Vocal beauty: a mediating variable in the negative stereotyping of dysphonic speakers

[en] Context: A range of studies have consistently shown that listeners associate negative psychosocial characteristics to speakers with dysphonia. The reasons why have not formerly been explored. A better understanding of the mechanisms behind this negative stereotype could help to develop attitude- changing measures towards voice disorders. Aim: We want to explore if the negative psychosocial stereotype linked to dysphonia is due to dys- phonia’s negative impact on perceived vocal beauty. Methods: A group of naïve listeners was asked to listen to female voice samples with varying degrees of dysphonia according to the Grade (G) of the GRBAS scale, and then to rate the perceived degree of vocal beauty for each voice on a visual analogue scale. They were also asked to infer personal charac- teristics of each speaker on a set of 21 Bipolar semantic scales. Results: Mediation analyses showed that G significantly and negatively predicts perceptions of vocal beauty (p < .001) and that vocal beauty in its turn was significantly and positively predicting inferences of negative psychosocial characteristics in the speakers (p<.001). When vocal beauty was partialled out, the negative impact of G was diminished or even cancelled. Conclusion: Our results show that in female speakers, the negative impact of dysphonia on the attri- bution of speakers’ personal characteristic is explained by the negative impact of dysphonia on per- ceived vocal beauty. Our results support the hypothesis that the beauty stereotype underlies the negative biases existing towards dysphonic speakers. We suggest that clinicians should be aware of this mechanism when promoting awareness about dysphonia.

Disciplines :

Otolaryngology

Author, co-author :

Verduyckt, Ingrid; University of Montreal > School of speech language pathology and audiology > Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal

Morsomme, Dominique ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Logopédie > Logopédie des troubles de la voix

Language :

English

Title :

Vocal beauty: a mediating variable in the negative stereotyping of dysphonic speakers

Publication date :

2020

Journal title :

Logopedics, Phoniatrics, Vocology

ISSN :

1401-5439

eISSN :

1651-2022

Publisher :

Taylor & Francis, United Kingdom

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

164–171

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 03 December 2019

Statistics

Number of views

67 (11 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

2 (2 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Lass NJ, Ruscello DM, Bradshaw KH, et al. Adolescents' perceptions of normal and voice-disordered children. J Commun Disord. 1991;24(4):267–274.
Lass NJ, Ruscello DM, Harkins KE, et al. A comparative study of adolescents' perceptions of normal-speaking and dysarthric children. J Commun Disord. 1993;26(1):3–12.
Lass NJ, Ruscello DM, Lakawicz JA. Listeners' perceptions of nonspeech characteristics of normal and dysarthric children. J Commun Disord. 1988;21(5):385–391.
Ruscello DM, Lass NJ, Podbesek J. Listeners’ perceptions of normal and voice-disordered children. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1988;40(6):290–296.
Ma EP-M, Yu CH-Y. Listeners' attitudes toward children with voice problems. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56(5):1409–1415.
Zacharias SR, Kelchner LN, Creaghead N. Teachers' perceptions of adolescent females with voice disorders. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2013;44(2):174–182.
Blood GW, Mahan BW, Hyman M. Judging personality and appearance from voice disorders. J Commun Disord. 1979;12(1):63–67.
Allard ER, Williams DF. Listeners’ perceptions of speech and language disorders. J Commun Disord. 2008;41(2):108–123.
Amir O, Levine-Yundof R. Listeners' attitude toward people with dysphonia. J Voice. 2013;27(4):524.e1–e1-524. e10.
Lallh AK, Rochet AP. The effect of information on listeners' attitudes toward speakers with voice or resonance disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43(3):782–795.
Eadie TL, Rajabzadeh R, Isetti DD, et al. The effect of information and severity on perception of speakers with adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;26(2):327–341.
Pickens J. Attitudes and perceptions. Miami (FL): Organizational Behavior in Health Care; 2005. p. 43–76.
Maryn Y, Debo K. Is perceived dysphonia related to perceived healthiness? Logop Phoniatr Voco. 2015;40(3):122–128.
Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E. What is beautiful is good. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972;24(3):285.
Dion KK, Pak AW-P, Dion KL. Stereotyping physical attractiveness: a sociocultural perspective. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 1990;21(2):158–179.
Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, et al. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull. 2000;126(3):390.
Hughes SM, Miller NE. What sounds beautiful looks beautiful stereotype: the matching of attractiveness of voices and faces. J Soc Pers Relat. 2016;33(7):984–996.
Zuckerman M, Driver RE. What sounds beautiful is good: The vocal attractiveness stereotype. J Nonverbal Behav. 1988;13(2):67–82.
Zuckerman M, Miyake K, Elkin CS. Effects of attractiveness and maturity of face and voice on interpersonal impressions. J Res Pers. 1995;29(2):253–272.
DeGroot T, Aime F, Johnson SG, et al. Does talking the talk help walking the walk? An examination of the effect of vocal attractiveness in leader effectiveness. Leadership Quart. 2011;22(4):680–689.
Barkat-Defradas M, Busseuil C, Chauvy O, et al. Dimension esthétique des voix normales et dysphoniques: approches perceptive et acoustique. Tipa. 2012;(28). DOI:10.4000/tipa.204
Combescure P. Phrases phonétiquement équilibrées. CNET Lannion, Recherches Acoustiques. 1980;6:45–62.
Hirano M. Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice: GRBAS scale for evaluating the hoarse voice. In Clinical Evaluation of Voice. Wien (Austria): Springer Verlag; 1981.
Kacha A, Grenez F, Schoentgen J. Voice quality assessment by means of comparative judgments of speech Tokens. Lisbon, Portugal: Interspeech; 2005.
Altenberg EP, Ferrand CT. Perception of individuals with Voice Disorders by Monolingual English, Bilingual Cantonese–English, and Bilingual Russian–English Women. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006;49(4):879–887.
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182.
Van Dongen HP, Olofsen E, Dinges DF, et al. Mixed-model regression analysis and dealing with interindividual differences. in Methods in enzymology. Vol. 384. 2004. Academic Press. p. 139–171.
Osgood CE, Suci GJ, and PH., Tannenbaum The measurement of meaning. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press; 1957.
DiStefano C, Zhu M, Mindrila D. Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Res Evaluation. 2009;14(20):1–11.
Kreiman J, Gerratt BR. Perceptual assessment of voice quality past, present, and future. Perspect Voice Voice Dis. 2010;20(2):62–67.
Bruckert L, Bestelmeyer P, Latinus M, et al. Vocal attractiveness increases by averaging. Curr Biol. 2010;20(2):116–120.
Senior C. Beauty in the brain of the beholder. Neuron. 2003;38(4):525–528.
Bray S, O'Doherty J. Neural coding of reward-prediction error signals during classical conditioning with attractive faces. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97(4):3036–3045.
O'Doherty J, et al. Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia. 2003;41:147–155.
Kawabata H, Zeki S. Neural correlates of beauty. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91(4):1699–1705.
Bestelmeyer PEG, Latinus M, Bruckert L, et al. Implicitly perceived vocal attractiveness modulates prefrontal cortex activity. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22(6):1263–1270.
Ruscello D, Lass N. Attitudes toward dysarthria: examination of an educational training program. Seattle (WA): In Meeting of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 1996.
Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Precoda K, et al. Individual differences in voice quality perception. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1992;35(3):512–520.