Reference : Performance-based financing in low-income and middle-income countries: isn’t it time ...
Scientific journals : Article
Business & economic sciences : Special economic topics (health, labor, transportation…)
Human health sciences : Public health, health care sciences & services
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/218238
Performance-based financing in low-income and middle-income countries: isn’t it time for a rethink?
English
Paul, Elisabeth mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences sociales > Economie politique et économie de la santé >]
Albert, Lucien []
Bisala, Badibanga N'Sambuka []
et al. []
Ridde, Valéry []
Jan-2018
BMJ Global Health
3:e000664
Yes
International
[en] Performance-based financing (PBF) ; Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) ; Health policies ; Health systems
[en] This paper questions the view that performance-based financing (PBF) in the health sector is an effective, efficient and equitable approach to improving the performance of health systems in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). PBF was conceived as an open approach adapted to specific country needs, having the potential to foster system-wide reforms. However, as with many strategies and tools, there is a gap between what was planned and what is actually implemented. This paper argues that PBF as it is currently implemented in many contexts does not satisfy the promises. First, since the start of PBF implementation in LMICs, concerns have been raised on the basis of empirical evidence from different settings and disciplines that indicated the risks, cost and perverse effects. However, PBF implementation was rushed despite insufficient evidence of its effectiveness. Second, there is a lack of domestic ownership of PBF. Considering the amounts of time and money it now absorbs, and the lack of evidence of effectiveness and efficiency, PBF can be characterised as a donor fad. Third, by presenting itself as a comprehensive approach that makes it possible to address all aspects of the health system in any context, PBF monopolises attention and focuses policy dialogue on the short-term results of PBF programmes while diverting attention and resources from broader processes of change and necessary reforms. Too little care is given to systemwide and long-term effects, so that PBF can actually damage health services and systems. This paper ends by proposing entry points for alternative approaches.
Tax Institute
ARC grant for Concerted Research Actions, financed by the French Community of Belgium (Wallonia-Brussels Federation).
ARC Effi-Santé
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/218238
10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000664
http://gh.bmj.com/content/3/1/e000664

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
BMJGH_PBF in LMICs debate.pdfPublisher postprint353.52 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.