Research Directions in Privacy-Sensitive Robotics

Rueben, M.; Aroyo, A. M.; Lutz, C.; Schmolz, J.; Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter; Corti, A.; Agrawal, S.; Smart, W. D.

doi:10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625758

Download

Paper published in a journal (Scientific congresses and symposiums)

Themes and Research Directions in Privacy-Sensitive Robotics

Rueben, M.; Aroyo, A. M.; Lutz, C. et al.

2019 • In Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, 2018-September, p. 77-84

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/250253

DOI
10.1109/ARSO.2018.8625758

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Privacy-Sensitive-Robotics_ARSO-2018.pdf

Publisher postprint (133.23 kB)

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Data privacy; Robotics; Legal issues; Privacy concerns; Roadmap; Robotics research; Economic and social effects

Abstract :

[en] Privacy is crucial for healthy relationships, but robots will impact our privacy in new ways - this warrants a new area of research. This paper presents work from the first workshop on privacy-sensitive robotics. We identify the seven research themes that should comprise privacy-sensitive robotics research in the near future: data privacy; manipulation and deception; trust; blame and transparency; legal issues; domains with special privacy concerns; and privacy theory. We intend for the research directions proposed for each of these themes to serve as a roadmap for privacy-sensitive robotics research. © 2018 IEEE.

Disciplines :

European & international law

Author, co-author :

Rueben, M.; Robotics Program at Oregon State University, United States

Aroyo, A. M.; Department of Robotics, Brain and Cognitive Sciences at Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Italy

Lutz, C.; Department of Communication and Culture, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway

Schmolz, J.; Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Coburg University, Germany

Van Cleynenbreugel, Pieter ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de droit > Droit matériel européen

Corti, A.; Technische Bürgernetzwerk, Austria

Agrawal, S.; Mechanical Engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India

Smart, W. D.; Collaborative Robotics and Intelligent Systems (CoRIS) Institute, Oregon State University, United States

Language :

English

Title :

Themes and Research Directions in Privacy-Sensitive Robotics

Publication date :

2019

Event name :

2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, ARSO 2018

Event date :

27 September 2018 through 28 September 2018

Audience :

International

Journal title :

Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts

ISSN :

2162-7568

eISSN :

2162-7576

Publisher :

IEEE Computer Society

Volume :

2018-September

Pages :

77-84

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Commentary :

144616 9781538680377

Available on ORBi :

