Household energy saving; Learning; Feedback; Residential consumption
Abstract :
[en] The abundant literature on consumer feedback shows that it is an efficient instrument for reducing household energy consumption. However, the reported reductions are strongly dependent on contextual factors and on the type of feedback provided. Given the importance of learning to this respect, this dimension constitutes the core focus of the present study which reports the findings of the TICELEC (i.e. French acronym for information technologies for responsible electricity consumption) project in France. The experiment included a control group (G1: the self-monitoring group) and one equipped group (G2). All participants reduced their consumption and learnt either directly from feedback or indirectly through self-monitoring. The amount of energy savings, which is larger than in similar experiments, can be explained by two factors. First, the specificity of our sample (i.e. high income, high consumption) which allows for potentially large energy savings. Second, high involvement of participants and the building of trust. The quantitative and qualitative dimensions of learning are then discussed. Additionally, we focus on peak-load shifting in G2 with 2 subgroups (G21 and G22). The higher proportion of shifters in G22 and the higher ‘quality’ of their shifting suggest a higher level of learning enabled by the more sophisticated feedback. Although this translated into only a moderately higher rate of energy savings, the higher degree of absorbed knowledge (i.e. through ‘learning by looking through connecting’) might lead to a qualitatively distinctive type of energy saving.
Disciplines :
Environmental sciences & ecology
Author, co-author :
Kendel, Adnane
Lazaric, Nathalie
Maréchal, Kevin ; Université de Liège > Agronomie, Bio-ingénierie et Chimie (AgroBioChem) > Modélisation et développement
Language :
English
Title :
What do people ‘learn by looking’ at direct feedback on their energy consumption? Results of a field study in Southern France
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., Rothengatter, T., The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors and behavioral antecedents. J. Environ. Psychol. 27 (2007), 265–276.
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households' direct and indirect energy use and savings?. J. Econ. Psychol. 30:5 (2009), 711–720.
Al-Ubaydli, O., List, J.A., On the Generalizability of Experimental Results in Economics. 2012, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, 17957.
Berker, T., “In the morning I just need a long, hot shower”: a sociological exploration of energy sensibilities in Norwegian bathrooms. Sustain.: Sci., Pract., Policy 9:1 (2013), 57–63.
Bertoldo, R., Poumadère, M., Rodriguez, L.C., When meters start to talk: the public's encounter smart meters in France. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 9 (2015), 146–156.
Bonino, D., Corno, F., De Russis, L., Home energy consumption feedback: a user survey. Energy Build. 47 (2012), 383–393.
Börner, D., Kalz, M., Specht, M., Beyond the channel: a literature review on ambient displays for learning. Comput. Educ. 60 (2013), 426–435.
Brandon, G., Lewis, A., Reducing household energy consumption: a qualitative and quantitative field study. J. Environ. Psychol. 19:1 (1999), 75–85.
Buensdorf, G., Cordes, C., Can sustainable consumption be learned? A model of cultural evolution. Ecol. Econ. 67:4 (2008), 646–657.
Buchanan, K., Russo, R., Anderson, B., The question of energy reduction: the problem(s) with feedback. Energy Policy 77 (2015), 89–96.
Burgess, J., Nye, M., Rematerialising energy use through transparent monitoring systems. Energy Policy 36 (2008), 4454–4459.
Carroll, E., Hatton, E., Brown, M., 2009. Residential Energy Use Behavior Change Pilot, Research study No. CMFS Project Code B21383, USA: Franklin Energy.
Chancel, L., Are younger generations higher carbon emitters than their elders? Inequalities, generations and CO2 emissions in France and in the USA. Ecol. Econ. 100 (2014), 195–207.
Clastres, C., Smart grids: another step towards competition, energy security and climate change objectives. Energy Policy 39 (2011), 5399–5408.
Darby, S., 2001. Making it obvious: designing feedback into energy consumption. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances and Lighting. Italian Association of Energy Economists/EC-SAVE programme, pp. 685–696.
Darby, S., The Effectiveness of Feedback on Energy Consumption, A Review for Defra of the Literature on Metering, Billing and Direct Displays. 2006, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, UK http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/energy/downloads/smart-metering-report.pdf.
Darby, S., Literature review for the Energy Demand Research Project. 2010, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, UK (Accessed 14 September 2015) https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/ofgem-publications/59113/sd-ofgem-literature-review-final-081210.pdf.
