Intolerance of uncertainty in parents of childhood cancer survivors: A clinical profile analysis

[en] Purpose: This research aimed to investigate the psychological adjustment related to the risk factor of intolerance of uncertainty in parents of childhood cancer survivors.Design: Participants were mothers (N = 45) and fathers (N = 16) of a childhood cancer survivor (from 4 until 6 years of cancer remission). Parents completed measures of intolerance of uncertainty and its associated factors (positive beliefs about worry, cognitive avoidance, rumination, and problem solving), measures of psychological distress (anxiety, depression somatization, and worries), and performed two Stroop tasks. Findings: A substantial subgroup of parents reported clinical levels of psychological distress and 64% reported a significant level of intolerance of uncertainty. Parents presented a high profile for intolerance of uncertainty (generalized anxiety disorder [GAD] profile) were those who had a high level of distress associated with ineffective psychological adjustment. Conclusion: The data are supportive of brief intervention to reduce intolerance of uncertainty. Sensitizing health care professionals to the identification of intolerance of uncertainty and its associated factors is essential for efficient intervention strategies.

Disciplines :

Oncology

Author, co-author :

Vander Haegen, Marie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Psychologie de la santé

Etienne, Anne-Marie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Psychologie > Psychologie de la santé

Language :

English

Title :

Intolerance of uncertainty in parents of childhood cancer survivors: A clinical profile analysis

Publication date :

14 November 2018

Journal title :

Journal of Psychosocial Oncology

ISSN :

0734-7332

eISSN :

1540-7586

Publisher :

The Haworth Medical Press, United States - New York

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2018.1499692

Available on ORBi :

since 27 November 2018

Statistics

Number of views

200 (15 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

74 (4 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Belgian Cancer Registry. Cancer incidence in Belgium, special issues: cancer in children and adolescents. 2017. http://www.kanker.be/sites/default/files/bcr_publicatiecancerburden2015.pdf
Lund LW, Schmiegelow K, Rechnitzer C, Johansen, C. A systematic review of studies on psychosocial late effects of childhood cancer: structures of society and methodological pitfalls may challenge the conclusions. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56(4):532–543.
Rodriguez Galindo C, Friedrich P, Morrissey L, Frazier, L. Global challenges in pediatric oncology. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2013;25(1), 3–15.
Brinkman TM, Zhu L, Zeltzer LK, et al. Longitudinal patterns of psychological distress in adult survivors of childhood cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(5), 1373–1381.
Wakefield CE, McLoone JK, Butow P, Lenthen K, & Cohn RJ. Parental adjustment to the completion of their child’s cancer treatment. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2011;56(4), 524–531.
Michel G, Taylor N, Absolom K, Eiser C. Benefit finding in survivors of childhood cancer and their parents: further empirical support for the Benefit Finding Scale for Children. Child Care, Health Dev. 2010;36(1), 123–129.
Van Schoors M, Caes L, Verhofstadt LL, Goubert L, Alderfer, M. Systematic review: family resilience after pediatric cancer diagnosis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2015;40(9), 856–868.
Turcotte LM, Liu Q, Yasui Y, et al. Temporal trends in treatment and subsequent neoplasm risk among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer, 1970–2015. JAMA. 2017;317(8), 814–824.
Vander Haegen M, Luminet O. Stress, psychosocial mediators and cognitive mediators in parents of child cancer patients and cancer survivors: attention and working memory pathway perspectives. J Psycho Oncol. 2015;33(5), 504–550.
Rosen NO, Ivanova E, Knäuper B. Differentiating intolerance of uncertainty from three related but distinct constructs. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2014;27(1), 55–73.
Zlomke KR, Jeter KM. Stress and worry: examining intolerance of uncertainty’s moderating effect. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2014;27(2), 202–215.
Carleton RN. Into the unknown: a review and synthesis of contemporary models involving uncertainty. J Anxiety Disord. 2016;39, 30–43.
Nelson BD, Shankman SA. Does intolerance of uncertainty predict anticipatory startle responses to uncertain threat? Int J Psychophysiol. 2011;81(2), 107–115.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6), 361–370.
Meyer TJ, Miller ML, Metzger RL, Borkovec, TD. Development and validation of the Penn state worry questionnaire. Behav Res Ther. 1990;28(6), 487–495.
Vander Haegen M, Etienne AM. Revised Penn state questionnaire; PSWQ-R15. 2015a [unpublished scale].
Vander Haegen M, Etienne AM. Psycho soma-oncology scale; PSOS. 2015b [unpublished scale].
Freeston MH, Rhéaume J, Letarte H, Dugas MJ, Ladouceur, R. Why do people worry? Pers Individ Dif. 1994;17(6), 791–802.
Gosselin P, Ladouceur R, Langlois F. Développement et validation d'un nouvel instrument mesurant les croyances erronées à l'égard des inquiétudes [Evaluation of worry: validation of a French translation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Eur Rev Appl Psychol. 2003;53, 199–211.
Gosselin P, Ladouceur R, Pelletier O. Évaluation de l’attitude d’un individu face aux différents problèmes de vie: le questionnaire d’attitude face aux problèmes (QAP). [Worry and problem solving: the role of negative problem orientation]. J Ther Comport Cogn. 2005;15(4), 141–153.
Gosselin P, Langlois F, Freeston MH. Le questionnaire d'évitement cognitif (QEC): développement et validation auprès d'adultes et d'adolescents [The Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire (CAQ): development and validation among adult and adolescent samples. J Ther Comport Cogn. 2002;12, 24–37.
Douilliez C, Heeren A, Lefèvre N, Watkins E, Barnard P, Philippot, P. Validation de la version française d’un questionnaire évaluant les pensées répétitives constructives et non constructives [A Short Questionnaire to Assess Constructive and Unconstructive Repetitive Thinking]. Can J Behav Sci. 2014;46(2), 185–192.
Inquisit 4 Lab-Primary. Computer Software. Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software LLC; 2014.
Beard C. Cognitive bias modification for anxiety: current evidence and future directions. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11(2), 299–311.
MacLeod C, Mathews A. Cognitive bias modification approaches to anxiety. Annual Rev Clin Psychol. 2012;8, 189–217.
Field A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS and Sex and Drugs and Rock’n’Roll. 4th ed. London, UK: Sage; 2013.