multi-area power system; centralized control; multi-party optimization; multi-objective optimization; fairness
Abstract :
[en] This paper addresses the problem of centralized optimization of an interconnected power system partitioned into several regions controlled by different transmission system operators (TSOs). It is assumed that those utilities have agreed to transferring some of their competencies to a centralized control center, which is in charge of setting the control variables in the entire system to satisfy every utility’s individual objective. This paper proposes an objective method for centralized optimization of such multi-TSO power systems, which relies on the assumption that each TSO has a real-valued optimization function focusing on its control area only. This method is illustrated on the IEEE 118 bus system partitioned into three TSOs. It is applied to the optimal reactive power dispatch problem, where the control variables are the voltage settings for generators and compensators. After showing that the method has some properties of fairness, namely freedom from envy, efficiency, accountability, and altruism, we emphasize its robustness with respect to certain biased behavior of the different TSOs.
Disciplines :
Electrical & electronics engineering
Author, co-author :
Phulpin, Yannick
Begovic, Miroslav
Petit, Marc
Ernst, Damien ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Dép. d'électric., électron. et informat. (Inst.Montefiore) > Systèmes et modélisation
Language :
English
Title :
A fair method for centralized optimization of multi-TSO power systems
Publication date :
2009
Journal title :
International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Bialek J.W. Are blackouts contagious. IEE Power Eng 17 6 (2003) 10-13
Final report - system disturbance on 4 November 2006. In: UCTE; January 2007.
Day L.R. Control area trends: principles and responses. IEEE Comp Appl Power 8 2 (1995) 34-39
Fardanesh B. Future trends in power system control. IEEE Comp Appl Power 15 3 (2002) 24-31
Conejo A.J., and Aguado J.A. Multi-area coordinated decentralized DC optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13 4 (1998) 1272-1278
Phulpin Y, Begovic M, Petit M, Heyberger JB, Ernst D. Evaluation of network equivalents for voltage optimization in multi-area power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst; in press.
Aguado J.A., and Quintana V.H. Inter-utilities power-exchange coordination: a market-oriented approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16 3 (2001) 513-519
Rebours Y., Kirschen D., Trotignon M., and Rossignol S. A survey of frequency and voltage control ancillary services - part I: technical features. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22 1 (2007) 350-357
Dubins L.E., and Spanier E.H. How to cut a cake fairly?. Amer Math Monthly 68 1 (1961) 1-17
Rubenstein-Montano B., and Malaga R. A weighted-sum genetic algorithm to support multiple-party multiple-objective negotiations. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6 (2002) 366-377
Gembicki F.W., and Haimes Y.Y. Approach to performance and sensitivity multiobjective optimization: the goal attainment method. IEEE Trans Automat Control 20 6 (1975) 769-771
Chen Y.L., and Liu C.C. Multiobjective VAR planning using the goal-attainment method. IEEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 141 3 (1994) 227-232
Hsiao Y.T., Chiang H.D., Liu C.C., and Chen Y.L. A computer package for optimal multi-objective VAR planning in large-scale power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 9 2 (1994) 668-676
Zionts S., and Wallenius J. An interactive programming method for solving the multiple-criteria problem. Manage Sci 22 6 (1976) 652-663
Lim LH, Benbasat I. From negotiation to negotiation support systems: a theoretical perspective. In: Proceedings of the HICSS 1992; January 1992. p. 153-63.
Miguelez E., Echavarren Cerezo F., and Rodriguez L. On the assignment of voltage control ancillary service of generators in spain. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22 1 (2007) 367-375
Janssens N. Tertiary and secondary voltage control for the Belgian HV system. In: Proceedings of the IEE colloquium on international practices in reactive power control; April 1993. p. 81-4.
Deeb N., and Shahidehpour S.M. Linear reactive power optimization in a large power network using the decomposition approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 5 2 (1990) 428-438
Venkatesh B., Sadasivam G., and Khan M.A. A new optimal reactive power scheduling method for loss minimization and voltage stability margin maximization using successive multi-objective fuzzy LP technique. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15 2 (2000) 844-851
Wu H., Yu C.W., Xu N., and Lin X.J. An OPF based approach for assessing the minimal reactive power support for generators in deregulated power systems. Int J Elect Power Energy Syst 30 1 (2008) 23-30
He R., Taylor G.A., and Song Y.H. Multi-objective optimal reactive power flow including voltage security and demand profile classification. Int J Elect Power Energy Syst 30 5 (2008) 327-336
Das I., and Dennis J.E. Normal-boundary intersection: a new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM J Optim 8 3 (1998) 631-657
Quintana V.H., Torres G.L., and Medina-Palomo J. Interior-point methods and their applications to power systems: a classification of publications and software codes. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15 1 (2000) 170-176
Orfanogianni T, Bacher R. Increased OPF code development efficiency by integration of general purpose optimization and derivative computation tools. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE international conference on power industry computer applications, PICA'99; May 1999. p. 123-9.
Capitanescu F., Glavic M., Ernst D., Wehenkel L., and Interior-point based algorithms for the solution of optimal power flow p. Electric Power Syst Res 77 5-6 (2007) 508-517
Dickinson D.L., and Tiefenthaler J. What is fair? Experimental evidence. South Econ J 69 2 (2002) 414-428
Feldman A., and Kirman A. Fairness and envy. Amer Econ Rev 64 (1974) 995-1005
Konow J. A positive theory of economic fairness. J Behav Organization 31 (1996) 13-35
Phulpin Y, Begovic M, Petit M, Ernst D. On the fairness of centralised decision-making strategies in multi-TSO power systems. In: Proceedings of the PSCC 2008; July 2008. p. 1-8.
Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer Econ Rev 83 (1993) 1281-1302
Wang H., Murillo-Sanchez C.E., Zimmerman R.D., and Thomas R.J. On computational issues of market-based optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22 3 (2007) 1185-1193
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
