Assessing Command-Following and Communication With Vibro-Tactile P300 Brain-Computer Interface Tools in Patients With Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome.
[en] Persons diagnosed with disorders of consciousness (DOC) typically suffer from motor disablities, and thus assessing their spared cognitive abilities can be difficult. Recent research from several groups has shown that non-invasive brain-computer interface (BCI) technology can provide assessments of these patients' cognitive function that can supplement information provided through conventional behavioral assessment methods. In rare cases, BCIs may provide a binary communication mechanism. Here, we present results from a vibrotactile BCI assessment aiming at detecting command-following and communication in 12 unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) patients. Two different paradigms were administered at least once for every patient: (i) VT2 with two vibro-tactile stimulators fixed on the patient's left and right wrists and (ii) VT3 with three vibro-tactile stimulators fixed on both wrists and on the back. The patients were instructed to mentally count either the stimuli on the left or right wrist, which may elicit a robust P300 for the target wrist only. The EEG data from -100 to +600 ms around each stimulus were extracted and sub-divided into 8 data segments. This data was classified with linear discriminant analysis (using a 10 x 10 cross validation) and used to calibrate a BCI to assess command following and YES/NO communication abilities. The grand average VT2 accuracy across all patients was 38.3%, and the VT3 accuracy was 26.3%. Two patients achieved VT3 accuracy >/=80% and went through communication testing. One of these patients answered 4 out of 5 questions correctly in session 1, whereas the other patient answered 6/10 and 7/10 questions correctly in sessions 2 and 4. In 6 other patients, the VT2 or VT3 accuracy was above the significance threshold of 23% for at least one run, while in 4 patients, the accuracy was always below this threshold. The study highlights the importance of repeating EEG assessments to increase the chance of detecting command-following in patients with severe brain injury. Furthermore, the study shows that BCI technology can test command following in chronic UWS patients and can allow some of these patients to answer YES/NO questions.
Disciplines :
Neurology
Author, co-author :
Guger, Christoph
Spataro, Rossella
Pellas, Frederic
Allison, Brendan Z.
Heilinger, Alexander
Ortner, Rupert
Cho, Woosang
Xu, Ren
La Bella, Vincenzo
Edlinger, Gunter
Annen, Jitka ; Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA : Coma Group
✱ These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Language :
English
Title :
Assessing Command-Following and Communication With Vibro-Tactile P300 Brain-Computer Interface Tools in Patients With Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome.
Acqualagna L., Botrel L., Vidaurre C., Kübler A., Blankertz B., (2016). Large-scale assessment of a fully automatic co-adaptive motor imagery-based brain computer interface. PLoS ONE 11:e0148886. 10.1371/journal.pone.014888626891350
Ahn S., Kim K., Jun S. C., (2016). Steady-state somatosensory evoked potential for brain-computer interface-present and future. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:716. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.0071626834611
Allison B. Z., Cho W., Ortner R., Heilinger A., Edlinger G., Guger C., (2017). Validation of a brain-computer interface (BCI) system designed for patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC), regular and sham testing with healthy participants, in International Conference on Augmented Cognition (Cham: Springer), 253–265.
Bin G., Gao X., Yan Z., Hong B., Gao S., (2009). An online multi-channel SSVEP-based brain-computer interface using a canonical correlation analysis method. J Neural Eng. 6:046002. 10.1088/1741-2560/6/4/04600219494422
Chaudhary U., Xia B., Silvoni S., Cohen L. G., Birbaumer N., (2017). Brain-computer interface-based communication in the completely locked-in state. PLoS Biol. 15:e1002593. 10.1371/journal.pbio.100259328141803
Chennu S., Annen J., Wannez S., Thibaut A., Chatelle C., Cassol H., et al. (2017). Brain networks predict metabolism, diagnosis and prognosis at the bedside in disorders of consciousness. Brain 140, 2120–2132. 10.1093/brain/awx16328666351
Cruse D., Chennu S., Chatelle C., Bekinschtein T. A., Fernández-Espejo D., Pickard J. D., et al. (2011). Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state, a cohort study. Lancet 378, 2088–2094. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61224-522078855
Cruse D., Chennu S., Chatelle C., Fernández-Espejo D., Bekinschtein T. A., Pickard J. D., Laureys S., et al. (2012). Relationship between etiology and covert cognition in the minimally conscious state. Neurology 78, 816–822. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318249f76422377810
Fazel-Rezai R., Allison B. Z., Sellers E., Guger C., Kleih S., Kübler A., (2012). P300 brain computer interfaces, Current challenges and future directions. Front. Neuroeng. 5:14. 10.3389/fneng.2012.00014
Giacino J. T., Fins J. J., Laureys S., Schiff N. D., (2012). Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury, the state of the science. Nat. Rev. 10, 99–114. 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.27924468878
Giacino J. T., Kalmar K., Whyte J., (2004). The JFK coma recovery scale-revised, measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 2020–2029. 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.03315605342
Gibson R. M., Chennu S., Fernández-Espejo D., Naci L., Owen A. M., Cruse D., (2016). Somatosensory attention identifies both overt and covert awareness in disorders of consciousness. Ann. Neurol. 80, 412–423. 10.1002/ana.2472627422169
Gibson R. M., Fernández-Espejo D., Gonzalez-Lara L., Kwan B. Y., Lee D. H., Owen A. M., et al. (2014). Multiple tasks and neuroimaging modalities increase the likelihood of detecting covert awareness in patients with disorders of consciousness. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:950, 10.3389/fnhum.2014.0095025505400
Guger C., Coyle D., Mattia D., De Lucia M., Hochberg L., Edlow B., et al. (2017a). Trends in BCI Research I, Brain-computer interfaces for assessment of patients with locked-in syndrome or disorders of consciousness, in Brain-Computer Interface Research, eds Guger C., Lebedev M., Allison B., A State-of-the-art Summary 6, (Cham: Springer), 105–125.
