Reference : Measuring and comparing planning cultures: risk, trust and co-operative attitudes
Scientific congresses and symposiums : Unpublished conference/Abstract
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Human geography & demography
Business & economic sciences : Multidisciplinary, general & others
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Regional & inter-regional studies
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/228136
Measuring and comparing planning cultures: risk, trust and co-operative attitudes
English
Li, Keyang [Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen > > > >]
Dethier, Perrine mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Service de géographie économique (ECOGEO) >]
Eika, Anders [Norvegian University of Life Sciences > > > >]
Samsura, Ary [Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen > > > >]
Van der Krabben, Erwin [Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen > > > >]
Nordhal, Berith [Oslo Metropolitan University > > > >]
Halleux, Jean-Marie mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Service de géographie économique (ECOGEO) >]
28-Sep-2018
No
Yes
International
"Want to learn about experiments as instruments for collecting data in social science?"
28 septembre 2018
Oslo Metropolitan University
Oslo
Norvège
[en] Planning culture ; Game theory ; Belgium ; The Netherlands ; Norway
[en] [en] Cultural impacts in planning increasingly receive attention from both academics and practitioners around Europe. However, comparative planning cultures studies face the challenges of lacking systematic comparison and empirical evidence, especially on the micro level of planning actors’ behavior in interaction. This article aims to fill these gaps by (1) operationalizing the concept of planning culture; and (2) measuring and comparing it. We base our operationalization on the culturized planning model (Knieling & Othengrafen, 2009). We complement its explanatory power by building a link between planning culture and planning outcome through attitudes of planning actors. Three attitudes are focused in this article: attitudes of risk, trust and co-operation. To measure and compare these attitudes, we adopt three experimental economic games and conduct an experiment with public and private planning practitioners in three European countries: Belgium, the Netherlands and Norway. Both cross-country and public-private differences in these attitudes are tested in the experiment. Our experimental findings suggest that Dutch planning actors value risk aversion and trust; Norwegian planning actors value co-operation; while (French-speaking) Belgian planning actors do not value these variables that much. This empirical evidence is largely in line with more general evidence of differences in societal cultures in these countries.
Lepur : Centre de Recherche sur la Ville, le Territoire et le Milieu rural ; ECOGEO
JPI Urban Europe
SimCity Value Cap
Researchers ; Professionals
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/228136

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
28-9-2018 @ 2018 SimsCity Oslo Meeting.pptxPublisher postprint909.97 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.