[en] In order to assess the prevalence of pesticide contamination and the risk of florists’ exposure
when handling cut flowers, sampling and analysis of 90 bouquets of the most commonly sold cut
flowers in Belgium (50 bouquets of roses; 20 of gerberas, and 20 of chrysanthemums) were carried out. The bouquets were collected from 50 florists located in the seven largest cities of Belgium (Antwerp, Brussels, Charleroi, Ghent, Leuven, Liege, and Namur) and from five supermarkets located in the different regions. To have a better understanding of the route of exposure and professional practices a questionnaire was also addressed to a group of 25 florists who volunteered to take part in the survey. All florists were interviewed individually when collecting the questionnaire. The residual pesticide deposit values on cut flowers were determined in an accredited laboratory using a multi-residue (QuEChERS Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged Safe) method and a combination of gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chormatograhphy (LC) analysis. A total of 107 active substances were detected from all samples; i.e., an average of about 10 active substances per bouquet. The most
severely contaminated bouquet accumulated a total concentration of residues up to 97 mg/kg.
Results show that roses are the most contaminated cut flowers; with an average of 14 substances detected per sample and a total concentration per rose sample of 26 mg/kg. Some active substances present an acute toxicity (acephate, methiocarb, monocrotophos, methomyl, deltamethrin, etc.) and exposure can generate a direct effect on the nervous system of florists. Nevertheless, fungicides (dodemorph, propamocarb, and procymidone) were the most frequently detected in samples and had the highest maximum concentrations out of all the active substances analysed. Dodemorph was the most frequently detected substance with the highest maximum concentration (41.9 mg/kg) measured in the rose samples. It appears from the survey that, despite being exposed to high deposits of residues, florists usually do not protect themselves from contact with residues even if they spend several hours handling cut flowers and preparing bouquets (from 2 to 6 h/day, depending on the time of year and/or selling periods) daily. Bad habits (eating, drinking, or smoking at work) and absence of
personal protective equipment of most florists also increase the risk of contact with pesticide residues.
Palma, A.M.; Ward, R.W. Measuring demand factors influencing market penetration and buying frequency for flowers in the US. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 2010, 13, 1.
Rikken, M. Le Marché Européen des Fleurs et Plantes Équitables et Durables (The European market for Equitable and Sustainable Flowers and Plants). Available online: http://www.befair.be/sites/default/files/all-files/brochure/Le%20march%C3%A9%20europ%C3%A9en%20des%20fleurs%20et%20plantes%20%C3%A9quitables%20et%20dur%E2%80%A6_0.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2016).
Val’hor. Croissance & Perspectives du Marché de la Fleur Coupée en Europe, No. 44 (Growth and Prospects of the Cut Flower Market in Europe, in Search of Green, No. 44); En Quête de Vert: Paris, France, 2013; pp. 1-3.
Morse, D.L.; Baker, E.L.; Landrigan, P.J. Cut flowers: A potential pesticide hazard. Am. J. Public Health 1979, 69, 53-56.
Kendirli, B.; Çakmak, B. Economics of cut flower production in greenhouses: Case study from Turkey. Agric. J. 2007, 2, 499-502.
Illing, H.P.A. Is working in greenhouses healthy? Evidence concerning the toxic risks that might affect greenhouse workers. Occup. Med. 1997, 47, 281-293.
Das, R.; Steege, A.; Baron, S.; Beckman, J.; Harrison, R. Pesticide-related illness among migrant farm workers in the United States. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 2001, 7, 303-312.
Penagos, H.; Ruepert, C.; Partanen, T.; Wesseling, C. Pesticide patch test series for the assessment of allergic contact dermatitis among banana plantation workers in panama. Dermat. Contact Atop. Occup. Drug 2004, 15, 137-145.
Alavanja, M.C.; Hoppin, J.A.; Kamel, F. Health Effects of Chronic Pesticide Exposure: Cancer and Neurotoxicity* 3. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2004, 25, 155-197.
Lu, J.L. Risk factors to pesticide exposure and associated health symptoms among cut-flower farmers. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2005, 15, 161-170.
Wesseling, C.; De Joode, B.V.W.; Keifer, M.; London, L.; Mergler, D.; Stallones, L. Symptoms of psychological distress and suicidal ideation among banana workers with a history of poisoning by organophosphate or n-methyl carbamate pesticides. Occup. Environ. Med. 2010, 67, 778-784.
