Personality and safety citizenship: the role of safety motivation and safety knowledge

[en] Safety citizenship behaviors (SCB) have never been classified following the intended beneficiary of these be-haviors. Thefirst aim of this study was to examine Hofmann et al. (2003)'s SCB items in an attempt to identify twodimensions: SCB oriented towards individuals (SCB-I) and SCB oriented towards the organization (SCB-O).Further, by drawing on Christian et al. (2009)'s model of safety performance, we examined how distal (i.e.personality) and proximal (i.e. safety motivation and knowledge) person-related factors are associated with thesebehaviors. Structural equation modelling realized on a sample of 290 workers from a Belgian pharmaceuticalcompany showed that the broader conscientiousness trait was related to both SCB-I and SCB-O, indirectly throughsafety motivation and knowledge, as would be predicted by Christian et al. In contrast, the altruism facet wasdirectly related to SCB-I only. Results are discussed and practical implications considered.

Disciplines :

Social, industrial & organizational psychology

Author, co-author :

Laurent, Julie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Valorisation des ressources humaines

Chmiel, Nik; University of Chichester

Hansez, Isabelle ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Valorisation des ressources humaines

Language :

English

Title :

Personality and safety citizenship: the role of safety motivation and safety knowledge

Publication date :

January 2020

Journal title :

Heliyon

eISSN :

2405-8440

Publisher :

