[en] This paper consists of an analysis of the concept of empowerment—which is often defined
as a key issue in health care—at the macro, meso, and micro levels by focusing on health care reform
in Belgium. Three research teams collected data and combined them in an inductive secondary
analysis. Our preliminary results demonstrate that patient empowerment does not always encompass
the same scientific reality. At the macro level, this concept is linked to the authorities’ wish to support
at-home care for chronic patients. At the meso level, the role of caregivers in maintaining patients’
autonomy, but also the social conditions of their lives, is a salient component of empowerment. At
the micro level, individual and personal features such as identity can influence patient empowerment
and behavior in the health care system. This cross-level research suggests that patient empowerment
is not sufficiently clearly defined at each level of the care production chain, which could impede the
reform of health care. This paper underlines the polysemy of a concept viewed as a milestone in
European health care policy and the necessity of a clear, collective definition to operationalize and
implement it.
Disciplines :
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Tilkin, Caroline ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Psychologie de la santé
De Winter, Mélanie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Faculté des sciences sociales > Sociologie des ress. hum. et des systèmes institutionnels
European Union Policy Forum. Answer to DG SANCO Consultation on Chronic Diseases. 2012. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/health//sites/health/files/interest_groups/docs/euhpf_answer_ consultation_jan2012_en.pdf (accessed on 13 June 2019).
Paulus, D.; Van den Heede, K.; Mertens, R. Organisation des Soins Pour les Malades Chroniques en Belgique: Développement d’un Position Paper; Centre d’Expertise des Soins de Santé (KCE): Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
Ording, A.; Sørensen, H. Concepts of comorbidities, multiple morbidities, complications, and their clinical epidemiologic analogs. Clin. Epidemiol. 2013, 5, 199–203. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schokkart, E.; Van de Voorde, C. Belgium’s Healthcare System. Should the Communities/Regions Take It Over? or the Sickness Funds? Available online: http://www.rethinkingbelgium.eu/rebel-initiativeebooks/ebook-10-belgium-healthcare-system-communities-regions-take-over-sickness-funds (accessed on 13 June 2019).
Belgian Ministry of Social Affairs and Public Health. Plan Conjoint en Faveur des Malades Chroniques: Des Soins Intégrés Pour une Meilleure Santé. 2015. Available online: http://www.integreo.be/sites/default/files/public/content/plan_fr.pdf (accessed on 13 June 2019).
WHO. Integrated Health Services—What and Why? Technical Brief No. 1. 2008. Available online: http://www.who.int/healthsystems/technical_brief_final.pdf (accessed on 13 June 2019).
Aujoulat, I.; d’Hoore, W.; Deccache, A. Patient empowerment in theory and practice: Polysemy or cacophony? Patient Educ. Couns. 2007, 56, 13–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Calvès, A.E. “Empowerment”: Généalogie d’un concept clé du discours contemporain. Rev. Tiers Monde 2009, 200, 735–749. [CrossRef]
WHO. Regional Office for Europe, Health Promotion. 1986. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/__ data/assets/pdf_file/0004/129532/Ottawa_Charter.pdf (accessed on 13 June 2019).
Funnell, M.M. Patient empowerment: What does it really mean? Patient Educ. Couns. 2016, 99, 1921–1922. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rappaport, J. Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. Am. J. Community Psychol. 1987, 15, 121–145. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Granovetter, M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 1985, 91, 481–510. [CrossRef]
Tilkin, C.; Dewinter, M.; Ketterer, F.; Etienne, A.M.; Vanmeerbeek, M.; Schoenaers, F. Considering patients’ empowerment in chronic care management: A multidisciplinary approach. Int. J. Integr. Care 2018, 18. [CrossRef]
Ketterer, F.; Vanmeerbeek, M. Cross Analysis of Patients’, Professionals’ and Informal Caregivers’ Experience of Multiple Chronic Conditions (Unpublished Report); University of Liege: Liege, Belgium, 2017.
Pomey, M.P.; Flora, L.; Karazivan, P.; Dumez, V.; Lebel, P.; Vanier, M.C.; Débarges, D.; Clavel, N.; Jouet, E. Le “Montréal Model”: Enjeux du partenariat relationnel entre patients et professionnels de la santé. Sante Publique 2015, 1, 41–50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Castro, E.M.; Van Regenmortel, T.; Vanhaecht, K.; Sermeus, W.; Van Hecke, A. Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept analysis based on a literature review. Patient Educ. Couns. 2016, 99, 1923–1939. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sardenberg, C. Liberal vs. liberating empowerment: A Latin American feminist perspective on conceptualizing women’s empowerment. IDS Bull. 2018, 39, 18–25. [CrossRef]
Bacqué, M.H.; Biewener, C. L’empowerment, une Pratique Émancipatrice; La Découverte: Paris, France, 2015.
Aujoulat, I. L’empowerment des Patients Atteints de Maladie Chronique. Des Processus Multiples: Autodétermination, Auto-Efficacité, Sécurité et Cohérence Identitaire. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain, Belgium, 2007.
Oxaal, Z.; Baden, S. Gender and Empowerment: Definition, Approaches and Implications for Policy, Bridge Development—Gender, Report No. 40; Institute of Development Studies: Brighton, UK, 1997.
Bebbington, A.; Lewis, D.; Batterbury, S.; Olson, E.; Siddiqi, M. Of texts and practices: Empowerment and organizational cultures in World Bank-funded rural development programmes. J. Dev. Stud. 2007, 43, 597–621. [CrossRef]