Paper published in a journal (Scientific congresses and symposiums)
3D Stochastic Modelling of Insulin Sensitivity in STAR: Virtual trials analysis
Uyttendaele, Vincent; Knopp, Jennifer L.; Shaw, Geoffrey M. et al.
2018In IFAC-PapersOnLine, p. 128-133
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
0078.pdf
Author preprint (542.87 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Critical Care; Glycaemic control; Virtual trial; Stochastic Modelling; Insulin; Insulin Sensitivity
Abstract :
[en] Glycaemic control has shown beneficial outcomes for critically ill patients, but has been proven hard to achieve safely, increasing risk of hypoglycaemia. Patient metabolic variability is one of the main factor influencing glycaemic control safety and efficacy. STAR is a model-based glycaemic controller using a unique patient-specific risk-based dosing approach. STAR uses a 2D stochastic model, built from population data using kernel density methods, to determine potential forward future evolution in patient-specific insulin sensitivity (SIn+1), based on its current value (SIn). This study uses virtual trial to compare the current 2D stochastic model used in STAR, with a new 3D stochastic model. The new 3D model also uses prior insulin sensitivity value (SIn-1) to determine distribution of likely future SIn+1. A total of 587 virtual patient glycaemic control episodes longer than 24 hours from three different studies are used here. Safety (% blood glucose (BG) measurements < 4.0 and < 2.2 mmol/L), performance (% time in the target 4.4-8.0 mmol/L band), insulin administration and nutrition delivery (% goal feed) are compared. Results show similar performance (90% BG in 4.4-8.0 mmol/L), and similar safety, with slightly higher % BG < 4.0 mmol/L (0.9 vs. 1.4%) and % BG < 2.2 mmol/L (0.02 vs. 0.03%) for the 3D model, was achieved for similar workload. The slightly lower median BG level (6.3 vs. 6.0 mmol/L) for the 3D stochastic model is explained by the higher median insulin rate administered (2.5 vs. 3.0 U/hr). More importantly, simulation results showed higher nutrition delivery using the 3D stochastic model (92 vs. 99 % goal feed). The new 3D stochastic model achieved similar safety and performance than the 2D stochastic model in these virtual simulations, while increasing the total calorific intake. This higher nutritional intake is potentially associated with improved outcome in intensive care units. The 3D stochastic model thus better characterises patient-specific metabolic variability, allowing more optimal insulin and nutritional dosing. Therefore, a pilot clinical trial using the new 3D stochastic model could be realised to assess and compared clinical outcomes using the new stochastic model.
Research center :
GIGA-In silico Medicine
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Chrsitchurch, New Zealand
Disciplines :
Anesthesia & intensive care
Endocrinology, metabolism & nutrition
Engineering, computing & technology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Uyttendaele, Vincent ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Thermodynamique des phénomènes irréversibles
Knopp, Jennifer L.
Shaw, Geoffrey M.
Desaive, Thomas  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Thermodynamique des phénomènes irréversibles
Chase, J. Geoffrey
Language :
English
Title :
3D Stochastic Modelling of Insulin Sensitivity in STAR: Virtual trials analysis
Publication date :
2018
Event name :
10th IFAC Symposium on Biological and Medical Systems
Event place :
Sao Paulo, Brazil
Event date :
3-5 September 2018
Audience :
International
Journal title :
IFAC-PapersOnLine
ISSN :
2405-8971
eISSN :
2405-8963
Publisher :
IFAC Secretariat, Austria
Pages :
128-133
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique [BE]
Available on ORBi :
since 04 October 2018

Statistics


Number of views
57 (11 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
98 (2 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi