Acoustic communication in marine shallow waters: testing the acoustic adaptive hypothesis in sand gobies

[en] Acoustic communication is an important part of social behaviour of fish species that live or breed in shallow noisy waters. Previous studies have shown that some fish species exploit a quiet window in the background noise for communication. However, it remains to be examined if hearing abilities and sound production of fish are adapted to marine habitats presenting high hydrodynamism. Here we investigated whether the communication system of the painted (Pomatoschistus pictus) and the marbled (P. marmoratus) gobies is adapted to enhance sound transmission and reception in Atlantic shallow water environments. We recorded and measured the sound pressure levels of social vocalizations of both species, as well as snapshots of ambient noise of habitats characterised by different hydrodynamism. Hearing thresholds (in terms of both sound pressure and particle acceleration) and responses to conspecific signals were determined using the Auditory Evoked Potential recording technique. We found that the peak frequency range (100-300 Hz) of acoustic signals matched the best hearing sensitivity in both species and appeared well adapted for short-range communication in Atlantic habitats. Sandy/rocky exposed beaches presented a quiet window, observable even during the breaking of moderate waves, coincident with the main sound frequencies and best hearing sensitivities of both species. Our data demonstrates that the hearing abilities of these gobies are well suited to detect conspecific sounds within typical interacting distances (few body-lengths) in Atlantic shallow waters. These findings lend support to the acoustic adaptive hypothesis, under the sensory drive framework, proposing that signals and perception systems coevolve to be effective within local environment constraints.

Disciplines :

Aquatic sciences & oceanology

Author, co-author :

Amorim, M. Clara P.

Vasconcelos, Raquel O.

Bolgan, Marta ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Evolution > Morphologie fonctionnelle et évolutive

Pedroso, Silvia S.

Fonseca, Paulo J.

Language :

English

Title :

Acoustic communication in marine shallow waters: testing the acoustic adaptive hypothesis in sand gobies

Publication date :

31 August 2018

Journal title :

Journal of Experimental Biology

ISSN :

0022-0949

eISSN :

1477-9145

Publisher :

