Towards a strategic research agenda for social sciences and humanities in radiological protection

[en] Reflecting a change in funding strategies for European research projects, and a commitment to the idea of responsible research and innovation in radiological protection (RP), a collective of research institutes and universities have developed a prospective Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) for Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in radiological protection. This is the first time such a research agenda has been proposed. This paper identifies six research lines of interest and concern: 1) Effects of social, psychological and economic aspects on RP behaviour; 2) Holistic approaches to the governance of radiological risks; 3) Responsible research and innovation in RP; 4) Stakeholder engagement and participatory processes in RP research, development, policy and practice; 5) Risk communication; and 6) RP cultures. These topics were developed through broad stakeholder consultation, in conjunction with activities carried out in the framework of various projects and initiatives (EU H2020 CONCERT programme, the EU FP7 projects OPERRA, PREPARE and EAGLE, the 2015-2018 RICOMET series of conferences, and the 2014 and 2016 International Symposia on Ethics of Environmental Health); as well as through dialogues with members of the European radiation protection research communities. The six research lines open opportunities to integrate a range of key social and ethical considerations into RP, thereby expanding research opportunities and programmes and fostering collaborative approaches to research and innovation.

Disciplines :

Sociology & social sciences

Author, co-author :

Perko, Tanja

Van Oudheusden, Michiel ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de science politique > Département de science politique

Turcanu, Catrinel

Pölzl-Viol, Christiane

Oughton, Deborah

Schieber, Caroline

Schneider, Thierry

Zölzer, Friedo

Mays, Claire

Martell, Merixtell

More authors (8 more)

Language :

English

Title :

Towards a strategic research agenda for social sciences and humanities in radiological protection

Publication date :

13 March 2019

Journal title :

Journal of Radiological Protection

ISSN :

0952-4746

eISSN :

1361-6498

Publisher :

IOP

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6498/ab0f89/meta

European Projects :

H2020 - 662287 - CONCERT - European Joint Programme for the Integration of Radiation Protection Research

Funders :

CEEA - Euratom - Communauté européenne de l'énergie atomique
CE - Commission Européenne

Available on ORBi :

since 26 March 2019

Statistics

Number of views

106 (1 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

88 (0 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Becker S M 2004 Emergency communication and information issues in terrorist events involving radioactive materials Biosecurity and Bioterrorism-Biodefense Strategy Practice and Science 2 195-207
Bergmans A, Sundqvist G, Kos D and Simmons P 2014 The participatory turn in radioactive waste management: deliberation and the social-technical divide Journal of Risk Research 18 347-63
Bréchignac F et al 2016 Addressing ecological effects of radiation on populations and ecosystems to improve protection of the environment against radiation: agreed statements from a Consensus Symposium J. Environ. Radioact. 158-159 21-9
Dubreuil G, Baudé S and Mays C 2013 Deciding for the future. Application of the aarhus convention in RWM IPPA Deliverable 3.8 (Szentendre, Hungary: Regional Environmental Center)
EC 2018 Science with and for society; work programme 2018-2020, H2020 European Commission Decision C(2018)4708 of 24 July 2018 (Brussels, Belgium: European Commission)
Felt U and Wynne B 2007 Taking European knowledge society seriously Report (Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research Science, Economy and Society) (https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/european-knowledge-society_en.pdf) (Accessed: 17 December 2018)
Friedrich-Nel H and Munro L 2015 Radiographers' opinion on patients' rights to informed consent: results of an online survey South African Radiographer 53 27-32
Hevey D 2017 Radon risk and remediation: a psychological perspective Frontiers in Public Health 5
ICRP 2018 Ethical Foundations of the System of Radiological Protection (Ottawa, Canada: ICRP) ICRP Publication 138
Impens N et al 2017 First joint roadmap, draft In European Joint Programme for the Integration of Radiation Protection Research (Brussels, Belgium: CONCERT)
Jenkins-Smith H C, Silva C L, Nowlin M C and Delozier G 2011 Reversing nuclear opposition: evolving public acceptance of a permanent nuclear waste disposal facility Risk Anal. 31 629-44
Lazo T, Lorenz P, Francois N, Prezelj I, Perko T, Andersson S, Jourdain J R and Jung T 2016 Public Declaration after the RICOMET 2016 Conf. Mol (Belgium,) (http://ricomet2016.sckcen.be/en/News/20160907_RICOMET_public_declaration)
Liland A and Raskob W 2016 Towards a self-sustaining European platform on nuclear and radiological emergency preparedness, response and recovery. Key results of the NERIS-TP European project Radioprotection 51 S1-3
Lofstedt R 2018 The communication of radon risk in Sweden: where are we and where are we going? Journal of Risk Research 1-9
Malesic M, Prezelj I, Juvan J, Polic M and Uhan M 2015 Evacuation in the event of a nuclear disaster: planned activity or improvisation? Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 12 102-11
Meskens G 2016 The science, politics and ethics of nuclear technology assessment Building a Platform for Enhanced Societal Research Related to Nuclear Energy in Central and Eastern Europe (Brussels, Belgium: PLATENSO)
OECD-NEA, CRPPH 2003 Stakeholder Participation in Radiological Decision Making: Processes and Implications. Case Studies for the Third Villigen Workshop
OECD/NEA 2011 Practices and Experience in Stakeholder Involvement for Post-nuclear Emergency Management (Paris, France: OECD)
Owen R, Macnaghten P and Stilgoe J 2012 Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society Science and Public Policy 39 751-60
Perko T, Zeleznik N, Turcanu C and Thijssen P 2012 Is knowledge important? Emperical research on nuclear risk communication in two countries Health Phys. 102 614-25
Perko T 2014 Radiation risk perception: a discrepancy between the experts and the general population J. Environ. Radioact. 133 86-91
Perko T, Turcanu C and Sirkka L 2015a Priorities for radiation protection research: Analysis of the Operra stakeholder survey In OPERRA, Open Project for European Radiation Research Area (Brussels, Belgium: European Commission)
Perko T, Tomkiv Y, Oughton D H, Cantone M C, Gallego E, Prezelj I and Byrkina E M 2015b Units related to radiation exposure and radioactivity in mass media: the Fukushima case study in Europe and Russia Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 164 154-9
Perko T et al 2016a Joint research needs and priorities addressing radiation protection research relevant for Social Sciences and Humanities European Joint Programme for the Integration of Radiation Protection Research (Brussels, Belgium: CONCERT)
Perko T, Zeleznik N, Mays C, Diaconu D, Kralj M and Koron B 2016b Communication recommendation related to Ionising Radiation EAGLE, Enhancing Education, Training and Communication Processes for Informed Behaviors and Decision-making Related to Ionizing Radiation Risks (Brussels; Belgium: EC)
Perko T, Raskob W and Jourdain J R 2016c Improved communication, understanding of risk perception and ethics related to ionising radiation J. Radiol. Prot. 36 15-22
Perko T, Monken-Fernandes H, Martell M, Zeleznik N and O'Sullivan P 2017a Societal constraints related to environmental remediation and decommissioning programmes J. Environ. Radioact. 196 171-80
Perko T et al 2017b Joint research needs and priorities addressing radiation protection research relevant for Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) European Joint Programme for the Integration of Radiation Protection Research H2020-662287
Prezelj I, Perko T, Cantone M C, Gallego E, Tomkiv Y and Oughton D H 2016 The limits of public communication coordination in a nuclear emergency: lessons from media reporting on the Fukushima case J. Radiol. Prot. 36 45-63
Renn O 2008 Risk governance; coping with uncertainty in a complex world Earthscan Risk in Society Series. ed R E Lofstedt (London: Earthscan)
Salomaa S et al 2017 Joint research needs and priorities addressing radiation protection research relevant for medical use of radiation and communication/risk perception in radiation protection field, D2.10. European Joint Programme for the Integration of Radiation Protection Research ed S Salomaa (Brussels, Belgium: H2020, CONCERT)
Schneider T et al 2016 NERIS: European platform on preparedness for nuclear and radiological emergency response and recovery - mdash;activities and perspectives Radioprotection 51 S5-8
Schneider T, Gering F, Charron S, Zhelezniak M, Andronopoulos S, Heriard-Dubreuil G, Camps J and Raskob W 2017 Nuclear and radiological preparedness: the achievements of the European research project PREPARE Radiat Prot Dosimetry 173 151-6
Schröder J, Bergmans A and Laes E 2015 Advanced research, lagging policy. Nuclear waste governance in Belgium Nuclear Waste Governance. An International Comparison ed A Brunnengräber et al (Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer) pp 141-56
Sjoberg L 2004 Local acceptance of a high-level nuclear waste repository Risk Anal. 24 737-49
Slovic P, Flynn J, Mertz C K, Poumadère M and Mays C 2000 Nuclear power and the public: a comparative study of risk perception in France and the United States Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: A Survey of Empirical Studies ed O Renn and B Rohrmann (Amsterdam, Nederland: Kluwer Academic Press)
Slovic P 2012 The perception gap: radiation and risk Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 68 67-75
Stirling A 2008a 'Opening up' and 'closing down': power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology Science, Technology and Human Values 33 262-94
Stirling A 2008b 'Opening up' and 'closing down': power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 262-94
Turcanu C and Perko T 2014 Report on public views across EU on education and information in the post-Fukushima context (Belgium) Report EAGLE, D3.1-Belgium. FP7 project EAGLE, Grant agreement no: 604521 (Brussels, Belgium: Belgian Nuclear Research Institute, SCK CEN) (http://eagle.sckcen.be/en/Deliverables)
UNECE 2013 Report of the Task Force on Public Participation in Decision-making on its fourth meeting ReportECE /MP.PP/WG.1/2013/6. (https://unece.org/index.php?id=31691) (Accessed: 10 December 2018)
Vanhavere F 2018 Third annual joint priority list European Joint Programme for the Integration of Radiation Protection Research Report H2020-662287. D 3.3
Van Oudheusden M, Turcanu C and Molyneux-Hodgson S 2018 Absent, yet present? Moving with 'responsible research and innovation' in radiation protection research Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 241-6
Visschers V H M and Siegrist M 2013 How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster Risk Anal. 33 333-47
Wojcik A, Hamza K, Lundegård I, Enghag M, Haglund K, Arvanitis L and Schenk L 2018 Educating about radiation risks in high schools: towards improved public understanding of the complexity of low-dose radiation health effects Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 58 13-20
Železnik N, Constantin M, Schneider N, Mays C, Zakrzewska G and Diaconu D 2016 Lay public mental models of ionizing radiation: representations and risk perception in four European countries J. Radiol. Prot. 36 S102-21