Rodríguez, A.; CEIGRAM, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Department of Economic Analysis and Finances, Toledo, 45071, Spain
Ruiz-Ramos, M.; CEIGRAM, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain
Palosuo, T.; Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, 00790, Finland
Carter, T. R.; Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, 00251, Finland
Fronzek, S.; Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, 00251, Finland
Lorite, I. J.; IFAPA Junta de Andalucía, Córdoba, 14004, Spain
Ferrise, R.; University of Florence, Florence, 50144, Italy
Pirttioja, N.; Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, 00251, Finland
Bindi, M.; University of Florence, Florence, 50144, Italy
Baranowski, P.; Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4, Lublin, 20-290, Poland
Buis, S.; INRA, UMR 1114 EMMAH, Avignon, F-84914, France
Cammarano, D.; James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, Scotland DD2 5DA, United Kingdom
Chen, Yu
Dumont, Benjamin ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Agronomie, Bio-ingénierie et Chimie (AgroBioChem) > Ingénierie des productions végétales et valorisation
Ewert, F.; INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, 53115, Germany
Gaiser, T.; INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, 53115, Germany
Hlavinka, P.; Institute of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, 603 00, Czech Republic
Hoffmann, H.; INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, 53115, Germany
Höhn, J. G.; Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, 00790, Finland
Jurecka, F.; Institute of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, 603 00, Czech Republic
Kersebaum, K. C.; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, 15374, Germany
Krzyszczak, J.; Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4, Lublin, 20-290, Poland
Lana, M.; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, 15374, Germany, Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Ulls väg 16, Uppsala, 75007, Sweden
Mechiche-Alami, A.; Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, 223 62, Sweden
Minet, Julien ; Université de Liège - ULiège > DER Sc. et gest. de l'environnement (Arlon Campus Environ.) > DER Sc. et gest. de l'environnement (Arlon Campus Environ.)
Montesino, M.; University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, 2630, Denmark
Nendel, C.; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, 15374, Germany
Porter, J. R.; University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, 2630, Denmark
Ruget, F.; INRA, UMR 1114 EMMAH, Avignon, F-84914, France
Semenov, M. A.; Rothamsted Research, Herts, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom
Tao, F.; Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, 00790, Finland
Trnka, M.; Institute of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, 613 00, Czech Republic, Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, 603 00, Czech Republic
de Wit, A.; Wageningen University, Wageningen, 6700AA, Netherlands
Rötter, R. P.; TROPAGS, Department of Crop Sciences, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Grisebachstr. 6, Göttingen, 37077, Germany, Centre for Biodiversity and Land Use (CBL), Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Büsgenweg 1, Göttingen, 37077, Germany
Abeledo, L.G., Savin, R., Slafer, G.A., Wheat productivity in the Mediterranean Ebro Valley: analyzing the gap between attainable and potential yield with a simulation model. Eur. J. Agron. 28:4 (2008), 541–550.
Asseng, S., et al. Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5:2 (2015), 143–147.
Bassu, S., et al. How do various maize crop models vary in their responses to climate change factors? Glob. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy 20:7 (2014), 2301–2320.
Cartelle, J., Pedro, A., Savin, R., Slafer, G.A., Grain weight responses to post-anthesis spikelet-trimming in an old and a modern wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Eur. J. Agron. 25:4 (2006), 365–371.
Challinor, A.J., et al. A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4:4 (2014), 287–291.
Confalonieri, R., et al. Uncertainty in crop model predictions: what is the role of users?. Environ. Environ. Model. Softw. 81 (2016), 165–173.
Fronzek, S., Carter, T.R., Raisanen, J., Ruokolainen, L., Luoto, M., Applying probabilistic projections of climate change with impact models: a case study for sub-arctic palsa mires in Fennoscandia. Clim. Change 99:3-4 (2010), 515–534.
Fronzek, S., et al. Classifying multi-model wheat yield impact response surfaces showing sensitivity to temperature and precipitation change. Agric. Syst. 159 (2018), 209–224.
Harris, G.R., Collins, M., Sexton, D.M.H., Murphy, J.M., Booth, B.B.B., Probabilistic projections for 21st century European climate. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 10:9 (2010), 2009–2020.
Iizumi, T., Tanaka, Y., Sakurai, G., Ishigooka, Y., Yokozawa, M., Dependency of parameter values of a crop model on the spatial scale of simulation. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 6 (2014), 527–540.
Iocola, I., et al. Can conservation tillage mitigate climate change impacts in Mediterranean cereal systems? A soil organic carbon assessment using long term experiments. Eur. J. Agron. 90 (2017), 96–107.
IPCC, Special report on emissions scenarios. Nakićenović, N., Swart, R., (eds.) A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 570.
IPCC, Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Pachauri, R.K., Meyer, L.A., (eds.) Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 Core Writing Team.
Jamieson, P.D., Porter, J.R., Wilson, D.R., A test of the computer-simulation model ARCHWHEAT1 on wheat crops grown in New-Zealand. Field Crop. Res. 27:4 (1991), 337–350.
Katzav, J., Dijkstra, H.A., de Laat, A.T.J.J., Assessing climate model projections: state of the art and philosophical reflections. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. B 43:4 (2012), 258–276.
Knutti, R., The end of model democracy?. Clim. Change 102:3 (2010), 395–404.
Kovats, R.S., et al. Europe. Barros, V.R., Field, C.B., Dokken, D.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Mach, K.J., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., Girma, B., Kissel, E.S., Levy, A.N., MacCracken, S., Mastrandrea, P.R., White, L.L., (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 1267–1326.
Li, T., et al. Uncertainties in predicting rice yield by current crop models under a wide range of climatic conditions. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy 21:3 (2015), 1328–1341.
Lobell, D.B., Climate change adaptation in crop production: beware of illusions. Glob. Food Sec. 3:2 (2014), 72–76.
Maiorano, A., et al. Crop model improvement reduces the uncertainty of the response to temperature of multi-model ensembles. Field Crop. Res. 202 (2017), 5–20.
Martre, P., et al. Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy 21:2 (2015), 911–925.
Mastrandrea, M.D., et al. Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties. Available at, 2010, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) http://www.ipcc.ch.
Metzger, M.J., Bunce, R.G.H., Jongman, R.H.G., Mücher, C.A., Watkins, J.W., A climatic stratification of the environment of Europe. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 14:6 (2005), 549–563.
Moriondo, M., et al. Impact and adaptation opportunities for European agriculture in response to climatic change and variability. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 15:7 (2010), 657–679.
Palosuo, T., et al. Simulation of winter wheat yield and its variability in different climates of Europe: a comparison of eight crop growth models. Eur. J. Agron. 35:3 (2011), 103–114.
Pirttioja, N., et al. Temperature and precipitation effects on wheat yield across a European transect: a crop model ensemble analysis using impact response surfaces. Clim. Chang. Res. Lett. 65 (2015), 87–105.
Rosenzweig, C., et al. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111:9 (2014), 3268–3273.
Rötter, R.P., Carter, T.R., Olesen, J.E., Porter, J.R., Crop-climate models need an overhaul. Nat. Clim. Chang. 1:4 (2011), 175–177.
Rötter, R.P., et al. Simulation of spring barley yield in different climatic zones of Northern and Central Europe: a comparison of nine crop models. Field Crop. Res. 133 (2012), 23–36.
Rötter, R.P., Tao, F., Höhn, J.G., Palosuo, T., Use of crop simulation modelling to aid ideotype design of future cereal cultivars. J. Exp. Bot. 66:12 (2015), 3463–3476.
Ruiz-Ramos, M., Minguez, M.I., Evaluating uncertainty in climate change impacts on crop productivity in the Iberian Peninsula. Clim. Chang. Res. Lett. 44:1 (2010), 69–82.
Ruiz-Ramos, M., et al. Adaptation response surfaces for managing wheat under perturbed climate and CO2 in a Mediterranean environment. Agric. Syst. 159 (2018), 260–274.
Tao, F., et al. Designing future barley ideotypes using a crop model ensemble. Eur. J. Agron. 82 (2017), 144–162 Part A.
Tebaldi, C., Knutti, R., The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Philos. Trans. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365:1857 (2007), 2053–2075.
Wallach, D., Makowski, D., Jones, J.W., Brun, F., Working with Dynamic Crop Models: Methods, Tools and Examples for Agriculture and Environment: Second Edition. 2014, 1–487.
Wallach, D., Mearns, L.O., Ruane, A.C., Rötter, R.P., Asseng, S., Lessons from climate modeling on the design and use of ensembles for crop modeling. Clim. Change 139:3 (2016), 551–564.
Wallach, D., et al. Multimodel ensembles improve predictions of crop–environment–management interactions. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy, 2018 (in press).
Yin, X., et al. Multi-model uncertainty analysis in predicting grain N for crop rotations in Europe. Eur. J. Agron. 84 (2017), 152–165.