How can new players establish themselves in highly institutionalized labour markets? A Belgian case study in the area of project-based work

Xhauflair, Virginie; Huybrechts, Benjamin; Pichault, François

doi:10.1111/bjir.12281

Article (Scientific journals)

How can new players establish themselves in highly institutionalized labour markets? A Belgian case study in the area of project-based work

Xhauflair, Virginie; Huybrechts, Benjamin; Pichault, François

2018 • In British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56 (2), p. 370-394

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/214870

DOI
10.1111/bjir.12281

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

BJIR MS224 final.pdf

Author preprint (727.78 kB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

project-based work; LMI; quasi-union

Abstract :

[en] How can new players seeking to serve nonstandard worker categories (such as project-based workers) establish themselves into labour markets that are highly institutionalized? This paper explores the case of SMart, a Belgian community-based labour market intermediary that successfully developed solutions to better represent the interests of project-based workers and secure their discontinuous careers. Using an organizational legitimacy approach, we find that labour market entry and growth involve different types of boundary-crossing when addressing the needs of workers that do not fit into established categories. However, to justify boundary-crossing, the new player must complement its pragmatic work on delivering new services and tools with conceptual (cognitive) and structural (moral) legitimation work.

Research Center/Unit :

Laboratoire d'Etudes sur les Nouvelles Technologies de l'Information, la Communication, l'Innovation et le Changement - LENTIC
CES - Centre d'Économie Sociale - ULiège

Disciplines :

General management, entrepreneurship & organizational theory

Author, co-author :

Xhauflair, Virginie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège : UER > Social Investment and Philanthropy

Huybrechts, Benjamin ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège : UER > Management en économie sociale

Pichault, François ; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC Liège : UER > Gestion des ressources humaines

Language :

English

Title :

How can new players establish themselves in highly institutionalized labour markets? A Belgian case study in the area of project-based work

Publication date :

2018

Journal title :

British Journal of Industrial Relations

ISSN :

0007-1080

eISSN :

1467-8543

Publisher :

Blackwell Publishing

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

370-394

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Name of the research project :

ARC-Understanding flexicurity

Available on ORBi :

since 06 October 2017

Statistics

Number of views

863 (57 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

18 (11 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Adams, Z. and Deakin, S. (2014). ‘Institutional solutions to precariousness and inequality in labour markets’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 52 (4): 779–809.
Aldrich, H. E. and Fiol, C. M. (1994). ‘Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation’. Organization Studies, 19 (4): 645–70.
Arthur, M. B. and Rousseau, D. M. (eds.) (1996). The Boundaryless Career. A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. New York: Oxford University Press.
Azaïs, C. (2006). ‘Désegmentation du marché du travail et autonomie’. In S. Boutillier and D. Uzunidis (eds.), Travailler au XXIe siècle. Nouveaux modes d'organisation du travail. Brussels: De Boeck.
Benassi, C. and Dorigatti, L. (2015). ‘Straight to the core — explaining union responses to the casualization of work: the IG Metall campaign for agency workers’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 53 (3): 533–55.
Benner, C. (2003). ‘Labour flexibility and regional development: the role of labour market intermediaries’. Regional Studies, 37 (6–7): 621–33.
Bitektine, A. and Haack, P. (2015). ‘The macro and the micro of legitimacy: towards a multi-level theory of the legitimacy process’. Academy of Management Review, 40 (1): 49–75.
Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E. (2005). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.
Bonet, R., Cappelli, P. and Hamori, M. (2013). ‘Labor market intermediaries and the new paradigm for human resources’. The Academy of Management Annals, 7 (1): 341–92.
Burke, C. M. and Morley, M. J. (2016). ‘On temporary organizations: a review, synthesis and research agenda’. Human Relations, 69 (6): 1235–58.
Buschoff, K. S. and Schmidt, C. (2009). ‘Adapting labour law and social security to the needs of the “new self-employed” — comparing the UK, Germany and the Netherlands’. Journal of European Social Policy, 19 (2): 147–59.
Cappelli, P. and Keller, J. (2013). ‘Classifying work in the new economy’. Academy of Management Review, 38 (4): 575–96.
Davidov, G. (2004). ‘Joint employer status in triangular employment relationships’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42 (4): 727–46.
De Groof, S. and Vanhegen, M. (2016). ‘Equality, non-discrimination and work-life balance in Belgium’. IUSLabor, 2: 3–13.
de Peuter, G. (2011). ‘Creative economy and labor precarity: a contested convergence’. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 35 (4): 417–25.
Deephouse, D. L. and Suchman, M. C. (2008). ‘Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism’. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin and R. Suddaby (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Dekker, F. and van der Veen, R. (2017). ‘Modern working life: a blurring of the boundaries between secondary and primary labour markets?’. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 38 (2): 256–70.
Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic.
Goodrick, E. and Reay, T. (2010). ‘Florence Nightingale endures: legitimizing a new professional role identity’. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (1): 55–84.
Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R. and Suddaby, R. (2002). ‘Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields’. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (1): 58–80.
Greenwood, R. and Suddaby, R. (2006). ‘Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The Big Five accounting firms’. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (1): 27–48.
Gumbrell-McCormick, R. (2011). ‘European trade unions and “atypical” workers’. Industrial Relations Journal, 42(3): 293–310.
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B. and Grant, D. (2005). ‘Discourse and collaboration: the role of conversations and collective identity’. Organization Studies, 30 (1): 58–77.
Havard, C., Rorive, B. and Sobczak, A. (2009). ‘Client, employer and employee: mapping a complex triangulation’. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 15 (3): 257–76.
Heckscher, C. and Carré, F. (2006). ‘Strength in networks: employment rights organizations and the problem of co-ordination’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44 (4): 605–28.
Johns, T. and Gratton, L. (2013). ‘The third wave of virtual work’. Harvard Business Review, 91 (12): 66–73.
King, B. G. and Pearce, N. A. (2010). ‘The contentiousness of markets: politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets’. Annual Review of Sociology, 36 (1): 249–67.
Kornelakis, A. and Voskeritsian, H. (2016). ‘Getting together or breaking apart? Trade union strategies, restructuring and contingent workers in Southern Europe’. Economic and Industrial Democracy. doi: 10.1177/0143831X15627500.
Leighton, P. and Wynn, M. (2011). ‘Classifying employment relationships — more sliding doors or a better regulatory framework?’. Industrial Law Journal, 40 (1): 5–44.
Léonard, E. and Pichault, F. (2016). ‘Belgique: un “modèle” de concertation sociale?’ In D. Andofatto and S. Contrepois (eds.), Syndicalisme et Dialogue Social, Les Modèles Occidentaux à L’épreuve. Brussels: Peter Lang.
Levy, D. and Scully, M. (2007). ‘The institutional entrepreneur as modern prince: the strategic face of power in contested fields’. Organization Studies, 28 (7): 971–91.
Lindgren, M., Packendorff, J. and Sergi, V. (2014). ‘Thrilled by the discourse, suffering through the experience: emotions in project-based work’. Human Relations, 67 (11): 1383–412.
Lounsbury, M. and Crumley, E. T. (2007). ‘New practice creation: an institutional perspective on innovation’. Organization Studies, 28 (7): 993–1012.
Mair, J., Martí, I. and Ventresca, M. J. (2012). ‘Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: how intermediaries work institutional voids’. Academy of Management Journal, 55 (4): 819–50.
Malone, T. W., Laubacher, R. and Johns, T. (2011). ‘The big idea: the age of hyperspecialization’. Harvard Business Review, 89 (7–8): 56–65.
Malsch, B. and Gendron, Y. (2013). ‘Re-theorizing change: institutional experimentation and the struggle for domination in the field of public accounting’. Journal of Management Studies, 50 (5): 870–99.
Marsden, D. (2004). ‘The “network economy” and models of the employment contract’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42 (4): 659–84.
Marsden, D. (2008). “Project-based employment” and models of the employment contract’. In P. Ester, R. Muffels, J. Schippers and T. Wilthagen (eds.), Innovating European Labour Markets: Dynamics and Perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
McKendrick, D. G., Jaffee, J., Carroll, G. R. and Khessina, O. M. (2003). ‘In the bud? Disk array producers as a (possibly) emergent organizational form’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48 (1): 60–93.
Menger, P. -M. (1999). ‘Artistic labor markets and careers’. Annual Review of Sociology, 25 (1): 541–74.
Milkman, R. (2013). ‘Back to the future? US labour in the new gilded age’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51 (4): 645–65.
Mironi, M. (2010). ‘Reframing the representation debate: going beyond union and non-union options’. ILR Review, 63 (3): 367–83.
Montgomery, K. and Oliver, A. L. (2007). ‘A fresh look at how professions take shape: dual-directed networking dynamics and social boundaries’. Organization Studies, 28 (5): 661–87.
Navis, C. and Glynn, M. A. (2011). ‘Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility’. Organization Studies, 36 (3): 479–99.
OECD (2015). ‘Union Members and Employees’, https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=U_D_D’. 2016, 3 March.
Osnowitz, D. (2010). Freelancing Expertise: Contract Professionals in the New Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University/ILR Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pulignano, V., Meardi, G. and Doerflinger, N. (2015). ‘Trade unions and labour market dualisation: a comparison of policies and attitudes towards agency and migrant workers in Germany and Belgium’. Work, Employment and Society, 29 (5): 808–25.
Schmid, G. (2015). ‘Sharing risks of labour market transitions: towards a system of employment insurance’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 53 (1): 70–93.
Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P. C. (1985). ‘Community, market, state — and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order’. European Sociological Review, 1 (2): 119–38.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). ‘Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches’. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3): 571–610.
Sullivan, R. (2010). ‘Organizing workers in the space between unions: union-centric labor revitalization and the role of community-based organizations’. Critical Sociology, 36 (6): 793–819.
Tost, L. P. (2011). ‘An integrative model of legitimacy judgments’. Academy of Management Review, 36 (4): 686–710.
Überbacher, F. (2014). ‘Legitimation of new ventures: a review and research programme’. Journal of Management Studies, 51 (4): 667–98.
Van den Putte, L. and Orbie, J. (2015). ‘EU bilateral trade agreements and the surprising rise of labour provisions’. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 31 (3): 263–83.
Vinodrai, T. (2015). ‘Constructing the creative economy: design, intermediaries and institutions in Toronto and Copenhagen’. Regional Studies, 49 (3): 418–32.
Visser, J. (2013). ICTWSS: Database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts in 34 countries between 1960 and 2007. Amsterdam: Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
Wears, K. H. and Fisher, S. L. (2012). ‘Who is an employer in the triangular employment relationship? Sorting through the definitional confusion’. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 24 (3): 159–76.
Wynn, M. (2015). ‘Organising freelancers: a hard case or a new opportunity?’. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 13 (2): 93–102.
Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). ‘The categorical imperative: securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount’. American Journal of Sociology, 104 (5): 1398–438.