Disabled pedestrian level of service method for evaluating and promoting inclusive walking facilities on urban streets

Analytical point system; Disabled pedestrian; Inclusive walking conditions; Level of service; Street evaluation; Analytical method; International standards; Practical model; Walking facilities; Transportation; Civil engineering; Singapore [Southeast Asia]

Abstract :

[en] Current analytical methods to estimate the pedestrian level of service (PLOS) usually only consider a narrow range of pedestrians and may not be applicable for more diverse pedestrian populations with different characteristics. The aim of this study is to conceptualize the disabled pedestrian level of service (DPLOS) for different street hierarchies not previously addressed to ensure inclusive walking conditions. An analytical point system comparing existing pedestrian facilities to a standard is proposed to estimate the DPLOS. Although this practical model is only used for one case study in Singapore, the use of international standards would make this model universally applicable. © 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Disciplines :

Regional & inter-regional studies
Civil engineering
Architecture
Special economic topics (health, labor, transportation...)

Author, co-author :

Asadi-Shekari, Z.; Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia

Moeinaddini, Mehdi ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > Transports et mobilité

Shah, M. Z.; Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia

Language :

English

Title :

Disabled pedestrian level of service method for evaluating and promoting inclusive walking facilities on urban streets

Publication date :

2013

Journal title :

Journal of Transportation Engineering

ISSN :

0733-947X

Publisher :

American Society of Civil Engineers, United States - New York

Volume :

139

Issue :

Pages :

