Professional training; Technical and non-technical skills Simulator in augmented reality, Crew resource management (CRM); Simulator in augmented reality; Crew resource management (CRM)
Abstract :
[en] Radiation therapy (RT) is one of the cornerstones for the treatment of cancer. In most countries RT machines are handled by professionals benefitting from an ad hoc training in theoretical knowledge as well as technical and non-technical skills. In Belgium, RT departments are hiring in nurses for this activity. In countries where there is a specified core curriculum for basic training of radiation technologist, this basic training falls short once in practice and there is an
obvious requirement for a continuous updating of skills in order to keep up with the accelerating evolution of technology. Therefore, the decision has been taken to implement a simulator in augmented reality in the RT department in Liège, to face the double challenge i.e. basic professional training as well as continuous education in technical and nontechnical skills and Crew Resource Management. We describe a methodological approach to implement
this simulator in augmented reality.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
Servotte, Jean-Christophe ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Département des sciences de la santé publique
Guillaume, Michèle ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Epidémiologie nutritionnelle
BOGA, Deniz ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Service médical de radiothérapie
COUCKE, Philippe ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Service médical de radiothérapie
Language :
English
Title :
Methodological approach for the implementation of a simulator in augmented reality in a radiation therapy department
Grau C, Defourny N, Malicki J, Dunscombe P, Borras JM, Coffey M, et al. Radiotherapy equipment and departments in the European countries:final results from the ESTRO-HERO survey. Radiother Oncol 2014;112:155–64. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2014.08.029
CanMEDS. 2000. Canmeds 2000:extract from the CanMEDS 2000 project societal needs working group report. Med Teach 2000;22(6):549–54. doi:10.1080/01421590050175505
Coucke P, Boga D, Lenaerts E, Delgaudine M., From reporting incidents in a radiation therapy department to enterprise risk management (ERM) based on the European Foundation for quality management philosophy (EFQM). Int J Healthc Tech Manag 2014;7(2):127–31.
Phillips R, Ward JW, Page L, Grau C, Bojen A, Hall J, et al. Virtual reality training for radiotherapy becomes a reality. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008;132:366–71.
Freeth D, Hammick M, Reeves S, Koppel I, Barr H., Effective interprofessional education:development, delivery and evaluation. Oxford:Blackwell; 2005.
World Health Organization [Internet]. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. Geneva:World Health Organization; 2010. Available from:http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2010/WHO_HRH_HPN_10.3_eng.pdf
Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice:report of an expert panel. Washington, DC:Interprofessional Education Collaborative; 2011.
Groupe permanent d'experts en radioprotection médicale [Internet]. Rapport du Groupe de travail issu du Groupe permanent d'experts en radioprotection médicale. Recommandations du groupe de travail sur les conditions de mise en œuvre des « nouvelles techniques et pratiques » en radiothérapie. 2014:1–72.
Dekker SW, Hugh TB., Balancing “no blame” with accountability in patient safety. N Engl J Med 2010;362(3):275–6. doi:10.1056/NEJMc0910312
Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer D., There's no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing:a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment’. Simul Healthc 2006;1(1):49–55. doi:10.1097/01266021-200600110-00006
Decker S, Fey M, Sideras S, Caballero S, Rockstraw LR, Boese T, et al. Standards of best practice:simulation standard VI:the debriefing process. Clin Simul Nurs 2013;9(6S):S27–9.
Meakim C, Boese T, Decker S, Franklin AE, Gloe D, Lioce L, et al. Standards of best practice:simulation standard I:terminology. Clin Simul Nurs 2013;9(6S):S3–11. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.001
Gloe D, Sando CR, Franklin AE, Boese T, Decker S, Lioce L, et al. Standards of best practice:simulation standard II:professional integrity of participant(s). Clin Simul Nurs 2013;9(6S):S12–4. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.004
Lioce L, Reed CC, Lemon D, King MA, Martinez PA, Franklin AE, et al. Standards of best practice:simulation standard III:participant objectives. Clin Simul Nurs 2013;9(6S):S15–8. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.005
Franklin AE, Boese T, Gloe D, Lioce L, Decker S, Sando CR, et al. Standards of best practice:simulation standard IV:facilitation. Clin Simul Nurs 2013;9(6S):S19–21. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.011
Boese T, Cato M, Gonzalez L, Jones A, Kennedy K, Reese C, et al. Standards of best practice:simulation standard V:facilitator. Clin Simul Nurs 2013;9(6S):S22–5. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.010
Sando CR, Coggins RM, Meakim C, Franklin AE, Gloe D, Boese T, et al. Standards of best practice:simulation standard VII:participant assessment and evaluation. Clin Simul Nurs 2013;9(6S):S30–2. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.007
Lioce L, Meakim CH, Fey MK, Chmil JV, Mariani B, Alinier G., Standards of best practice:simulation standard IX:simulation design. Clin Simul Nurs 2015;11(6):309–15. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2015.03.005
Decker SI, Anderson M, Boese T, Epps C, McCarthy J, Motola I, et al. Standards of best practice:simulation standard VIII:simulation-enhanced interprofessional education (sim-IPE). Clin Simul Nurs 2015;11(6):293–7. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2015.03.010
Jeffries PR., A framework for designing implementing and evaluating simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nurs Educ Perspec 2005;26(2):96–103.
Alinier G., A typology of educationally focused medical simulation tools. Med Teach 2007;29:e243–50. doi:10.1080/01421590701551185
Dieckmann P, Gaba D, Rall M., Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simul Healthc 2007;2:183–93. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180f637f5
National League for Nursing Simulation Innovation Resource Center (NLN-SIRC). SIRC glossary 2013. Available from:http://sirc.nln.org/mod/glossary/view.php?id¼183
Hayden J., Use of simulation in nursing education:national survey results. J Nurs Regul 2010;1(3):52–7. doi:10.1016/S2155-8256(15)30335-5
Kardong-Edgren S, Willhaus J, Bennett D, Hayden J., Results of The National council of state boards of nursing national simulation survey:part II. Clin Simul Nurs 2012;8(4):e117–23. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2012.01.003
Adamson K., Integrating human patient simulation into associate degree nursing curricula:faculty experiences, barriers, and facilitators. Clin Simul Nurs 2010;6:e75–81. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2009.06.002
Jeffries PR, Rogers JR., Theoretical framework for simulation design. In:Jeffries PR, (ed.) Simulation in Nursing education:from conceptualization to evaluation. New York:National League for Nursing; 2012. p. 25–41.
Bartlett JL., A simulation template for a new simulation program. Clin Simul Nurs 2015;11(11), 479–81. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2015.09.003
Alinier G., Developing high-fidelity health care simulation scenarios:A guide for educators and professionals. Simul Gam 2011;42(1), 9–26. doi:10.1177/1046878109355683
National League for Nursing. Simulation design template adapted from Childs J, Sepples S, Chambers K. (2007). Template Available from:http://sirc.nln.org/course/view.php?id¼18
Eppich W, Cheng A., Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS) development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul Healthc 2015;10:106–15. doi:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000072
