Article (Scientific journals)
Asymmetrical international attitudes
Van Oudenhoven, J.; Askevis-Leherpeux, F.; Hannover, B. et al.
2002In European Journal of Social Psychology, 32 (2), p. 275-289
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
vanoudenhoven et al_ejsp_02.pdf
Publisher postprint (118.31 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] In general, attitudes towards nations have a fair amount of reciprocity: nations either like each other are relatively indifferent to each other or dislike each other Sometimes, however international attitudes are asymmetrical. In this study, we use social identity theory in order to explain asymmetrical attitudes. Parting from social identity theory, asymmetrical attitudes can be predicted to occur most likely between countries that are linguistically either similar or closely related, but differ in size. Europe, more than any other continent, offers a rich variety of nations which represent natural conditions for our study, such as size and degree of linguistic similarity. In order to test hypotheses derived from social identity theory, we asked respondents (N = 405) from (Dutch- and French-speaking) Belgium, France, Germany, and The Netherlands to fill out a questionnaire on three large nations (Germany, Great Britain, France) and three smaller ones (The Netherlands, Belgium, and Denmark). Results strongly supported hypotheses and confirm that a social identity approach may help to better understand international attitudes.
Disciplines :
Social, industrial & organizational psychology
Author, co-author :
Van Oudenhoven, J.
Askevis-Leherpeux, F.
Hannover, B.
Jaarsma, R.
Dardenne, Benoît ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cognitives > Psychologie sociale
Language :
English
Title :
Asymmetrical international attitudes
Publication date :
2002
Journal title :
European Journal of Social Psychology
ISSN :
0046-2772
eISSN :
1099-0992
Publisher :
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, W Sussex, United Kingdom
Volume :
32
Issue :
2
Pages :
275-289
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 01 September 2009

Statistics


Number of views
75 (5 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
193 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
24
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
22
OpenCitations
 
23

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi