Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence. Discourse-oriented and theoretical approache

doi:10.1075/prag.29.2

Download

Complete issue (Scientific journals)

Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence. Discourse-oriented and theoretical approache

Gentens, Caroline; Sansiñena, María Sol; Spronck, Stef et al.

2019 • In Pragmatics, 29 (2)

Peer reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/232078

DOI
10.1075/prag.29.2

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

CG_MSS_SS_AVL_2019_intro_perspective_pragmatics.pdf

Author postprint (488.12 kB)

introductory article of SI

Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Research center :

Lilith - Liège, Literature, Linguistics - ULiège

Disciplines :

Languages & linguistics

Editor :

Gentens, Caroline

Sansiñena, María Sol

Spronck, Stef

Van linden, An ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de langues modernes : ling., litt. et trad. > Linguistique synchronique anglaise

Language :

English

Title :

Irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence. Discourse-oriented and theoretical approache

Publication date :

2019

Journal title :

Pragmatics

ISSN :

1018-2101

Publisher :

IPrA Research Center, Belgium

Volume :

Issue :

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Commentary :

Special Issue arising from the workshop "Perspective-indexing constructions: irregular perspective shifts and perspective persistence" at SLE 49, convened by Caroline Gentens (University of Leuven), María Sol Sansiñena (University of Leuven & University of Ghent), Stef Spronck (University of Leuven), An Van linden (FRNS - Catholic University of Louvain)

Available on ORBi :

since 23 January 2019

Statistics

Number of views

89 (19 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

50 (14 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1990. “The Role of Quotations in Andean Discourse.” In Unity in Diversity: Papers Presented to Simon C. Dik on His 50th Birthday, ed. by Harm Pinkster, and Inge Genee, 1–12. Dordrecht and Providence, RI: Foris publications. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110847420.1
Banfield, Ann. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Cornillie, Bert, and Barbara De Cock (eds). 2015. Hearer-Orientation in Spoken Genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
De Smet, Hendrik, and Jean-Christophe Verstraete. 2006. “Coming to Terms with Subjectivity.” Cognitive Linguistics 17: 365–392.
Dancygier, Barbara, Wei-Lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen. 2016. Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning. Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities. Berlin: Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110365467
Evans, Nick. 2006. “View with a View: Towards a Typology of Multiple Perspective Constructions.” In Proceedings of the Thirty-first Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Rebecca T. Cover, and Yuni Kim, 93–120. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Evans, Nick, Henrik Bergqvist, and Lila San Roque. 2018. “The Grammar of Engagement I: Framework and Initial Exemplification.” Language and Cognition 10 (1): 110–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2017.21
Everett, Daniel. 2008. “Wari’ Intentional State Constructions.” In Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface, ed. by Robert D. van Valin, 381–409. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.105.27eve
Gentens, Caroline. 2016. “The Factive-Reported Distinction in English. Representational and Interpersonal Semantics.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leuven.
Gentens, Caroline, and Kristin Davidse. 2017. “Reconceptualizing Factivity: a New View on the Semantics of Factive Constructions.” Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics 35 (6): 65–95.
Ghesquière, Lobke, Lot Brems, and Freek van de Velde (eds). 2014. Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Güldemann, Tom. 2008. Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211450
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London: Arnold.
Hinterwimmer, Stefan, and Petra B. Schumacher (eds). 2017. Special Issue on Perspective Taking. Glossa (2) 1.
Konnerth, Linda. 2016. “Speech-act Participant Perspectives in Quotative Constructions of Monsang.” Paper presented at SLE49, University of Naples, 31 August – 3 September 2016.
Konnerth, Linda. Subm. “Recycling through Perspective Persistence in Monsang (Trans-Himalayan): Reconstructing the Desiderative from a Reported Intentionality Construction.” Functions of Language.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Levinson, Stephen. 2006. “Deixis.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory L. Ward, 97–120. Malden, MA: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch5
McGregor, William B. 1994. “The Grammar of Reported Speech and Thought in Gooniyandi.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 14 (1): 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268609408599502
McGregor, William B. 2007. “A Desiderative Complement Construction in Warrwa.” In Language Description, History and Development: Linguistic Indulgence in Memory of Terry Crowley, ed. by Jeff Siegel, John Lynch, and Diana Eades, 27–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.30.08mcg
Munro, Robert, Rainer Ludwig, Uli Sauerland, and David W. Fleck. 2012. “Reported Speech in Matses: Perspective Persistence and Evidential Narratives.” International Journal of American Linguistics 78 (1): 41–75. https://doi.org/10.1086/662637
Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1993. “Indexicality and Deixis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 16:1–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984721
Pascual, Esther. 2014. Fictive Interaction: The Conversation Frame in Thought, Language, and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.47
Reinhart, Tanya. 1975. “Whose Main Clause? Point of View in Sentences with Parentheticals.” In Harvard Studies of Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 1, ed. by Susumu Kuno, 127–171. Cambridge, MA: Dept. of Linguistics, Harvard University.
Rumsey, Alan. 2001. “On the Syntax and Semantics of Trying.” In Forty Years on: Ken Hale and Australian Languages, ed. by Jane Simpson, David Nash, Mary Laughren, Peter Austin, and Barry Alpher, 353–63. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
San Roque, Lila, and Henrik Bergqvist (eds). 2015. Special Issue on Epistemic Marking in Typological Perspective. STUF – Language Typology and Universals.
San Roque, Lila, Floyd, Simeon, and Elisabeth Norcliffe. 2017. “Evidentiality and Interrogativity.” Lingua 186–187: 120–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.003
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Keith H. Basso, and Henry A. Selby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Spronck, Stef. 2012. “Minds Divided, Speaker Attitudes in Quotatives.” In Quotatives: Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller, and Ingrid van Alphen, 71–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15.07spr
Spronck, Stef. 2015. “Reported Speech in Ungarinyin: Grammar and Social Cognition in a Language of the Kimberley Region, Western Australia.” Ph.D. dissertation, Canberra: Australian National University.
Spronck, Stef. 2017. “Defenestration: Deconstructing the Frame-in Relation in Ungarinyin.” Journal of Pragmatics 114: 104–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.016
Spronck, Stef, An Van linden, Caroline Gentens, and Maria S. Sansiñena (eds.). Subm. Notes from the Field on Perspective-Indexing Constructions: Irregular Shifts and Perspective Persistence. Functions of Language.
Steever, Sanford B. 2002. “Direct and Indirect Discourse in Tamil.” In Reported Discourse: A Meeting Ground for Different Linguistic Domains, ed. by Tom Güldemann, and Manfred von Roncador, 91–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.52.07ste
Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2004a. “From Representational to Scopal Distancing Indirect Speech or Thought: A Cline of Subjectification.” Text 24 (4): 547–585. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2004.24.4.547
Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2004b. “Deixis and Grounding in Speech and Thought Representation.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 489–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.003
Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2009. Speech and Thought Representation in English. A Cognitive-Functional Perspective. Berlin: Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215373
Vanparys, Johan. 1996. Categories and Complements of Illocutionary Verbs in a Cognitive Perspective. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2007. Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy. Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110918199
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2008. “The Status of Purpose, Reason and Intended Endpoint in the Typology of Complex Sentences: Implications for Layered Models of Clause Structure.” Linguistics 46: 757–788. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.025
von Roncador, Manfred. 1980. “Gibt die Redewiedergabe Rede wieder?” L.A.U.T. (Linguistic Agency University of Trier), Series A: Paper no. 71.
von Roncador, Manfred. 1988. Zwischen direkter und indirekter Rede: Nichtwörtliche direkte Rede, erlebte Rede, logophorische Konstruktionen und Verwandtes. Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111678764