Temps Modernes; Critique; Discourse Analysis; Marxism; Praxis Philosophy; Radical Imaginary; Antonio Gramsci; Cornelius Castoriadis
Abstract :
[en] On the basis of Antonio Gramsci’s praxis philosophy, taken up by André Tosel, and Cornelius
Castoriadis’ works on radical imaginary, this article analyses the debate about Marxism, during the year 1946, between two intellectual reviews: Les Temps Modernes and Critique. If the creation of those reviews is deeply related to a social context and an interdiscourse influenced by the political and ideological rise of extreme left – particularly the French Communist Party –, their project consists in a critical questioning of communist discourses, returning to Marx’s and Hegel’s texts. References to these philosophies induce different rhetorical and argumentative particularities that we intend to study in order to understand the complex relations between the rhetoric of a sociohistorical interdiscourse and his ideological substructure.
Disciplines :
Languages & linguistics
Author, co-author :
Franck, Thomas ; Université de Liège > Département de langues et littératures romanes > Sciences du langage - Rhétorique
Language :
French
Title :
La polémique marxiste comme pouvoir de praxis : le rôle des revues dans la radicalisation d'un imaginaire politique
Alternative titles :
[en] Marxist Controversy as Praxis : The Part of Reviews in the Radicalisation of political Imaginary
Publication date :
January 2017
Journal title :
Dacoromania Litteraria
ISSN :
2360-5189
Publisher :
Institutul de Lingvistică şi Istorie Literară, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Special issue title :
Uses of the Community. Collaborative Theories and Practices