Denholm, P., Margolis, R.M., Evaluating the limits of solar photovoltaics (PV) in electric power systems utilizing energy storage and other enabling technologies. Energy Policy 35:5 (2007), 4424–4433.
Desmedt, J., Vekemans, G., Maes, D., Ensuring effectiveness of information to influence household behaviour. J. Clean. Prod. 17 (2009), 455–462.
Ehrhardt-Martinez, K., Donnelly, K.A., Laitner, J.A., Advanced Metering Initiatives and Residential Feedback Programs: a Meta-review for Household Electricity-saving Opportunities. 2010, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), USA.
Espey, J., Espey, M., Turning on the lights: a meta-analysis of residential electricity demand elasticities. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 36:1 (2004), 65–81.
Ek, K., Söderholm, P., The devil is in the details: household electricity saving behavior and the role of information. Energy Policy 38:3 (2010), 1578–1587.
EPRI, 2009. Residential Electricity Use Feedback: a Research Synthesis and Economic Framework. Electric Power Research Institute, Final report No. 1016844.
Faruqui, A., Sergici, S., Sharif, A., The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption- A survey of the experimental evidence. Energy 35:4 (2010), 1598–1608.
Frederiks, E.R., Stenner, K., Hobman, E.V., Household energy use: applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision-making and behaviour. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 41 (2015), 1385–1394.
Fischer, C., Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy?. Energy Effic. 1:1 (2008), 79–104.
Gandhi, R., Knittel, C.R., Pedro, P., Wolfram C., 2016. Running Randomized Field Experiments for Energy Efficiency Programs: a Practitioner's Guide, Draft.
Gangale, F., Mengolini, A., Oneyyi, I., Consumer engagement: an insight from smart grid projects in Europe. Energy Policy 60 (2013), 621–628.
Gram-Hanssen, K., Bech-Danielsen, C., House, home and identity from a consumption perspective. Hous., Theory Soc. 21 (2004), 17–26.
Gram-Hanssen, K., Existing buildings – users, renovations and energy policy. Renew. Energy 61 (2014), 136–140.
Hardy, M., Regression with Dummy Variables, Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-093. 1993, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., Burgess, J., Making energy visible: a qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors. Energy Policy 38:10 (2010), 6111–6119.
Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., Burgess, J., Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term. Energy Policy 52 (2013), 126–134.
Harrison, G.W., List, J.A., Field Experiments. J. Econ. Lit. 42:4 (2004), 1009–1055.
He, H.A., Greenberg, S., Huang, E.M., 2010. One size does not fit all: applying the transtheoretical model to energy feedback technology design. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Presented at the Human Factors in Computing Systems. Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp. 927–936.
Hutcheson, G.D., 2011. Ordinary least-squares regression. In: Moutinho, L., Hutcheson, G.D. (Eds.), The SAGE dictionary of quantitative management Research, pp. 224–228.
Imbens, G.W., Non parametric estimation of treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Rev. Econ. Stat. 86 (2004), 4–29.
Jonsson, D.K., Gustafsson, S., Wangel, J., Höjer, M., Lundqvist, P., Svane, O., Energy at your service: highlighting energy usage systems in the context of energy efficiency analysis. Energy Effic. 4:3 (2011), 355–369.
Karjalainen, S., Consumer preferences for feedback on household electricity consumption. Energy Build. 43:2–3 (2010), 458–467.
Karlin, B., Zinger, J.F., Ford, R., The effects of feedback on energy conservation: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 141:6 (2015), 1205–1227.
Kavousian, A., Rajagopal, R., Fischer, M., Determinants of residential electricity consumption: Using smart meter data to examine the effect of climate, building characteristics, appliance stock, and occupants' behavior. Energy 55 (2013), 184–194.
Krishnamurti, T., Davis, A., Wong-Parodi, G., Wang, J., Casey Canfield, C., Creating an in-home display: experimental evidence and guidelines for design. Appl. Energy 108 (2013), 448–458.
Laitner, J.A., Ehrhardt-Martinez, K., McKinney, V., 2009. Examining the scale of the behaviour energy efficiency continuum. In: ECEEE 2009 Summer Study: Act! Innovate! Deliver! Reducing Energy Demand Sustainably. La Colle sur Loup, France: European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
Lopes, M., Antunes, C., Martins, N., Energy behaviours as promoters of energy efficiency: a 21st century review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16 (2012), 4095–4104.
