Extreme right in Austria: who are "the people" (the case of the 'Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs')?

In recent years, the “Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs” (FPÖ) in Austria has claimed to be the “defender of the people” and “guarantor of their interests”. In 2016-2017, the FPÖ stood as the “voice of the oppressed majority”. The party is demanding “a direct democracy in order to let the people speak”. These elements lead us to question the notion of “the people”. How should we define “the people”? What reality does it refer to? What are the underlying political and ideological issues?
Firstly, to answer this question, I aim to clarify the term “the people” in populist rhetoric. The FPÖ is often described as “far-right party”. However, many scholars also refer to it as “populist party”. These terms clearly need explaining. Secondly, this work will analyse the political discourse of the FPÖ. The focus will be on the political programmes and oral communication coming from their principal representatives. This analysis is discursive. It isn’t an examination of the work performed by party supporters or members (parliamentary work, action in local authorities, etc.).
Apparently, the rhetoric from the FPÖ is structured around two dichotomies: 1) the removal of social boundaries in favour of a people/elite opposition; 2) the affirmation of cultural boundaries in favour of an opposition between natives to a country and foreigners. I will explain why these notions of social and cultural boundaries have a prominent place in rhetoric in line with populist theory. The desire to suppress social boundaries, allows us to identity a first issue: sovereignty. The affirmation of cultural boundaries illustrates a second issue: unity. Finally, a third issue is transmitted through the notion of sovereignty and unity: identity.
To conclude, I will return to the classification of the “Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs” as “right-wing-populist” party. I will end by answering the question: “who are ‘the people’”? This will explain why populist rhetoric responds to a feeling of unease within society and, more generally, within Western democracies.