Request a copy

Full Text

• Afriat, S., Efficiency estimation of production functions. Int. Econ. Rev. 13 (1972), 568–598.
• Akkemik, K.A., Cost function estimates, scale economies and technological progress in the Turkish electricity generation sector. Energy Policy 1 (2009), 204–213.
• Arcos, A., De Toledo, P.A., An analysis of the Spanish electrical utility industry: economies of scale, technological progress and efficiency. Energy Econ. 31:3 (2009), 473–481.
• Ajayi, V., Weyman-Jones, T., Glass, A., Cost efficiency and electricity market structure: a case study of OECD countries. Energy Econ. 65 (2017), 283–291.
• Assaf, A.G., Barros, C.P., Managi, S., Cost efficiency of Japanese steam power generation companies: a Bayesian comparison of random and fixed frontier models. Appl. Energy 88 (2011), 1441–1446.
• Banker, R.D., Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 17 (1984), 35–44.
• Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag. Sci. 30 (1984), 1078–1092.
• Banker, R.D., Thrall, R.M., Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 62 (1992), 74–84.
• Bogetoft, P., DEA on relaxed convexity assumptions. Manag. Sci. 42 (1996), 457–465.
• Burns, P., Weyman-Jones, T.G., Cost functions and cost efficiency in electricity distribution: a stochastic frontier approach. Bull. Econ. Res. 48:1 (1996), 41–64.
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2 (1978), 429–444.
• Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Dierynck, B., Roodhooft, F., Sabbe, J., Opening the black box of efficiency measurement: input allocation in multi-output settings. Oper. Res. 61 (2013), 1148–1165.
• Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Walheer, B., Multi-output efficiency with good and bad outputs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240 (2015), 872–881.
• Cherchye, L., De Rock, B., Walheer, B., Multi-output profit efficiency and directional distance functions. Omega 61:C (2016), 100–109.
• Christensen, L.R., Greene, W.H., Economies of scale in US electric power generation. J. Polit. Econ., 1976, 655–676.
• Considine, T.J., Cost structures for fossil fuel-fired electric power generation. Energy J., 2000, 83–104.
• Despic, O., Despic, M., Paradi, J., DEA-r: ratio-based comparative efficiency model, its mathematical relation to DEA and its use in applications. J. Prod. Anal. 28 (2007), 33–44.
• Diewert, W.E., Parkan, C., Linear programming tests of regularity conditions for production frontiers. Quant. Stud. Prod. Prices, 1983.
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Network DEA. Socioecon. Plann. Sci. 34 (2000), 35–49.
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., A nonparametric cost approach to scale efficiency. Scand. J. Econ. 87 (1985), 594–604.
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Whittaker, G., Network DEA. Zhu, J., Cook, W., (eds.) Modeling Data Irregularities and Structural Complexities in Data Envelopment Analysis, 2007, Springer.
• Filippini, M., Economies of scale and utilization in the Swiss electric power distribution industry. Appl. Econ. 28:5 (1996), 543–550.
• Filippini, M., Wild, J., Regional differences in electricity distribution costs and their consequences for yardstick regulation of access prices. Energy Econ. 23:4 (2001), 477–488.
• Forsund, F.R., On the calculation of the scale elasticity in DEA models. J. Prod. Anal. 7 (1996), 283–302.
• Forsund, F.R., Hjalmarsson, L., Generalised Farrell measures of efficiency: an application to milk processing in Swedish dairy plants. Econ. J. 89 (1979), 294–315.
• Forsund, F.R., Hjalmarsson, L., Calculating scale elasticity in DEA models. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55 (2004), 1023–1038.
• Fraquelli, G., Piacenza, M., Vannoni, D., Cost savings from generation and distribution with an application to Italian electric utilities. J. Regul. Econ. 28:3 (2005), 289–308.
• Golany, B., Yu, G., Estimating returns to scale in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 103 (1997), 28–37.
• Hanoch, G., The elasticity of scale and the shape of average costs. Am. Econ. Rev. 65 (1975), 492–497.
• Hanoch, G., Rothschild, M., Testing assumptions of production theory: a nonparametric approach. J. Polit. Econ. 80 (1972), 256–275.
