[en] The aim of this study is to explore voice quality modifications in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) disease and to understand better the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the development of communicative disability. Biological Abstracts, BioMed Central, Cochrane database, PubMed and Scopus were assessed for subject headings using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) recommendations. Relevant studies published between January 1990 and December 2015 describing the evaluation of voice quality in LPR disease were retrieved. Issues of clinical relevance, such as LPR diagnosis method, treatment efficacy and outcomes, were evaluated for each study. We determined the grade of recommendation for each publication according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine evidence levels. The search identified 145 publications, of which 25 studies met the inclusion criteria for a total of 1483 LPR patients. Data were extracted by 2 independent physicians who identified 16 trials with a IIb evidence level, 7 trials with a IIa evidence level and 2 RCTs with a Ib evidence level where 4 patient-based instruments and 5 clinician-based instruments were used. The main voice assessment outcomes reported were hoarseness assessments by physicians or patients, followed by acoustic parameters; 15 and 14 articles, respectively, demonstrated significant improvements in subjective and objective voice assessments after treatment. The methodology used to measure acoustic parameters (i.e. sustained vowel duration, the sample portion choice for measurement, etc.) varied from one study to another. The majority of studies indicated that voice quality assessments (especially acoustic parameters) remain an interesting outcome to measure the effectiveness of treatment, but further studies using standardised and transparent methodology to measure acoustic parameters are necessary to confirm the place of each tool in the LPR disease evaluation.
Disciplines :
Otolaryngology
Author, co-author :
Lechien, J. R.; Laboratory of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Avenue du Champ de mars, 6, B7000, Mons, Belgium, Laboratory of Phonetics, Faculty of Psychology, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
Finck, Camille ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Phoniatrie
COSTA DE ARAUJO, Pedro ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Service d'ORL, d'audiophonologie et de chir. cervico-faciale
Huet, K.; Laboratory of Phonetics, Faculty of Psychology, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
Delvaux, Véronique; Laboratory of Phonetics, Faculty of Psychology, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
Piccaluga, M.; Laboratory of Phonetics, Faculty of Psychology, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
Harmegnies, B.; Laboratory of Phonetics, Faculty of Psychology, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
Saussez, S.; Laboratory of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Avenue du Champ de mars, 6, B7000, Mons, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Voice outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: a systematic review of 1483 patients
Koufman JA, Aviv JE, Casiano RR, Shaw GY (2002) Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127(1):32–35
Rees LE, Pazmany L, Gutowska-Owsiak D et al (2008) The mucosal immune response to laryngopharyngeal reflux. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177(11):1187–1193
Sen P, Georgalas C, Bhattacharyya AK (2006) A systematic review of the role of proton pump inhibitors for symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Clin Otolaryngol 31(1):20–24
Koufman JA (1991) The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-h pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope. 101(4 Pt 2 Suppl 53):1–78
Poelmans J, Feenstra L, Tack J (2006) Determinants of long-term outcome of patients with reflux-related ear, nose, and throat symptoms. Dig Dis Sci 51(2):282–288
Printza A, Kyrgidis A, Oikonomidou E, Triaridis S (2011) Assessing laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms with the Reflux Symptom Index: validation and prevalence in the Greek population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145(6):974–980
Koufman JA, Amin MR, Panetti M (2000) Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(4):385–388
Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA (2002) Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice 16(2):274–277
Pearson JP, Parikh S, Orlando RC et al (2011) Review article: reflux and its consequences–the laryngeal, pulmonary and oesophageal manifestations. Conference held in conjunction with the 9th International Symposium on Human Pepsin (ISHP) Kingston-upon-Hull, UK, 21–23 April 2010. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 33(Suppl 1):1–71
Hanson DG, Conley D, Jiang J, Kahrilas P (2000) Role of esophageal pH recording in management of chronic laryngitis: an overview. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 184:4–9
Ford CN (2005) Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux. JAMA 294(12):1534–1540
Sataloff RT, Castell DO, Katz PO, Sataloff DM (2006) Reflux laryngitis and related disorders, 3rd edn. Plural Publishing Inc, San Diego
Pribuisiene R, Uloza V, Kupcinskas L, Jonaitis L (2006) Perceptual and acoustic characteristics of voice changes in reflux laryngitis patients. J Voice 20(1):128–136
Lechien JR, Khalife M, Delvaux V et al (2014) Pathophysiology, assessment and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 135(4–5):163–170
Sansone RA, Sansone LA (2012) Hoarseness: a sign of self-induced vomiting? Innov Clin Neurosci 9(10):37–41
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(6):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097
Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA (2001) The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope 111(8):1313–1317
Vincent DA Jr, Garrett JD, Radionoff SL, Reussner LA, Stasney CR (2000) The proximal probe in esophageal pH monitoring: development of a normative database. J Voice 14(2):247–254
Sataloff RT, Hawkshaw MJ, Gupta R (2010) Laryngopharyngeal reflux and voice disorders: an overview on disease mechanisms, treatments, and research advances. Discov Med 10(52):213–224
Gupta R, Sataloff RT (2009) Laryngopharyngeal reflux: current concepts and questions. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 17(3):143–148
Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P et al. The 2011 Oxford CEBM Levels of Evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine
Systematic and literature review resources 2011. http://distillercer.com/resources. Accessed July 2015
Shaw GY, Searl JP (1997) Laryngeal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux before and after treatment with omeprazole. South Med J 90(11):1115–1122
Hamdan AL, Sharara AI, Younes A, Fuleihan N (2001) Effect of aggressive therapy on laryngeal symptoms and voice characteristics in patients with gastroesophageal reflux. Acta Otolaryngol 121(7):868–872
Siupsinskiene N, Adamonis K, Toohill RJ (2007) Quality of life in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients. Laryngoscope. 117(3):480–484
Ogut F, Ersin S, Engin EZ et al (2007) The effect of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication on laryngeal findings and voice quality. Surg Endosc 21(4):549–554
Beech TJ, Campbell G, McDermott AL, Batch AJ (2013) The effect of anti-reflux treatment on subjective voice measurements of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. J Laryngol Otol 127(6):590–594
Sahin M, Vardar R, Ersin S et al (2015) The effect of antireflux surgery on laryngeal symptoms, findings and voice parameters. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272(11):3375–3383
Ayazi S, Pearson J, Hashemi M (2012) Gastroesophageal reflux and voice changes: objective assessment of voice quality and impact of antireflux therapy. J Clin Gastroenterol 46(2):119–123
Kumar R, Bhat JS (2008) Aerodynamic Analysis Of Voice In Persons With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux. Online J Health Allied Scs 7(4):5
Ross JA, Noordzji JP, Woo P (1998) Voice disorders in patients with suspected laryngo-pharyngeal reflux disease. J Voice 12(1):84–88
Oguz H, Tarhan E, Korkmaz M et al (2007) Acoustic analysis findings in objective laryngopharyngeal reflux patients. J Voice 21(2):203–210
Akyildiz S, Ogut F, Varis A, Kirazli T, Bor S (2012) Impact of laryngeal findings on acoustic parameters of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 74(4):215–219
Siupsinskiene N, Adamonis K (2003) Diagnostic test with omeprazole in patients with posterior laryngitis. Medicina (Kaunas). 39(1):47–55
Vashani K, Murugesh M, Hattiangadi G et al (2010) Effectiveness of voice therapy in reflux-related voice disorders. Dis Esophagus 23(1):27–32
Habermann W, Schmid C, Neumann K, Devaney T, Hammer HF (2012) Reflux symptom index and reflux finding score in otolaryngologic practice. J Voice 26(3):e123–e127
Noordzij JP, Khidr A, Evans BA et al (2001) Evaluation of omeprazole in the treatment of reflux laryngitis: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study. Laryngoscope. 111(12):2147–2151
Lechien JR, Huet K, Khalife M et al (2015) Impact of laryngopharyngeal reflux on subjective and objective voice assessments: a prospective study. 122e annual meeting of the french society of oto-rhino-laryngology and head and neck surgery, Paris
Sereg-Bahar M, Jerin A, Jansa R, Stabuc B, Hocevar-Boltezar I (2015) Pepsin and bile acids in saliva in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux—a prospective comparative study. Clin Otolaryngol 40(3):234–239
Park JO, Shim MR, Hwang YS et al (2012) Combination of voice therapy and antireflux therapy rapidly recovers voice-related symptoms in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 146(1):92–97
Oyer SL, Anderson LC, Halum SL (2009) Influence of anxiety and depression on the predictive value of the Reflux Symptom Index. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 118(10):687–692
Elam JC, Ishman SL, Dunbar KB, Clarke JO, Gourin CG (2010) The relationship between depressive symptoms and Voice Handicap Index scores in laryngopharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope 120(9):1900–1903
Waring JP, Lacayo L, Hunter J, Katz E, Suwak B (1995) Chronic cough and hoarseness in patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux disease. Diagnosis and response to therapy. Dig Dis Sci 40(5):1093–1097
Williams RB, Szczesniak MM, Maclean JC, Brake HM, Cole IE, Cook IJ (2004) Predictors of outcome in an open label, therapeutic trial of high-dose omeprazole in laryngitis. Am J Gastroenterol 99(5):777–785
Sala E, Salminen P, Simberg S, Koskenvuo J, Ovaska J (2008) Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease treated with laparoscopic fundoplication. Dig Dis Sci 53(9):2397–2404
Millet B, Dejonckere PH (1998) What determines the differences in perceptual rating of dysphonia between experienced raters? Folia Phoniatr Logop 50(6):305–310
Paecher G, Holinger P (1947) CONTACT ULCER OF THE LARYNX II. the role of vocal reeducation. Arch Otolaryngol 46(5):617–623
Koufman JA (1995) Gastroesophageal reflux and voice disorders. In: Rubin JS, Sataloff RT, Korovin GS, Gould WJ (eds) Diagnosis and treatment of voice disorders. Igaku-Shoin, New-York and Tokyo, pp 161–175
Carding PN (2000) Evaluating voice therapy: measuring the effectiveness of treatment. Whurr Publishers, Philadelphia
Hirano M (1981) Clinical Examination of Voice. Springer, New York, pp 56–64
Dejonckere PH, Remacle M, Fresnel-Elbaz E, Woisard V, Crevier-Buchman L, Millet B (1996) Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 117(3):219–224
Jin bJ, Lee YS, Jeong SW, Jeong JH, Lee SH, Tae K (2008) Change of acoustic parameters before and after treatment in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients. Laryngoscope 118(5):938–941
Selby JC, Gilbert HR, Lerman JW (2003) Perceptual and acoustic evaluation of individuals with laryngopharyngeal reflux pre- and post-treatment. J Voice 17(4):557–570
Naiboglu B, Durmus R, Tek A, Toros SZ, Egeli E (2011) Do the laryngopharyngeal symptoms and signs ameliorate by empiric treatment in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux? Auris Nasus Larynx 38(5):622–627
Wo JM, Koopman J, Harrell SP, Parker K, Winstead W, Lentsch E (2006) Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with single-dose pantoprazole for laryngopharyngeal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 101(9):1972–1978 (quiz 2169)
Titze IR (1995) workshop on acoustic voice analysis: summary statement. National Center for Voice and Speech, Iowa City
Baken RJ (1987) Vocal fundamental frequency. In: Baken RJ, ed. Clinical measurement of speech and voice. Boston, MA: college-Hill Pess, pp 125–196
Murray T (1978) Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics associated with voice pathologies. J Speech Hear Disord. 43(3):374–379
Reijonen P, Lehikoinen-Söderlund S, Rihkanen H (2002) Results of fascial augmentation in unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 111(6):523–529
Dejonckere PH, Remacle M, Fresnel-Elbaz E, Woisard V, Crevier-Buchman L, Millet B. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 117(3):219–224
Beckett RL (1969) Pitch perturbation as a function of subjective vocal constriction. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 21(6):416–425
Hickson C, Simpson CB, Falcon R (2001) Laryngeal pseudosulcus as a predictor of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope 111(10):1742–1745
Yoshikawa H, Furuta K, Ueno M, Egawa M et al (2012) Oral symptoms including dental erosion in gastroesophageal reflux disease are associated with decreased salivary flow volume and swallowing function. J Gastroenterol 47(4):412–420
Zhu H, Xu W, Li Y, Cheng L (2014) Observation of clinicopathological characteristics of vocal fold leukoplakia and laryngopharyngeal reflux. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 49(5):368–373
Ogut F, Ersin S, Engin EZ et al (2007) The effect of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication on laryngeal findings and voice quality. Surg Endosc 21(4):549–554
Alberts et al, eds (2008) Cell junction, cell adhesion and the extracellular matrix. In: Molecular biology of the Cell. Garland Science, New York and London, pp 1131–1204
Hahn MS, Kobler JB, Starcher BC, Zeitels SM, Langer R (2006) Quantitative and comparative studies of the vocal fold extracellular matrix. I: elastic fibers and hyaluronic acid. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115:156–164
Lechien JR, Delvaux V, Huet K et al (2015) Phonetic approaches of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a prospective study. Sixth clinical phonetics day, Montpellier
Maryn Y, Roy N, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberge P, Corthals P (2009) Acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: a meta-analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 126(5):2619–2634
Fass R, Noelck N, Willis MR et al (2010) The effect of esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily on acoustic and perception parameters of the voice in laryngopharyngeal reflux. Neurogastroenterol Motil 22(2):134–141
Qua CS, Wong CH, Gopala K, Goh KL (2007) Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in chronic laryngitis: prevalence and response to acid-suppressive therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 25(3):287–295
Sinn DH, Kim JH, Kim S et al (2008) Response rate and predictors of response in a short-term empirical trial of high-dose rabeprazole in patients with globus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 27(12):1275–1281
de Bortoli N, Nacci A, Savarino E et al (2012) How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related? World J Gastroenterol 18(32):4363–4370
Koufman JA (2002) Laryngopharyngeal reflux is different from classic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ear Nose Throat J 81(9 Suppl 2):7–9
Cesari U, Galli J, Ricciardiello F, Cavaliere M, Galli V (2004) Dysphonia and laryngopharyngeal reflux. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 24(1):13–19
Hirano M (1981) The structure and control of the vocal fold as a vibrator. In: Clinical examination of voice. Springer-Verlag, Wien New York, pp 4–7
Jiang J (2006) Physiology of voice production:how does voice work? In: Benninger MS, Murry T (eds) The Performer’s Voice. Plural Publishing, San Diego, pp 23–32
Finck C (2008) Implantation d’acide hyaluronique estérifié lors de la microchirurgie des lésions cordales bénignes. Université de Liège, thèse de doctorat
Wan Y, Yan Y, Ma F, Wang L, Lu P, Maytag A, Jiang JJ (2014) LPR: how different diagnostic tools shape the outcomes of treatment. J Voice 28(3):362–368
Guo H, Ma H, Wang J (2015) Proton pump inhibitor therapy for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Gastroenterol, 16
Koufman JA (2011) Low-acid diet for recalcitrant laryngopharyngeal reflux: therapeutic benefits and their implications. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 120(5):281–287