Letter to the editor (Scientific journals)
Reply to Mr. Osmaston concerning the nature of the redshift
Helbig, Phillip
2014In The Observatory : a Review of Astronomy, 134 (1236), p. 76-76
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
cosmic_confusion_2.pdf
Author postprint (270.06 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
cosmology: theory; cosmology:history; cosmology:misconceptions
Abstract :
[en] This is my reply to a reply by Osmaston (The Observatory, 134, p 33, No 1238 (February 2014)) to my comment (The Observatory, 133, p 294, No 1236 (October 2013)) on a comment by Osmaston (from the report on the meeting) (The Observatory, 133, p 136, No 1234 (June 2013)) on a talk by Andrew Liddle (The Observatory, 133, p 135, No 1234 (June 2013)) at an RAS meeting.
Disciplines :
Space science, astronomy & astrophysics
Author, co-author :
Language :
English
Title :
Reply to Mr. Osmaston concerning the nature of the redshift
Publication date :
01 April 2014
Journal title :
The Observatory : a Review of Astronomy
ISSN :
0029-7704
Publisher :
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, United Kingdom
Volume :
134
Issue :
1236
Pages :
76-76
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Commentary :
This is a "correspondence" piece, not a regular article per se, i.e. a "letter to the editor" in the original sense of the term. They are refereed, though; I've received comments on my own such contributions, and refereed those of others.
Available on ORBi :
since 10 February 2020

Statistics


Number of views
35 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
3 (1 by ULiège)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi