Article (Scientific journals)
Can Low-Cost Unmanned Aerial Systems Describe the Forage Quality Heterogeneity? Insight from a Timothy Pasture Case Study in Southern Belgium
Michez, Adrien; Lejeune, Philippe; David, Knoden et al.
2020In Remote Sensing, 12 (10 1650)
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
remotesensing-12-01650-v3.pdf
Publisher postprint (2.74 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
unmanned aerial vehicles; unmanned aerial systems; drone; precision grazing; pasture biomass modeling; sward height; pasture height; forage quality; nutritive value
Abstract :
[en] Applied to grazing management, unmanned aerial systems (UASs) allow for the monitoring of vegetation at the level of each individual on the pasture while covering a significant area (>10 ha per flight). Few studies have investigated the use of UASs to describe the forage quality in terms of nutritive value or chemical composition, while these parameters are essential in supporting the productive functions of animals and are known to change in space (i.e., sward species and structure) and time (i.e., sward phenology). Despite interest, these parameters are scarcely assessed by practitioners as they usually require important laboratory analyses. In this context, our study investigates the potential of off-the-shelf UAS systems in modeling essential parameters of pasture productivity in a precision livestock context: sward height, biomass, and forage quality. In order to develop a solution which is easily reproducible for the research community, we chose to avoid expensive solutions such as UAS LiDAR (light detection and ranging) or hyperspectral sensors, as well as comparing several UAS acquisition strategies (sensors and view angles). Despite their low cost, all tested strategies provide accurate height, biomass, and forage quality estimates of timothy pastures. Considering globally the three groups of parameters, the UAS strategy using the DJI Phantom 4 pro (Nadir view angle) provides the most satisfactory results. The UAS survey using the DJI Phantom 4 pro (Nadir view angle) provided R2 values of 0.48, 0.72, and 0.7, respectively, for individual sward height measurements, mean sward height, and sward biomass. In terms of forage quality modeling, this UAS survey strategy provides R² values ranging from 0.33 (Acid Detergent Lignin) to 0.85 (fodder units for dairy and beef cattle and fermentable organic matter). Even if their performances are of lower order than state-of-art techniques such as LiDAR for sward height or hyperspectral sensors (for biomass and forage quality modeling), the important trade-off in terms of costs between UAS LiDAR (>100,000 €) or hyperspectral sensors (>50,000 €) promotes the use of such low-cost UAS solutions. This is particularly true for sward height modeling and biomass monitoring, where our low-cost solutions provide more accurate results than state-of-the-art field approaches, such as rising plate meters, with a broader extent and a finer spatial grain.
Disciplines :
Agriculture & agronomy
Author, co-author :
Michez, Adrien  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Département de géographie
Lejeune, Philippe ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Gestion des ressources forestières et des milieux naturels
David, Knoden
Sébastien, Decremer
Christian, Decamps
Bindelle, Jérôme  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département GxABT > Ingénierie des productions animales et nutrition
Language :
English
Title :
Can Low-Cost Unmanned Aerial Systems Describe the Forage Quality Heterogeneity? Insight from a Timothy Pasture Case Study in Southern Belgium
Publication date :
2020
Journal title :
Remote Sensing
eISSN :
2072-4292
Publisher :
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Basel, Switzerland
Volume :
12
Issue :
10 1650
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 22 May 2020

Statistics


Number of views
78 (17 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
88 (8 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
18
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
14
OpenCitations
 
12

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi