Unravelling the ‘ingredients’ of energy consumption: Exploring home-related practices in Belgium

Maréchal, Kevin; Holzemer, Laurence

doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.025

Request a copy

Article (Scientific journals)

Unravelling the ‘ingredients’ of energy consumption: Exploring home-related practices in Belgium

Maréchal, Kevin; Holzemer, Laurence

2018 • In Energy Research and Social Science, 39 (May 2018), p. 19-28

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/216274

DOI
10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.025

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

EnergyResearchAndSocialScience-KM.pdf

Publisher postprint (530.3 kB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Energy consumption; Theories of practice; Relationship with homes; Habits; Belgium

Abstract :

[en] To look at energy consumption through a different lens, we have developed the conceptual framework of habitual practices. The objective of the present paper is to propose an empirical application of this framework, with the aim of unravelling the constitutive ‘ingredients’ of energy-consuming practices. Therefore, we investigate whether discussing the relationship of people with their homes could help circumventing the methodological difficulties that inevitably arise when trying to approach less tangible (albeit crucial) elements such as norms and attached meanings. The empirical material comes from group conversations where participants discussed the extent to which a home has to be practical, comfortable and convivial in connection with a series of elements. The results confirm that this methodological setting generated useful insights for a finer understanding of energy-consuming practices and their underlying drivers. A related crucial finding is the role of key appliances – those with more contrasted use and attached meanings – which appear to mediate the interplay between comfort, conviviality, and practicality. A promising avenue for future research would thus be to further investigate the role of those key appliances as potential markers of wider tendencies in energy consumption and useful for designing segmentation strategies.

Disciplines :

Environmental sciences & ecology
Microeconomics
Sociology & social sciences

Author, co-author :

Maréchal, Kevin ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Agronomie, Bio-ingénierie et Chimie (AgroBioChem) > Modélisation et développement

Holzemer, Laurence

Language :

English

Title :

Unravelling the ‘ingredients’ of energy consumption: Exploring home-related practices in Belgium

Publication date :

2018

Journal title :

Energy Research and Social Science

ISSN :

2214-6296

eISSN :

2214-6326

Publisher :

Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Volume :

Issue :

May 2018

Pages :

19-28

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629617303559?via%3Dihub

Available on ORBi :

since 21 November 2017

Statistics

Number of views

113 (15 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

2 (2 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Lutzenhiser, S., Through the energy efficiency looking glass. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 1:1 (2014), 141–151.
Røpke, I., Theories of practice – new inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 2490–2497.
Shove, E., Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ. Plann. A 42:6 (2010), 1273–1285.
Wilhite, H., Bringing a more robust theory of consumption to the sustainable energy agenda. Proceedings of the MILEN International Conference: ‘Visions and Strategies to Address Sustainable Energy and Climate Change’ 25th–26th November 2010, Oslo, 2010 12 p.
Gram-Hanssen, K., Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption. J. Consum. Cult. 11:1 (2011), 61–78.
Sovacool, B.K., What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 1 (2014), 1–29.
Maréchal, K., Holzemer, L., Getting a (sustainable) grip on energy consumption: the importance of household dynamics and ‘habitual practices’. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 10 (2015), 228–239.
Shove, E., Putting practice into policy: reconfiguring questions of consumption and climate change. Contemp. Soc. Sci.: J. Acad. Soc. Sci. 9:4 (2014), 415–429.
Walker, G., The dynamics of energy demand: change, rhythm and synchronicity. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 1:1 (2014), 49–55.
Dubuisson-Quellier, S., Plessz, M., La thיorie des pratiques – Quels apports pour l’יtude sociologique de la consommation? (theories of practice – new insights for the sociology of consumption?). Sociologie, 4(4), 2013 http://sociologie.revues.org/2030.
Ellsworth-Krebs, K., Reid, L., Hunter, C.J., Home -ing in on domestic energy research: house, home, and the importance of ontology. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 6 (2015), 100–108.
Gabriel, M., Rooney, M., Watson, P., ‘The best house possible’: the everyday practices and micro-politics of achieving comfort in a low-cost home. Cook, N., Davison, A., Crabtree, L., (eds.) Housing and Home Unbound: Intersections in Economics, Environment and Politics in Australia, 2015, Routledge, London and New-York 240 p.
Evans, D., McMeekin, A., Southerton, D., Sustainable consumption, behaviour change policies and theories of practices. Warde, A., Southerton, D., (eds.) The Habits of Consumption. Studies Across Disciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences 12, 2012, Helsinki Collegium for Advances Studies, Helsinki, 113–129.
Halkier, B., Katz-Gerro, T., Martens, L., Applying practice theory to the study of consumption: theoretical and methodological considerations. J. Consum. Cult. 11:1 (2011), 3–13.
Hargreaves, T., Practice-ing behaviour change: applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. J. Consum. Cult. 11:1 (2011), 79–99.
Domaneschi, L., Food social practices: theory of practice and the new battlefield of food quality. J. Consum. Cult. 12:3 (2012), 306–322.
Fonte, M., Food consumption as social practices: solidarity purchasing groups in Rome, Italy. J. Rural Stud. 32 (2013), 230–239.
Horta, A., Fonseca, S., Truninger, M., Nobre, N., Correia, A., Mobile phones, batteries and power consumption: an analysis of social practices in Portugal. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13 (2016), 15–23.
Reckwitz, A., Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 5 (2002), 243–263.
Shove, E., Habits and their creatures. Warde, A., Southerton, D., (eds.) The Habits of Consumption. Studies Across Disciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences 12, 2012, Helsinki Collegium for Advances Studies, Helsinki, 100–112.
Southerton, D., Habits, routines and temporalities of consumption: from individual behaviours to the reproduction of everyday practices. Time Soc. 22 (2013), 335–355.
Browne, A., Can people talk together about their practices? Focus groups, humour and the sensitive dynamics of everyday life. Area 48:2 (2016), 198–205.
Shove, E., Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: the social organization of normality. 2003, Berg Publishers, Oxford and New York (ISBN 1859736300, 224 pp).
Burgess, J., Nye, M., Rematerialising energy use through transparent monitoring systems. Energy Policy 36 (2008), 4454–4459.
Hitchings, R., People can talk about their practices. Area 44:1 (2012), 61–67.
Schatzki, T., Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. 1996, Cambridge University Press.
Smith, S., The essential quality of a home. J. Environ. Psychol. 14:1 (1994), 31–46.
Gram-Hanssen, K., Bech-Danielsen, C., House, home and identity from a consumption perspective. Hous. Theory Soc. 21:1 (2004), 17–26.
Thogersen, J., Housing-related lifestyle and energy saving: a multi-level approach. Energy Policy 102 (2017), 73–87.
Despres, C., The meaning of home: literature review and directions for future research and theoretical development. J. Archit. Plann. Res. 8:2 (2016), 96–115.
Coolen, H., Meesters, J., House, home and dwelling. J. Hous. Built Environ. 27 (2012), 1–10.
Foulds, C., Powell, J., Seyfang, G., How moving home influences appliance ownership: a Passivhaus case study. Energy Effic. 9 (2016), 455–472.
Aniston, J., Towards a clearer understanding of the meaning of home. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 25:4 (2000), 251–262.
Mallett, S., Understanding home: a critical review of the literature. Sociol. Rev. 52 (2004), 62–89.
Easthope, H., A place called home Housing. Theory Soc. 21:3 (2004), 128–138.
Somerville, P., Homelessness and the meaning of home: rooflessness or rootlessness?. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 19:4 (1992), 226–245.
Rybczynski, W., Home: A Short History of an Idea. 1986, Penguin Books, New York.
Bryson, B., At Home: A Short History of Private Life. 2010, Doubleday Publishing Group, New-York.
Hand, M., Shove, E., Orchestrating concepts: kitchen dynamics and regime change in good housekeeping and ideal home, 1922–2002. Home Cult. 1 (2004), 235–256.
Shove, E., Converging conventions of comfort, cleanliness and convenience. J. Consum. Policy 26 (2003), 395–418.
Aune, M., Energy comes home. Energy Policy 35 (2007), 5457–5465.
Sixmith, J., The meaning of home: an exploratory study of environmental experience. J. Environ. Psychol. 6 (1986), 281–298.
Schatzki, T., The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. 2002, Pennsylvania University Press.
Jacobs, K., Malpas, J., Material objects, identity and the home: towards a relational housing research agenda. Housing. Theory Soc. 30 (2013), 281–292.
Wilhite, H., Ling, R., The person behind the meter: an ethnographic analysis of residential energy consumption in Oslo, Norway. Proceedings from the ACEEE 1992 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings 10, American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Washington, DC, 1992.
Chappell, H., Shove, E., Debating the future of comfort: environmental sustainability, energy consumption and the indoor environment. Build. Res. Inf. 33:1 (2005), 32–40.
Strengers, Y., Negotiating everyday life: the role of energy and water consumption feedback. J. Consum. Cult. 11:3 (2011), 319–338.
Walker, S.L., Lowery, D., Theobald, K., Low-carbon retrofits in social housing: interaction with occupant behavior. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2 (2014), 102–114.
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., Watson, M., The Dynamics of Social Practices -Everyday Life and How It Changes. 2012, Sage Publications.
Warde, A., Consumption and theories of practice. J. Consum. Cult. 5 (2005), 131–153.
Maréchal, K., The Economics of Climate Change and the Change of Climate in Economics. 2012, Routledge, London and New-York 190 pp.
Galvin, R., Sunikka-Blank, M., Schatzkian practice theory and energy consumption research: time for some philosophical spring cleaning?. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 22 (2016), 63–68.
Halkier, B., Routinization or reflexivity? Consumers and normative claims for environmental consideration. Gronow, J., Warde, A., (eds.) Ordinary Consumption, 2001, Routledge, London, 25–44.
Saunders, P., Williams, P., The constitution of the home: towards a research agenda. Hous. Stud. 3:2 (1988), 81–93.
Bloor, M., Focus Groups in Social Research. 2001, SAGE Publishing.