Housing the multitude: struggling with impermanence and singularities

This article seeks to trace a history of Team X's experimentations on the issue of
housing for the great number and more specifically around the theoretical background
leading to the question of impermanence and indeterminacy in the architectural
process. Through the writings of the Smithsons, Oskar Hansen, or John Voelcker, a
theoretical framework will be defined and then put into perspective in a contemporary
context. Two case studies will be discussed: Lacaton and Vassal and Elemental.
Connections will be made on the issue of indeterminacy and the concepts of “open
structure” and “open aesthetics" will be promoted. These concepts presented here
offer an alternative for some other possible formal developments around the question
of indeterminacy. We will assess whether the pragmatism of these two contemporary
architectural offices allow their proposals, beyond responding to specific situations, to
claim the status of a reproducible model, such as one imagined during the 1960s.