Do typically and atypically developing children learn and generalize novel names similarly: the role of conceptual distance during learning and at test
[en] There is a large body of evidence showing that comparison of multiple stimuli leads to better conceptualization and generalization of novel names than no-comparison settings in typically developing (TD) children (e.g., Gentner, 2010). By contrast, the evidence regarding this issue remains scarce in children with intellectual disabilities (ID). Children with intellectual disabilities (ID) and TD children matched on mental age with the Raven’s coloured progressive matrices (RCPM: Raven, 1965) were tested in several novel name learning comparison conditions, with familiar objects. We manipulated the conceptual distance between the learning stimuli in the learning phase and between the learning and generalization phase stimuli for object and relational nouns. Results showed that both populations had rather similar performance profile when matched on their cognitive skills (low- vs. high-functioning). Unexpectedly, ID children’s performance was equivalent for relations and better for objects compared to their TD peers’ performance. However, when controlling for chronological age, the difference between ID and TD children disappeared in the case of object categories and was better understood by TD children in the case of relations. We discuss the role of conceptual distance on participants’ conceptual generalization as a function of their intellectual abilities and cognitive functioning
Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Author, co-author :
Witt, Arnaud; Université de Bourgogne > Psychologie - LEAD
Comblain, Annick ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Logopédie > Langage, handicaps et troubles neuro-développementaux
Thibaut, Jean-Pierre; Université de Bourgogne > Psychologie - LEAD
Language :
English
Title :
Do typically and atypically developing children learn and generalize novel names similarly: the role of conceptual distance during learning and at test
Alfieri, L., Nokes-Malach, T.J., Schunn, C.D., Learning through case comparisons: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist 48:2 (2013), 87–113.
Augier, L., Thibaut, J.P., The benefits and costs of comparisons in a novel object categorization task: Interactions with development. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2 (2013), 1126–1132.
Barrett, M.D., Diniz, F.A., Lexical development in mentally handicapped children. Language and Communication in Mentally Handicapped People, 1989, 3–32.
Biggs, E.E., Carter, E.W., Gilson, C.B., Systematic review of interventions involving aided AAC modeling for children with complex communication needs. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 123:5 (2018), 443–473.
Chapman, R.S., Language development in children and adolescents with Down syndrom. In P. Fletcher, & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), The handbook of child language (pp. 641–663). Oxford, UK: Blackwell., 1995.
Chapman, R.S., Schwartz, S.E., Bird, E.K.R., Language skills of children and adolescents with Down syndrome: I. Comprehension. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 34:5 (1991), 1106–1120.
Childers, J.B., Paik, J.H., Korean- and English-speaking children use cross-situational information to learn novel predicate terms. Journal of Child Language, 36(01), 2009, 201.
Fazio, B.B., Johnston, J.R., Brandl, L., Relation between mental age and vocabulary development among children with mild mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation 97:5 (1993), 541–546.
Fenson, L., Dale, P.S., Reznick, J.S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J.P., et al. The MacArthur communicative development inventories: User's guide and technical manual. 1993, Singular, San Diego.
Foreman, P., Crews, G., Using augmentative communication with infants and young children with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice 5:1 (1998), 16–25.
Gentner, D., Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems. Cognitive Science 34:5 (2010), 752–775.
Gentner, D., Namy, L.L., Comparison in the development of categories. Cognitive Development 14:4 (1999), 487–513.
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., Hung, B., Comparison facilitates children's learning of names for parts. Journal of Cognition and Development 8:3 (2007), 285–307.
Gentner, D., Anggoro, F.K., Klibanoff, R.S., Structure mapping and relational language support children's learning of relational categories. Child Development 82:4 (2011), 1173–1188.
Goldwater, M.B., Schalk, L., Relational categories as a bridge between cognitive and educational research. Psychological Bulletin 142:7 (2016), 729–757.
Hall, D.G., Waxman, S.R., Assumptions about word meaning: Individuation and basic-level kinds. Child Development 64:5 (1993), 1550–1570.
Harrison, R.H., Budoff, M., Greenberg, G., Differences between EMR and nonretarded children in fluency and quality of verbal associations. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 79:5 (1975), 583–591.
Hayes, B.K., Conway, R.N., Concept acquisition in children with mild intellectual disability: Factors affecting the abstraction of prototypical information. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 25:3 (2000), 217–234.
Hegarty, M., Learning from technical animated systems. Keynote communication. EARLI conference, SIG 2. Comprehension of text and Graphics. Rotterdam, Augusr 2015, 2015.
Hetzroni, O.E., Hessler, M., Shalahevich, K., Learning new relational categories by children with autism spectrum disorders, children with typical development and children with intellectual disabilities: Effects of comparison and familiarity on systematicity. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 63:6 (2019), 564–575.
Hupp, S.C., Use of multiple exemplars in object concept training: How many are sufficient?. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities 6:4 (1986), 305–317.
Hupp, S.C., Mervis, C.B., Acquisition of basic object categories by severely handicapped children. Child Development 53 (1982), 760–767.
Hupp, S.C., Mervis, C.B., Able, H., Conroy-Gunter, M., Effects of receptive and expressive training of category labels on generalized learning by severely mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 90 (1986), 58–65.
Kemler, D.G., Classification in young and retarded children: The primacy of overall similarity relations. Child Development, 1982, 768–779.
Landau, B., Smith, L.B., Jones, S.S., The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development 3:3 (1988), 299–321.
Lanfranchi, S., Jerman, O., Dal Pont, E., Alberti, A., Vianello, R., Executive function in adolescents with Down syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 54:4 (2010), 308–319.
Mervis, C.B., Early lexical development: The contributions of mother and child. Origins of cognitive skills. 1984, 339–370.
Mervis, C.B., Early conceptual development of children with Down syndrome. Children with Down syndrome: A developmental perspective. 1990, 252–301.
Murphy, G., The big book of concepts. 2004, MIT press.
Namy, L.L., Gentner, D., Making a silk purse out of two sow's ears : Young children's use of comparison in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology General 131 (2002), 5–15.
Postigo, Y., Pozo, J.I., On the Road to Graphicacy: The learning of graphical representation systems. Educational Psychology 24:5 (2004), 623–644.
Rattermann, M.J., Gentner, D., More evidence for a relational shift in the development of analogy: Children's performance on a causal-mapping task. Cognitive Development 13:4 (1998), 453–478.
Räty, L., Kontu, E.K., Pirttimaa, R., Teaching children with intellectual disabilities: Analysis of research-based recommendations. Journal of Education and Learning, 5, 2016.
Raven, J.C., RCPM: Guide to Using the Colored Progressive Matrices. New York, NY, Psychological Corp, 1965.
Richland, L.E., Morrison, R.G., Holyoak, K.J., Children's development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 94 (2006), 249–271.
Rosch, E., Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 104(3), 1975, 192.
Rosch, E., Principles of categorization. Rosh, E., Lloyd, B., (eds.) Cognition and categorization, 1978, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 169–215.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., Boyes-Braem, P., Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8:3 (1976), 382–439.
Schuiringa, H., van Nieuwenhuijzen, M., Orobio de Castro, B., Matthys, W., Executive functions and processing speed in children with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities and externalizing behavior problems. Child Neuropsychology 23:4 (2017), 442–462.
Tager-Flusberg, H., The conceptual basis for referential word meaning in children with autism. Child Development, 1985, 1167–1178.
Thibaut, J.P., Witt, A., Young children's learning of relational categories: Multiple comparisons and their cognitive constraints. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 2015, 643.
Thibaut, J.P., Witt, A., Generalizing novel names in comparison settings: Role of conceptual distance during learning and at test. Gunzelman, G., Howes, A., Tenbrink, T., Davelaar, E., (eds.) Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2017, 3314–3319.
Tager-Flusberg, H., Constraints on the representation of word meaning: Evidence from autistic and mentally retarded children. In The development of word meaning (pp. 69-81). Springer, New York, NY, 1986.
Thibaut, J.-P., Stansbury, E., Witt, A., Generalization of novel names for relations in comparison settings: The role of conceptual distance during learning and at test. Kalish, C., Rau, M., Rogers, T., Zhu, J., (eds.) Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2018, 1114–1119.
Waddington, H., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G.E., O'Reilly, M.F., Van der Meer, L., Carnett, A., et al. Three children with autism spectrum disorder learn to perform a three-step communication sequence using an iPad®-based speech-generating device. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 39 (2014), 59–67.
Waxman, S.R., Klibanoff, R.S., The role of comparison in the extension of novel adjectives. Developmental psychology 36:5 (2000), 571–581, 10.1037//O012-1649.36.5.571.
Zampini, L., Salvi, A., D'odorico, L., Joint attention behaviours and vocabulary development in children with Down syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 59:10 (2015), 891–901.