• Hiebert, L.D., The determinants of the cost efficiency of electric generating plants: a stochastic frontier approach. South. Econ. J., 2002, 935–946.
• Kleit, A.N., Terrell, D., Measuring potential efficiency gains from deregulation of electricity generation: a Bayesian approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 83:3 (2001), 523–530.
• Kopsakangas-Savolainen, M., Svento, R., Estimation of cost-effectiveness of the Finnish electricity distribution utilities. Energy Econ. 30:2 (2008), 212–229.
• Krautmann, A.C., Solow, J.L., Economies of scale in nuclear power generation. South. Econ. J., 1988, 70–85.
• Krivonozhko, V.E., Utkin, O.B., Volodin, A.V., Sablin, I.A., Patrin, M., Constructions of economic functions and calculations of marginal rates in DEA using parametric optimization methods. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55 (2004), 1049–1058.
• Kumbhakar, S.C., Amundsveen, R., Kvile, H.M., Lien, G., Scale economies, technical change and efficiency in Norwegian electricity distribution, 1998-2010. J. Prod. Anal. 43:3 (2015), 295–305.
• Maloney, M.T., Economies and diseconomies: estimating electricity cost functions. Rev. Ind. Organ. 19:2 (2001), 165–180.
• Nehring, K., Puppe, C., Modelling cost complementarities in terms of joint production. J. Econ. Theory 118 (2004), 252–264.
• Nelson, R.A., Returns to scale from variable and total cost functions: evidence from the electric power industry. Econ. Lett. 18:2 (1985), 271–276.
• Nelson, R.A., Wohar, M.E., Regulation, scale economies, and productivity in steam electric generation. Int. Econ. Rev., 1985, 57–79.
• Nemoto, J., Nakanishi, Y., Madono, S., Scale economies and over-capitalization in Japanese electric utilities. Int. Econ. Rev., 1993, 431–440.
• Panzar, J.C., Willig, R.D., Economies of scale in multi-output production. Q. J. Econ. 91 (1977), 481–493.
• Panzar, J.C., Willig, R.D., Economies of scope. Am. Econ. Rev. 71:2 (1981), 268–272.
• Petersen, N.C., Data envelopment analysis on a relaxed set of assumptions. Manag. Sci. 36 (1990), 305–314.
• Peyrache, A., Industry structural inefficiency and potential gains from mergers and break-ups: a comprehensive approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 230 (2013), 422–430.
• Podinovski, V.V., Forsund, F.R., Krivonozhko, V., A simple derivation of scale elasticities in data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 197 (2009), 149–153.
• Rhine, R., Economies of scale and optimal capital in nuclear and fossil fuel electricity production. Atl. Econ. J. 29:2 (2001), 203–214.
• Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J.J., Ecological modernization in the electrical utility industry: An application of a bads-goods DEA model of ecological and technical efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 219 (2012), 386–395.
• Salerian, J., Chan, C., Restricting multiple-output multiple-input DEA models by disaggregating the output-input vector. J. Prod. Anal. 24 (2005), 5–29.
• Simar, L., Wilson, P.W., Non-parametric tests of returns to scale. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 139 (2002), 115–132.
• Tone, K., Tsutsui, M., Network DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 197 (2009), 243–252.
• Tone, K., Tsutsui, M., Applying an Efficiency Measure of Desirable and Undesirable Outputs in DEA to U.S. Electric Utilities approach. J. CENTRUM Cathedra 4 (2011), 236–249.
• Varian, H.R., The non-parametric approach to production analysis. Econometrica 52 (1984), 579–598.
• Walheer, B., Cost Malmquist productivity index: an output-specific approach for group comparison. J. Prod. Anal., 2017 Accepted.
• Walheer, B., Disaggregation of the cost Malmquist productivity index with joint and output-specific inputs. Omega 75 (2018), 1–12.
• Zelenyuk, V., A scale elasticity measure for directional distance function and its dual: theory and DEA estimation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 228 (2006), 592–600.
• Zelenyuk, V., Aggregation of scale efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240 (2016), 269–277.