The Company of Biologists, United Kingdom

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 26 September 2018

Statistics

Number of views

46 (3 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

78 (1 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Alves, D., Amorim, M. C. P. and Fonseca, P. J. (2016). Assessing acoustic communication active space in the Lusitanian toadfish. J. Exp. Biol. 219, 1122-1129.
Amorim, M. C. P. (2006). Diversity of sound production in fish. In Communication in fishes. Vol. 1 (ed. F. Ladich S. P. Collin and P., Moller and B.G. Kapoor), pp. 71-104. Enfield: Science Publishers.
Amorim, M. C. P. and Neves, A. S. M. (2007). Acoustic signalling during courtship in the painted goby, Pomatoschistus pictus. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 87, 1017-1023.
Amorim, M. C. P. and Neves, A. S. M. (2008). Male painted gobies (Pomatoschistus pictus) vocalise to defend territories. Behaviour 145, 1065-1083.
Amorim, M. C. P., Pedroso, S. S., Bolgan, M., Jordão, J. M., Caiano, M. and Fonseca, P. J. (2013). Painted gobies sing their quality out loud: acoustic rather than visual signals advertise male quality and contribute to mating success. Funct. Ecol. 27, 289-298.
Amorim, M. C. P., Vasconcelos, R. O. and Fonseca, P. J. (2015). Fish sounds and mate choice. In Sound Communication in Fishes, Vol. 4 (ed. F. Ladich), pp. 1-33. Wien: Springer-Verlag.
Amoser, S. and Ladich, F. (2005). Are hearing sensitivities of freshwater fish adapted to the ambient noise in their habitats? J. Exp. Biol. 208, 3533-3542.
Amoser, S. and Ladich, F. (2010). Year-round variability of ambient noise in temperate freshwater habitats and its implications for fishes. Aquat. Sci. 72, 371-378.
Barimo, J. F. and Fine, M. L. (1998). Relationship of swim-bladder shape to the directionality pattern of underwater sound in the oyster toadfish. Can. J. Zool. 76, 134-143.
Belanger, A. J., Bobeica, I. and Higgs, D. M. (2010). The effect of stimulus type and background noise on hearing abilities of the round goby Neogobius melanostomus. J. Fish Biol. 77, 1488-1504.
Bolgan, M., Pedroso, S. S., Picciulin, M., Fonseca, P. J. and Amorim, M. C. P. (2013). Differential investment in acoustic communication during social interactions in two closely related sand goby species. Behaviour 150, 133-152.
Boncoraglio, G. and Saino, N. (2007). Habitat structure and the evolution of bird song: a meta-analysis of the evidence for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Funct. Ecol. 21, 134-142.
Bouchereau, J. L., Houder, V., Marques, A. and Rebelo, J. E. (2003). A new distribution record and the reproductive strategy of Pomatoschistus pictus adriaticus (Pisces: Gobiidae) in the Mediterranean Sea. J. Mar. Biol. 83, 1157-1161.
Boughman, J. W. (2002). How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 571-577.
Bradbury, J. W. and Vehrencamp, S. L. (2011). Principles of Animal Communication, 2nd ed. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
Braun, C. B. and Grande, T. (2008). Evolution of peripheral mechanisms for the enhancement of sound reception. In Fish Bioacoustics (ed. J. F. Webb, A. N. Popper and R. R. Fay), pp. 99-144. New York: Springer.
Chapman, C. J. and Johnstone, A. D. (1974). Some auditory discrimination experiments on marine fish. J. Exp. Biol. 61, 521-528.
Codarin, A., Wysocki, L. E., Ladich, F. and Picciulin, M. (2009). Effects of ambient and boat noise on hearing and communication in three fish species living in a Marine Protected Area (Trieste, Italy). Mar. Poll. Bull. 58, 1880-1887.
Coers, A., Bouton, N., Vincourt, D. and Slabbekoorn, H. (2008). Fluctuating noise conditions may limit acoustic communication distance in rock-pool blenny. Bioacoustics 17, 63-64.
Crawford, J. D., Jacob, P. and Benech, V. (1997). Sound production and reproductive ecology of strongly acoustic fish in Africa: Pollimyrus isidori, Mormyridae. Behaviour 134, 677-725.
da Cunha, P. L. and Antunes, M. M. (2008). Notes on Gobiidae (Teleostei) from soft bottom of the Portuguese coast. Cybium 32, 309-315.
Dooling, R. J., Leek, M. R. and Popper, A. N. (2015). Effects of noise on fishes: What we can learn from humans and birds. Integr Zool. 10, 29-37.
Endler, J. A. (1992). Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139, 125-153.
Erbe, C., Reichmuth, C., Cunningham, K., Lucke, K. and Dooling, R. (2016). Communication masking in marine mammals: a review and research strategy. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 103, 15-38.
Ey, E. and Fischer, J. (2009). The "acoustic adaptation hypothesis"-a review of the evidence from birds, anurans and mammals. Bioacoustics 19, 21-48.
Fine, M. L., Heba, A. A., Nguyen, T. K., Mok, H.-K. and Parmentier, E. (2018). Development and sexual dimorphism of the sonic system in three deep-sea neobythitine fishes and comparisons between upper mid and lower continental slope. Deep Sea Res. Part I 131, 41-53.
Ladich, F. (2013). Effects of noise on sound detection and acoustic communication in fishes. In Animal Communication and Noise. Animal Signals and Communication 2 (ed. H. Brumm), pp. 65-90. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Ladich, F. and Fay, R. R. (2013). Auditory evoked potential audiometry in fish. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 23, 317-364.
Ladich, F. and Fine, M. (2006). Sound-generating mechanisms in fishes: a unique diversity in vertebrates. In Communication in Fishes, Vol. 1 (ed. F. Ladich, S. P. Collin, P. Moller and B. G. Kapoor), pp. 3-43. Enfield: Science Publishers.
Ladich, F. and Winkler, H. (2017). Acoustic communication in terrestrial and aquatic vertebrates. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 2306-2317.
Lindström, K. and Lugli, M. (2000). A quantitative analysis of the courtship acoustic behaviour and sound patterning in male sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Environ. Biol. Fishes 58, 411-424.
Lugli, M. (2010). Sounds of shallow water fishes pitch within the quiet window of the habitat ambient noise. J. Comp. Physiol. A 196, 439-451.
Lugli, M. (2015). Habitat acoustics and the low-frequency communication of shallow water fishes. In Sound Communication in Fishes (ed. F. Ladich), pp. 175-206. Wien: Springer-Verlag.
Lugli, M. and Fine, M. L. (2003). Acoustic communication in two freshwater gobies: ambient noise and short-range propagation in shallow streams. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 512-521.
Lugli, M. and Torricelli, P. (1999). Prespawning sound production in mediterranean sand-gobies. J. Fish Biol. 54, 691-694.
Lugli, M., Yan, H. Y. and Fine, M. L. (2003). Acoustic communication in two freshwater gobies: the relationship between ambient noise, hearing thresholds and sound spectrum. J. Comp. Physiol. A 189, 309-320.
Malavasi, S., Collatuzzo, S. and Torricelli, P. (2008). Interspecific variation of acoustic signals in Mediterranean gobies (Perciformes, Gobiidae): comparative analysis and evolutionary outlook. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 93, 763-778.
Maruska, K. P. and Sisneros, J. A. (2016). Comparison of electrophysiological auditory measures in fishes. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 877, 227-254.
Maruska, K. P. and Tricas, T. C. (2009). Encoding properties of auditory neurons in the brain of a soniferous damselfish: response to simple tones and complex conspecific signals. J. Comp. Physiol. A 195, 1071-1088.
Miller, P. J. (1986). Gobiidae. In: Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean (ed. P. J. P. Whitehead, M.-L. Bauchot, J.-C. Hureau and J. Nielsen). Paris: Unesco.
Morton, E. S. (1975). Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am. Nat. 109, 17-34.
Parmentier, E. and Fine, M. L. (2016). Fish sound production: insights. In Vertebrate Sound Production and Acoustic Communication (ed. R. A. Suthers, F. Tecumseh, R. R. Fay and A. N. Popper), pp. 19-46. Switzerland: Springer Handbook of Auditory Research 53.
Parsons, M. J. G., McCauley, R. D., Mackie, M. C., Siwabessy, P. J. and Duncan, A. J. (2012). In situ source levels of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus) calls. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 3559-3568.
Pedroso, S. S., Barber, I., Svensson, O., Fonseca, P. J. and Amorim, M. C. P. (2013). Courtship sounds advertise species identity and male quality in sympatric Pomatoschistus spp. Gobies. PloS One 8, e64620.
Radford, C. A., Ghazali, S., Jeffs, A. G. and Montgomery, J. C. (2015). Vocalisations of the bigeye Pempheris adspersa: characteristics, source level and active space. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 940-948.
Rogers, P. H. and Cox, M. (1988). Underwater sound as a biological stimulus. In Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals (ed. J. Atema R. R. Fay A. N. Popper and W. N. Tavolga), pp. 131-149. New York: Springer.
Rollo, A. and Higgs, D. (2008). Differential acoustic response specificity and directionality in the round goby, Neogobius melanostomus. Anim. Behav. 75, 1903-1912.
Speares, P., Holt, D. and Johnston, C. (2011). The relationship between ambient noise and dominant frequency of vocalizations in two species of darters (Percidae: Etheostoma). Environ. Biol. Fish. 90, 103-110.
Stevens, M. (2013). Sensory Ecology, Behaviour, and Evolution. Oxford University Press.
Urick, R. J. (1983). Principles of Underwater Sound. Los Altos: Peninsula Publishing.
Vasconcelos, R. O. and Ladich, F. (2008). Development of vocalization, auditory sensitivity and acoustic communication in the Lusitanian toadfish Halobatrachus didactylus. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 502-509.
Vasconcelos, R. O., Amorim, M. C. P. and Ladich, F. (2007). Effects of ship noise on the detectability of communication signals in the Lusitanian toadfish. J. Exp. Biol. 210, 2104-2112.
Vasconcelos, R. O., Sisneros, J. A., Amorim, M. C. P. and Fonseca, P. J. (2011a). Auditory saccular sensitivity of the vocal Lusitanian toadfish: low frequency tuning allows acoustic communication throughout the year. J. Comp. Physiol. A 197, 903-913.
Vasconcelos, R. O., Fonseca, P. J., Amorim, M. C. P. and Ladich, F. (2011b). Representation of complex vocalizations in the Lusitanian toadfish auditory system: evidence of fine temporal, frequency and amplitude discrimination. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 826-834.
Wilkins, M. R., Seddon, N. and Safran, R. J. (2013). Evolutionary divergence in acoustic signals: causes and consequences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 156-166.
Wysocki, L. E., Amoser, S. and Ladich, F. (2007). Diversity in ambient noise in European freshwater habitats: noise levels, spectral profiles, and impact on fishes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 2559-2566.
Zeyl, J. N., Love, O. P. and Higgs, D. M. (2013). Condition-dependent auditory processing in the round goby (Neogobius melanostomus): links to sex, reproductive condition and female estrogen levels. J. Exp. Biol. 216, 1075-1084.