Lutzenhiser, L., Social and behavioural aspects of energy use. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 18 (1993), 247–289.
Maréchal, K., Not irrational but habitual: the importance of “behavioural lock-in” in energy consumption. Ecol. Econ. 69:5 (2010), 1104–1114.
Maréchal, K., Holzemer, L., Getting a (sustainable) grip on energy consumption: the importance of household dynamics and ‘habitual practices'. Energy Res. Social. Sci. 10 (2015), 228–239.
Martiskainen, M., 2007. Affecting Consumer Behaviour on Energy Demand. Final report to EdF Energy, UK: Sussex Energy Group – SPRU – Science and Technology Policy Research.
Martiskainen, M., Coburn, J., The role of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in household energy consumption-prospects for the UK. Energy Effic. 4:2 (2011), 209–221.
Martinsson, J., Lundqvist, L.J., Sundström, A., Energy saving in Swedish households. The (relative) importance of environmental attitudes. Energy Policy 39 (2011), 5182–5191.
McCalley, L.T., Cees, J., Midden, H., Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: the roles of goal setting and orientation. J. Econ. Psychol. 23 (2002), 589–603.
Ofgem, DECC, 2011. Energy Demand Research Project- Final Analysis. June 23rd. https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/ofgem-publications/59105/energy-demand-research-project-finalanalysis.pdf.
Parnell, R., Popovic Larsen, O., Informing the development of domestic energy efficiency initiatives: an everyday householder-centered framework. Environ. Behav. 37 (2005), 787–807.
Pasche, M., 2014. Soft Paternalism and Nudging – Critique of the Behavioral Foundations. MRPA Working Papers Jena, Germany.
Podgornik, A., Sucic, B., Blazic, B., Effects of customized consumption feedback on energy efficient behaviour in low-income households. J. Clean. Prod. 130 (2016), 25–34.
Poortinga, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., Wiersma, G., Household preferences for energy-saving measures: a conjoint analysis. J. Econ. Psychol. 24 (2003), 49–64.
Rubin, D.B., Assignment to treatment group on the basis of a covariate. J. Educ. Stat. 2 (1977), 1–26.
Schleich, J., Klobasa, M., Gölz, S., Brunner, M., Effects of feedback on residential electricity demand - Findings from a field trial in Austria. Energy Policy 61 (2013), 1097–1106.
Steg, L., Promoting household energy conservation. Energy Policy 36:12 (2008), 4449–4453.
Strengers, Y., Peak electricity demand and social practice theories: reframing the role of change agents in the energy sector. Energy Policy 44 (2012), 226–234.
Sweeney, J., Kresling, J., Webb, D., Soutar, G.N., Mazzarol, T., Energy saving behaviours: development of a practice-based model. Energy Policy 61 (2013), 371–381.
Torriti, J., Price-based demand side management: assessing the impacts of time-of-use tariffs on residential electricity demand and peak shifting in Northern Italy. Energy 44:1 (2012), 576–583.
Vassileva, I., Odlare, M., Wallin, F., Dahlquist, E., The impact of consumers' feedback preferences on domestic electricity consumption. Appl. Energy 93 (2012), 575–582.
Vassileva, I., Dahlquist, E., Wallin, F., Campillo, J., Energy consumption feedback devices' impact evaluation on domestic energy use. Appl. Energy 106 (2013), 314–320.
Vassileva, I., Campillo, J., Increasing energy efficiency in low-income households through targeting awareness and behavioral change. Renew. Energy 67 (2014), 59–63.
Veblen, T., 1899. The theory of leisure class. In: The Collected Works of Thorstein Veblen. Vol. 1, Routledge, London, 1994.
Verbong, G., Beemsterboer, S., Sengers, F., Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy. Energy Policy 52 (2013), 117–125.
Wilhite, H., Nakagami, H., Masuda, T., Yamaga, Y., Haneda, H., A cross-cultural analysis of household energy use behaviour in Japan and Norway. Energy Policy 24:9 (1996), 795–803.
Whitmarsh, L., Behavioural responses to climate change: asymmetry of intentions and impacts. J. Environ. Psychol. 29 (2009), 13–23.
Wood, G., Newborough, M., Influencing user behaviour with energy information display systems for intelligent homes. Int. J. Energy Res. 31 (2007), 56–78.