Elsevier, Netherlands

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 28 January 2020

Statistics

Number of views

136 (23 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

76 (13 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Ajzen, I., Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. 1988, Dorsey Press, Homewood, IL.
Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W., Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103:3 (1988), 411–423.
Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., Li, N., The theory of purposeful work behavior: the role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Acad. Manag. Rev. 38 (2013), 132–153.
Beus, J.M., Dhanani, L.Y., McCord, M.A., A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: addressing unanswered questions. J. Appl. Psychol. 100 (2015), 481–498.
Beus, J.M., McCord, M.A., Zohar, D., Workplace safety: a review and research synthesis. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 6:4 (2016), 352–381.
Borman, W.C., Motowidlo, S.J., Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Schmitt, N., Borman, W.C., (eds.) Personnel Selection in Organizations, 1993, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 71–98.
Campbell, J.P., McCloy, R.A., Oppler, S.H., Sager, C.E., A theory of performance. Schmitt, N., Borman, W.C., Associates, (eds.) Personnel Selection in Organizations, 1993, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 35–70.
Chen, C.-F., Personality, safety attitudes and risky driving behaviors—evidence from young Taiwanese motorcyclists. Accid. Anal. Prev. 41:5 (2009), 963–968.
Chmiel, N., Laurent, J., Hansez, I., Employee perspectives on safety citizenship behaviors and safety violations. Saf. Sci. 93 (2017), 96–107.
Christian, M.S., Bradley, J.C., Wallace, J.C., Burke, M.J., Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J. Appl. Psychol. 94 (2009), 1103–1127.
Clarke, S., Robertson, I., A meta-analytic review of the Big Five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 78 (2005), 355–376.
Clarke, S., Robertson, I., An examination of the role of personality in work accident using meta-analysis. Appl. Psychol.: Int. Rev. 57 (2008), 94–108.
Conchie, S.M., Transformational leadership, intrinsic motivation, and Trust: a moderated-mediated model of workplace safety. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 18:2 (2013), 198–201.
Conchie, S.M., Taylor, P.J., Donald, I.J., Promoting safety voice through safety-specific transformational leadership: the mediator role of two dimensions of trust. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 17 (2012), 105–115.
Curcuruto, M., Conchie, S.M., Mariano, M.G., Violante, F.S., The role of prosocial and proactive safety behaviors in predicting safety performance. Saf. Sci. 80 (2015), 317–323.
Curcuruto, M., Griffin, M.A., Prosocial and proactive “safety citizenship behavior” (SCB): the mediating role of affective commitment and psychological ownership. Saf. Sci. 104 (2018), 29–38.
Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11:4 (2000), 227–268.
Fehr, E., Gachter, S., Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity. J. Econ. Perspect. 14:3 (2000), 159–181.
Goldberg, L.R., A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Mervielde, I., Deary, I., De Fruyt, F., Ostendorf, F., (eds.) Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 1999, Tilburg University Press, Tilburg, The Netherlands, 7–28.
Griffin, M.A., Neal, A., Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge and motivation. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 5 (2000), 347–358.
Hofmann, D.A., Burke, M.J., Zohar, D., 100 years of occupational safety research: from basic protections and work analysis to a multilevel view of workplace safety and risk. J. Appl. Psychol. 102:3 (2017), 375–388.
Hofmann, D.A., Morgeson, F.P., Gerras, S.J., Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: safety climate as an exemplar. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:1 (2003), 170–178.
Hogan, J., Foster, J., Multifaceted personality predictors of workplace safety performance: more than conscientiousness. Hum. Perform. 26 (2013), 20–43.
Ilies, R., Fulmer, I.S., Spitzmuller, M., Johnson, M.D., Personality and citizenship behavior: the mediating role of job satisfaction. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:4 (2009), 945–959.
International Labor Organization. Safety and Health at Work: A Vision for Sustainable Prevention. 2014 http://www.ilo.org/safework/info/publications/WCMS_301214/lang--en/index.htm. (Accessed 15 January 2018)
Kline, R., Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. third ed., 2011, Guilford Press, New-York.
Little, T.D., Specifying and interpreting a longitudinal panel model. Little, T., Card, N., (eds.) Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling, 2013, Guilford, New York, NY.
Little, T.D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., Schoemann, A.M., Why the items versus parcels controversy need not be one. Psychol. Methods 18:3 (2013), 285–300.
Lothe, B., Bertrand, F., Hansez, I., Elaboration et validation de tests de jugement situationnel comme outil de sélection professionnelle : guide méthodologique. Psychol. Travail Organ. 18:3 (2012), 215–231.
McDaniel, M.A., Hartman, N.S., Whetzel, D.L., Grubb, W.L. III, Situational judgment tests, response instructions, and validity: a meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol. 60 (2007), 63–91.
Motowidlo, S.J., Borman, W.C., Schmit, M.J., A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Hum. Perform. 10:2 (1997), 71–83.
Neal, A., Griffin, M.A., A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:4 (2006), 946–953.
Organ, D.W., Organizational Citizenship Behavior: the Good Soldier Syndrome. 1988, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
Organ, D.W., Ryan, K., A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Pers. Psychol. 48 (1995), 775–802.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, N.P., Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:5 (2003), 879–903.
Preacher, K., Hayes, A., Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40:3 (2008), 879–891.
Stevens, J., Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. fourth ed., 2002, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J.
Tucker, S., Chmiel, N., Turner, N., Hershcovis, M.S., Stride, C.B., Perceived organizational support for safety and employee safety voice: the mediating role of coworker support for safety. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 13:4 (2008), 319–330.
Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L.L., McLean-Parks, J., Extra-role behaviors: in pursuit of construct and definitional clarity. Cummings, L.L., Staw, B.M., (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 1995, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 215–285.
Van Dyne, L., LePine, J., Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity. Acad. Manag. J. 41 (1998), 108–119.
Vroom, V.H., Work and Motivation. 1964, Wiley, Oxford, England.
Wachter, J.K., Yorio, P.L., A system of safety management practices and worker engagement for reducing and preventing accidents: an empirical and theoretical investigation. Accid. Anal. Prev. 68 (2014), 117–130.
Williams, L.J., Anderson, S.E., Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. J. Manag. 17 (1991), 601–617.
Wong, J.-T., Chung, Y.-S., Huang, S.-H., Determinants behind young motorcyclists’ risky riding behavior. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42:1 (2010), 275–281.