Guger C., Daban S., Sellers E., Hollander C., Krausz G., Carabalona R., et al. (2009). How many people are able to control a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? Neurosci. Lett. 462, 94–98. 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.04519545601
Guger C., Edlinger G., Harkam W., Niedermayer I., Pfurtscheller G., (2003). How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 11, 145–147. 10.1109/TNSRE.2003.81448112899258
Guger C., Ortner R., Allison B. Z., (2016). A comparison of face speller approaches for P300 BCIs, in IEEE SMC (Budapest).
Guger C., Sorger B., Noirhomme Q., Naci L., Monti M. M., Real R., et al. (2014). Brain-computer interfaces for assessment and communication in disorders of consciousness, in Emerging Theory and Practice in Neuroprosthetics, eds Ganesh R. N., Gui Y., (IGI Global), 181–214. 10.4018/978-1-4666-6094-6.ch01028809822
Guger C., Spataro R., Allison B. Z., Heilinger A., Ortner R., Cho W., et al. (2017b). Complete locked-in and locked-in patients: command following assessment and communication with vibro-tactile P300 and motor imagery brain-computer interface tools. Front Neurosci. 11:251. 10.3389/fnins.2017.0025128529473
Lombardi F., Gatta G., Sacco S., Muratori A., Carolei A., (2007). The Italian version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Funct. Neurol. 22, 47–61. 17509244
Lugo Z. R., Rodriguez J., Lechner A., Ortner R., Gantner I. S., Kübler A., et al. (2014). A vibrotactile P300-based BCI for consciousness detection and communication. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 45, 14–21. 10.1177/1550059413505533
Monti M. M., Vanhaudenhuyse A., Coleman M. R., Boly M., Pickard J. D., Tshibanda L., et al. (2010). Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. New Engl. J. Med. 362, 579–589. 10.1056/NEJMoa090537020130250
Nam C. S., Nijholt A., Lotte F., (2018). Brain–Computer Interfaces Handbook, Technological and Theoretical Advances. CRC Press.
Ortner R., Allison B. Z., Heilinger A., Sabathiel N., Guger C., (2017). Assessment of and communication for persons with disorders of consciousness. J. Vis. Exp. 126:53639. 10.3791/53639
Patterson J. R., Grabois M., (1986). Locked-in syndrome, a review of 139 cases. Stroke, 17, 758–764. 10.1161/01.STR.17.4.7583738962
Piarulli A., Bergamasco M., Thibaut A., Cologan V., Gosseries O., Laureys S., (2016). EEG ultradian rhythmicity differences in disorders of consciousness during wakefulness. J. Neurol. 263, 1746–1760. 10.1007/s00415-016-8196-y27294259
Real R. G. L., Veser S., Erlbeck H., Risetti M., Vogel D., Müller F., et al. (2016). Information processing in patients in vegetative and minimally conscious states. Clin. Neurophysiol. 127, 1395–1402. 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.07.02026315366
Risetti M., Formisano R., Toppi J., Quitadamo L. R., Bianchi L., Astolfi L., et al. (2013). On ERPs detection in disorders of consciousness rehabilitation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:775. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.0077524312041
Rutkowski T. M., (2016). Robotic and virtual reality BCIs using spatial tactile and auditory oddball paradigms. Front. Neurorobot. 10:20. 10.3389/fnbot.2016.0002027999538
Wannez S., Heine L., Thonnard M., Gosseries O., Laureys S., (2017). The repetition of behavioral assessments in diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Ann. Neurol. 81, 883–889, 10.1002/ana.2496228543735
Wolpaw J. R., Birbaumer N., McFarland D. J., Pfurtscheller G., Vaughan T. M., (2002). Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113, 767–791. 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00057-312048038
Wolpaw J., Wolpaw E. W., (2012). Brain-Computer Interfaces, Principles and Practice. Oxford, USA: Oxford University Publishing.