Baldi, I.; Gruber, A.; Rondeau, V.; Lebailly, P.; Brochard, P.; Fabrigoule, C. Neurobehavioral effects of long-term exposure to pesticides: Results from the 4-year follow-up of the PHYTONER Study. Occup. Environ. Med. 2011, 68, 108-115.
Alavanja, M.C.; Samanic, C.; Dosemeci, M.; Lubin, J.; Tarone, R.; Lynch, C.F.; Coble, J. Use of agricultural pesticides and prostate cancer risk in the Agricultural Health Study cohort. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003, 157, 800-814.
Bassil, K.L.; Vakil, C.; Sanborn, M.; Cole, D.C.; Kaur, J.S.; Kerr, K.J. Cancer health effects of pesticides Systematic review. Can. Fam. Physician 2007, 53, 1704-1711.
Abu, M.T. Adverse impact of insecticides on the health of Palestinian farm workers in the Gaza Strip: A hematologic biomarker study. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 2004, 11, 144-149.
Del Prado-Lu, J.L. Pesticide exposure, risk factors and health problems among cutflower farmers: A cross sectional study. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 2007, 2, 1.
Lacasaña, M.; López-Flores, I.; Rodríguez-Barranco, M.; Aguilar-Garduño, C.; Blanco-Muñoz, J.; Pérez-Méndez, O.; Cebrian, M.E. Association between organophosphate pesticides exposure and thyroid hormones in floriculture workers. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2010, 243, 19-26.
Gómez-Arroyo, S.; Díaz-Sánchez, Y.; Meneses-Pérez, M.A.; Villalobos-Pietrini, R.; de León-Rodríguez, J. Cytogenetic biomonitoring in a Mexican floriculture worker group exposed to pesticides. Mutat. Res. 2000, 466, 117-124.
Abell, A.; Ernst, E.; Bonde, J.P. Semen quality and sexual hormones in greenhouse workers. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2000, 26, 492-500.
Hanke, W.; Jurewicz, J. The risk of adverse reproductive and developmental disorders due to occupational pesticide exposure: An overview of current epidemiological evidence. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 2004, 17, 223-243.
Restrepo, M.; Munoz, N.; Day, N.E.; Parra, J.E.; de Romero, L.; Nguyen-Dinh, X. Prevalence of adverse reproductive outcomes in a population occupationally exposed to pesticides in Colombia. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 1990, 16, 232-238.
Restrepo, M.; Muñoz, N.; Day, N.; Hernandez, C.; Blettner, M.; Giraldo, A. Birth defects among children born to a population occupationally exposed to pesticides in Colombia. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 1990, 16, 239-246.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Guidance on the assessment of exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders in risk assessment for plant protection products. EFSA J. 2014, 12, 3874
Anastassiades, M.; Lehotay, S.J.; Štajnbaher, D.; Schenck, F.J. Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and “dispersive solid-phase extraction” for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J. AOAC Int. 2003, 86, 412-431.
AGP—List of Pesticides Evaluated by JMPS and JMPR. Available online: www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/thematic-sitemap/theme/pests/lpe/en/ (accessed on 20 June 2016).
FAO. FAO Specifications for Agricultural Pesticides in Agriculture. Available online: http://www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/thematic-sitemap/theme/pests/jmps/ps-new/en/ (accessed on 19 June 2016).
FAO. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper Series. JMPR Reports. Available online: www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/jmpr-reports/en/ (accessed on 20 June 2016).
WHO/FAO. Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR). Monographs & Evaluations. Available online on the International Programme on Chemical Safety website: www.inchem.org/pages/jmpr.html (accessed on 20 June 2016).
Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals andWorld Health Organization. WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2009; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
World Health Organization. The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2004; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
European Commission. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2009; p. 1355.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Scientific Opinion on Preparation of a Guidance Document on Pesticide Exposure Assessment for Workers, Operators, Bystanders and Residents. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1501.
EU—Pesticides Database. Available online: ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/public/?event=homepage&language=EN (accessed on 20 June 2016).
Agence Fédérale pour la Sécurité de la Chaîne Alimentaire (AFSCA). Faits et Chiffres. Rapport D’activité 2015; AFSCA: Brussels, Belgium, 2015; p. 96.