since 25 August 2020

Statistics

Number of views

62 (5 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

14 (2 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

I. Altman, "Privacy Regulation: Culturally Universal or Culturally Specific?" Journal of Social Issues, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 66-84, 1977.
J. C. Inness, Privacy, intimacy, and isolation. Oxford University Press, 1992.
R. Calo, "Robots and privacy, " Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, Patrick Lin, George Bekey, and Keith Abney, eds., Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.
S. Petronio, "Communication boundary management: A theoretical model of managing disclosure of private information between marital couples, " Communication Theory, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 311-335, 1991.
H. Nissenbaum, "Privacy as contextual integrity, " Wash. L. Rev., vol. 79, p. 119, 2004.
M. Rueben, C. M. Grimm, F. J. Bernieri, and W. D. Smart, "A taxonomy of privacy constructs for privacy-sensitive robotics, " arXiv: 1701. 00841v1 [cs. CY].
J. DeCew, "Privacy, " in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2013 ed., E. N. Zalta, Ed., 2013.
A. D. Moore, "Privacy: its meaning and value, " American Philosophical Quarterly, pp. 215-227, 2003.
I. Altman, The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 1975.
L. Austin, "Privacy and the Question of Technology, " Law and Philosophy, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 119-166, 2003.
B.-J. Koops, B. C. Newell, T. Timan, I. Skorvanek, T. Chokrevski, and M. Galic, "A typology of privacy, " U. Pa. J. Int'l L., vol. 38, p. 483, 2016.
D. S. Syrdal, M. L. Walters, N. Otero, K. L. Koay, and K. Dautenhahn, "He knows when you are sleeping-privacy and the personal robot companion, " in Workshop on the Human Implications of Human-Robot Interaction, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI '07), 2007, pp. 28-33.
K. Caine, S. Sabanovic, and M. Carter, "The Effect of Monitoring by Cameras and Robots on the Privacy Enhancing Behaviors of Older Adults, " in Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ser. HRI '12. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2012, pp. 343-350.
R. Y. Wong and D. K. Mulligan, "These aren't the autonomous drones you're looking for: investigating privacy concerns through concept videos, " Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 26-54, 2016.
T. Denning, C. Matuszek, K. Koscher, J. R. Smith, and T. Kohno, "A spotlight on security and privacy risks with future household robots: attacks and lessons, " in Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. ACM, 2009, pp. 105-114.
M. K. Lee, K. P. Tang, J. Forlizzi, and S. Kiesler, "Understanding users' perception of privacy in human-robot interaction, " in 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 2011, pp. 181-182.
A. Hubers, E. Andrulis, L. Scott, T. Stirrat, R. Zhang, R. Sowell, M. Rueben, C. M. Grimm, and W. D. Smart, "Using video manipulation to protect privacy in remote presence systems, " in International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 2015, pp. 245-254.
D. Butler, J. Huang, F. Roesner, and M. Cakmak, "The Privacy-Utility Tradeoff for Remotely Teleoperated Robots, " in Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Portland, OR, 2015.
J. Klow, J. Proby, M. Rueben, R. T. Sowell, C. M. Grimm, and W. D. Smart, "Privacy, utility, and cognitive load in remote presence systems, " in Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2017, pp. 167-168.
M. Rueben, F. J. Bernieri, C. M. Grimm, and W. D. Smart, "Evaluation of physical marker interfaces for protecting visual privacy from mobile robots, " in Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2016). IEEE, 2016, pp. 787-794.
A. R. Wagner, "An autonomous architecture that protects the right to privacy, " in Proceedings of AAAI/ACM Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Society. AAAI, 2018.
M. Rueben, F. J. Bernieri, C. M. Grimm, and W. D. Smart, "Framing effects on privacy concerns about a home telepresence robot, " in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2017, pp. 435-444.
M. Tonkin, J. Vitale, S. Ojha, J. Clark, S. Pfeiffer, W. Judge, X. Wang, and M.-A. Williams, "Embodiment, privacy and social robots: May I remember you?" in International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 2017, pp. 506-515.
J. Vitale, M. Tonkin, S. Herse, S. Ojha, J. Clark, M.-A. Williams, X. Wang, and W. Judge, "Be more transparent and users will like you: A robot privacy and user experience design experiment, " in Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, 2018, pp. 379-387.
M. M. Krupp, M. Rueben, C. M. Grimm, and W. D. Smart, "A focus group study of privacy concerns about telepresence robots, " in Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2017). IEEE, 2017.
M. R. Calo, "The drone as a privacy catalyst, " Stan. L. Rev. Online, vol. 64, p. 29, 2011.
M. E. Kaminski, "Robots in the home: What will we have agreed to?" Idaho L. Rev., vol. 51, p. 661, 2014.
M. E. Kaminski, M. Rueben, W. D. Smart, and C. M. Grimm, "Averting robot eyes, " Md. L. Rev., vol. 76, p. 983, 2016.
C. Lutz and A. Tamò, "Robocode-ethicists: Privacy-friendly robots, an ethical responsibility of engineers?" in Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference. ACM, 2015, p. 21.
-, "Privacy and healthcare robots-an ANT analysis, " in We Robot 2016: the Fifth Annual Conference on Legal and Policy Issues relating to Robotics. University of Miami School of Law, 2016, Discussant: Matt Beane, University of California Santa Barbara.
T. Schulz and J. Herstad, "Walking away from the robot: Negotiating privacy with a robot, " in Proceedings of British HCI Conference (BISL), 2017, pp. 1-6.
E. Sedenberg, J. Chuang, and D. Mulligan, "Designing commercial therapeutic robots for privacy preserving systems and ethical research practices within the home, " International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 575-587, 2016.
M. Rueben and W. D. Smart, "Privacy in human-robot interaction: Survey and future work, " in We Robot 2016: the Fifth Annual Conference on Legal and Policy Issues relating to Robotics. University of Miami School of Law, 2016, Discussant: Ashkan Soltani, Independent Researcher.
G. Hu, W. P. Tay, and Y. Wen, "Cloud robotics: architecture, challenges and applications, " IEEE network, vol. 26, no. 3, 2012.
J. J. Trinckes, Jr., "Section 2. 6: Social Engineering and HIPAA, " in The Definitive Guide to Complying with the HIPAA/HITECH Privacy and Security Rules. Auerbach Publications, 2012, p. 472.
A. M. Aroyo, F. Rea, G. Sandini, and A. Sciutti, "Trust and Social Engineering in Human Robot Interaction: Will a Robot Make You Disclose Sensitive Information, Conform to its Recommendations or Gamble?" IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, no [in press], 2018.
S. Booth, J. Tompkin, H. Pfister, J. Waldo, K. Gajos, and R. Nagpal, "Piggybacking Robots: Human-Robot Overtrust in University Dormitory Security, " in Proceedings of the twelfth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction-HRI '17, 2017, pp. 426-434.
S. Gibbs, "Hackers can hijack Wi-Fi Hello Barbie to spy on your children, " 2015 [Online]. Available: https://www. theguardian. com/technology/2015/nov/26/hackerscan-hijack-wi-fi-hello-barbie-to-spy-on-your-children
L. Franceschi-Bicchierai, "How This Internet of Things Stuffed Animal Can Be Remotely Turned Into a Spy Device, " 2017 [Online]. Available: https://motherboard. vice. com/en us/article/qkm48b/howthis-internet-of-things-teddy-bear-can-be-remotely-turned-into-a-spydevice
A. Cavoukian, Privacy by Design: The 7 Foundational Principles. Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, 2016, http://www. privacybydesign. ca/index. php/about-pbd/7-foundationalprinciples/.
W. N. Hartzog, "Et Tu, Android? Regulating Dangerous and Dishonest Robots, " Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 70, 2016.
N. Richards and W. Hartzog, "Taking trust seriously in privacy law, " Stan. Tech. L. Rev., vol. 19, p. 431, 2015.
D. M. Rousseau, S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, and C. Camerer, "Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust, " Academy of management review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 393-404, 1998.
D. H. McKnight, V. Choudhury, and C. Kacmar, "Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology, " Information systems research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 334-359, 2002.
P. A. Hancock, D. R. Billings, K. E. Schaefer, J. Y. C. Chen, E. J. de Visser, and R. Parasuraman, "A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction, " Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 517-527, 2011.
E. Buyuksagis and H. V. B. Willem, "Strict liability in European codification. Torn between objects, activities and their risks, " Geo. J. Int'l L. 44, p. 609, 2012.
H. Farber, "To testify or not to testify: A comparative analysis of Australian and American approaches to a parent-child testimonial exemption, " Tex. Int'l LJ, vol. 46, p. 109, 2010.
D. J. Solove and W. Hartzog, "The FTC and the new common law of privacy, " Colum. L. Rev., vol. 114, p. 583, 2014.
D. Simshaw, N. Terry, K. Hauser, and M. Cummings, "Regulating healthcare robots: Maximizing opportunities while minimizing risks, " Rich. JL & Tech., vol. 22, p. 1, 2015.
S. Barth and M. D. T. De Jong, "The Privacy Paradox-Investigating Discrepancies between Expressed Privacy Concerns and Actual Online Behavior-A Systematic Literature Review, " Telematics and Informatics, vol. 34, pp. 1038-1058, 2017.
L. Baruh, E. Secinti, and Z. Cemalcilar, "Online Privacy Concerns and Privacy Management: A Meta-Analytical Review, " Journal of Communication, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 26-53, 2017.
S. Kokolakis, "Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon, " Computers & Security, vol. 64, pp. 122-134, 2017.
H. J. Smith, T. Dinev, and H. Xu, "Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review, " MIS quarterly, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 989-1016, 2011.
A. E. Marwick and D. Boyd, "Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media, " New Media & Society, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1051-1067, 2014.
T. Dinev and P. Hart, "An extended privacy calculus model for ecommerce transactions, " Information Systems Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 61-80, 2006.
J. E. Campbell and M. Carlson, "Panopticon. com: Online Surveillance and the Commodification of Privacy, " Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 586-606, 2002.
A. R. Beresford, D. Kübler, and S. Preibusch, "Unwillingness to pay for privacy: A field experiment, " Economics Letters, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 25-27, 2012.
D. J. Solove, Understanding privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.