181-192

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 06 August 2020

Statistics

Number of views

50 (2 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

2 (2 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Abdi-Daneshpour, Z. (2006). Urban environment adaptation for disabled people, University of Olum Behzisti va Tavanbakhshi, Tehran, Iran.
Access Board. (2002). "Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities." U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers, Compliance Board (Access Board), Washington, DC.
Access Minneapolis. (2008). "Design guidelines for streets and sidewalks." The Minneapolis Department of Public Works, Minneapolis, MN.
Asadi-Shekari, Z., and Zaly Shah, M. (2011). "Practical evaluation method for pedestrian level of service in urban streets." Proc., Int. Conf. on Transport Research, Penang, Malaysia.
Ashland City Council. (1999). Street standard handbook, Department of Community Development, Ashland, OR.
Azizi, H., Momeni, M., and Taghinia, M. (2011). "Quality of life indices assessment for disabled and elderly people: Case study of Tehran." Proc., 16th Int. Conf. on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning, Essen, Germany, 755-766.
Benz, G. P. (1986). Pedestrian time-space concept: A new approach to the planning and design of pedestrian facilities, Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, New York.
Brown, A. L., Khattak, A. J., and Rodriguez, D. A. (2008). "Neighbourhood types, travel and body mass: A study of new urbanist and suburban neighbourhoods in the US." Urban Stud., 45(4), 963-988.
Buehler, R., and Pucher, J. (2011). "Sustainable transport in Freiburg: Lessons from Germany's environmental capital." Int. J. Sustainable Transp., 5(1), 43-70.
Bureau of the Census. (1997). "Disabilities affect one-fifth of all Americans: Proportion could increase in coming decades." Census brief, Issue 97, Part 5, U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Washington, DC.
Cao, X., Handy, S. L., and Mokhtarian, P. L. (2006). "The influences of the built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behavior: Evidence from Austin, TX." Transportation, 33(1), 1-20.
Charlotte Department of Transportation (CDOT). (2007). "Charlotte's urban street design guideline." Charlotte, NC.
City of Aurora. (2007). "Aurora urban street standards in transit: Oriented developments and urban centers." Aurora, CO.
City of Calgary. (2008). "Pedestrian policy and design report." Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
City of Charles Sturt. (2009). "Engineering and open space development guidelines-Road and path design guidelines." Charles Sturt, South Australia.
City of Tacoma. (2009). "Mobility master plan bicycle and pedestrian design guidelines." Tacoma mobility master plan 1, Tacoma, WA.
City of Whittlesea. (2009). "City of Whittlesea development guidelines." Victoria, Australia.
Clifton, K. J., and Dill, J. (2005). "Women's travel behavior and land use: Will new styles of neighborhoods lead to more women walking?" Proc., Conf. on Research on Women's Issues in Transportation, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 89-99.
Coffin, A., and Morrall, J. (1995). "Walking speeds of elderly pedestrians at crosswalks." Transportation Research Record 1487, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 63-67.
Daamen, W. (2004). Modelling passenger flows in public transport facilities, DUP Science, Delft, the Netherlands.
Davidson, K. (2006). "Designing a walkable suburban landscape: New urbanism and light rail as methodologies." Master of Landscape Architecture, Master's thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
Delcan. (2008). "City of Ottawa road corridor planning and design guidelines." Delcan, Planning Partnership, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Dixon, L. (1996). "Bicycle and pedestrian level-of-service performance measures and standards for congestion management systems." Transportation Research Record 1538, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1-9.
Ewing, R., and Cervero, R. (2001). "Travel and the built environment: A synthesis." Transportation Research Record 1780, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 87-114.
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). (2009). "Quality/level of service." Tallahassee, FL.
Fruin, J. J. (1971). "Pedestrian planning and design." Metropolitan Associations of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners, New York.
Gallin, N. (2001). "Pedestrian friendliness-Guidelines for assessing pedestrian level of service." Proc., Australia: Walking the 21st Century Conf., Perth, Australia.
Henson, C. (2000). "Levels of service for pedestrians." ITE J., 70(9), 26-30.
Heramb, C., Acting Commissioner. (2007). "Street and site plan design standards." Chicago Department of Transportation, Chicago.
Jensen, S. (2007). "Pedestrian and bicycle level of service on road way segments." Transportation Research Record 2031, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 43-51.
Khisty, C. J. (1994). "Evaluation of pedestrian facilities: Beyond the level-of-service concept." Transportation Research Record 1438, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 45-50.
Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P. L., and Laidet, L. (1997). "A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in San Francisco Bay Area." Transp., 24(2), 125-158.
Lam, W. H. K., Morrall, J. F., and Ho, H. (1995). "Pedestrian flow characteristics in Hong Kong." Transportation Research Record 1487, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 56-62.
Landis, B., Vattikuti, V., Ottenberg, R., McLeod, D., and Guttenplan, M. (2001). "Modeling the roadside walking environment: A pedestrian level of service." Transportation Research Record 1773, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 82-88.
Lautso, K., and Murole, P. (1974). "A study of pedestrian traffic in Helsinki: Methods and results." Traffic Eng. Control, 15(9), 446-449.
Lee, J. Y. S., and Lam, W. H. K. (2003). "Levels of service for stairway in Hong Kong underground stations." J. Transp. Eng., 129(2), 196-202.
Leverson Boodlal, P. E. (2001). "Accessible sidewalks and street crossings." U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
LUTRAQ. (1993). "LUTRAQ: Making the land use, transportation, air quality connection." The pedestrian environment, Vol. 4A, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas with Cambridge Systematics, Berkeley, CA.
Mateo-Babiano, I., and Ieda, H. (2007). "Street space sustainability in Asia: The role of the Asian pedestrian and street culture." J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud., 7, 1915-1930.
Miller, J. S., Bigelow, J., and Garber, N. J. (2000). "Calibrating pedestrian level-of-service metrics with 3-D visualization." Transportation Research Record 1705, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 9-15.
Minnesota Department of Transportation. (2010). Mn/DOT road design manual, St. Paul, MN.
Morrall, J. F., Ratnayake, L. L., and Seneviratne, P. N. (1991). "Comparison of central business district pedestrian characteristics in Canada and Srilanka." Transportation Research Record 1294, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 57-61.
Mozer, D. (1994). "Calculating multi-mode levels-of-service." International Bicycle Fund, Seattle, WA.
Narrabri Shire Council. (2001). "New South Wales development design specification: Geometric road design." New South Wales, Australia.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program. (NCHRP). (2008). "Multimodal level of service analysis for urban streets." Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Neighborhood Streets Project Stakeholders. (2000). "Neighborhood street design guidelines: An Oregon guide for reducing street widths." Stakeholder Design Team, Oregon.
New York City Department of Transportation. (2009). "Street design manual." New York.
Papworth Trust. (2011). "Disability in the United Kingdom: Facts and figures." Bernard Sunley Centre, Papworth Everard, Cambridge CB23-3RG, UK.
Petritsch, T. A., et al. (2006). "Pedestrian level-of-service model for urban arterial facilities with sidewalks." Transportation Research Record 1982, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 84-89.
Pima County. (2005). "Subdivision and development street standards." Pima County, AZ.
Pushkarev, B., and Zupan, J. M. (1971). "Pedestrian travel demand." Highway Research Record 355, Highway Research Board,Washington, DC, 37-53.
Pushkarev, B., and Zupan, J. M. (1975). Urban space for pedestrians: A report of the regional plan association, MIT Press, Cambridge, 127-129.
Sarkar, S. (1993). "Determination of service levels for pedestrians, with European example." Transportation Research Record 1405, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 35-42.
Sarkar, S. (2002). "Qualitative evaluation of comfort needs in urban walkways in major activity centers." Annual meeting 2003 (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Seneviratne, P. N., and Morrall, J. F. (1985a). "Level of service on pedestrian facilities." Transp. Q., 39(1), 109-123.
Seneviratne, P. N., and Morrall, J. F. (1985b). "Analysis of factors affecting the choice of route of pedestrians." Transp. Plann. Technol., 10(2), 147-159.
Shriver, K. (1997). "Influence of environmental design on pedestrian travel behavior in four Austin neighborhoods." Transportation Research Record 1578, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 64-75.
Singh, K., and Jain, P. K. (2011). "Methods of assessing pedestrian level of service." J. Eng. Res. Stud., 2(1), 116-124.
Sisiopiku, V. P., and Akin, D. (2003). "Pedestrian behaviours at and perceptions towards various pedestrian facilities: An examination based on observation and survey data." Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 6(4), 249-274.
Staplin, L., Lococo, K. H., McKnight, A. J., McKnight, A. S., and Odenheimer, G. L. (1998). Intersection negotiation problems of older drivers. Volume II: Background synthesis on age and intersection driving difficulties, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
Sutherland, A., and Morrish, G. (2006). Street design guidelines, A. Petersen, ed., Landcom, Parramatta, Australia.
Tan, D., Wang, W., Lu, J., and Bian, Y. (2007). "Research on methods of assessing pedestrian level of service for sidewalk." J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol., 7(5), 74-79.
Tanaboriboon, Y., and Guyano, J. A. (1989). "Level-of-service standards for pedestrian facilities in Bangkok: A case study." ITE J., 59(11), 39-41.
Transportation Research Board. (2000). "Highway capacity manual 2000." Washington, DC.
Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure (Plg. and Engg.) Centre (UTTIPEC). (2009). Pedestrian design guidelines, Delhi Development Authority, New Delhi.
United States Access Board. (2002). "Guidelines for accessible public rights-of-way." Washington, DC.
Vanderslice, E. (1998). Portland pedestrian design guide, Office of Transportation Engineering and Development, Portland, OR.