The Concept of Risk Assessment and Being Unfit for Surgery.

[en] The concept of risk assessment and the identification of surgical unfitness for vascular intervention is a particularly controversial issue today as the minimally invasive surgical population has increased not only in volume but also in complexity (comorbidity profile) and age, requiring an improved pre-operative selection and definition of high risk. A practical step by step (three steps, two points for each) approach for surgical risk assessment is suggested in this review. As a general rule, the identification of a "high risk" patient for vascular surgery follows a step by step process where the risk is clearly defined, quantified (when too "high"?), and thereby stratified based on the procedure, the patient, and the hospital, with the aid of predictive risk scores. However, there is no standardized, updated, and objective definition for surgical unfitness today. The major gap in the current literature on the definition of high risk in vascular patients explains the lack of sound validated predictive systems and limited generalizability of risk scores in vascular surgery. In addition, the concept of fitness is an evolving tool and many traditional high risk criteria and definitions are no longer valid. Given the preventive purpose of most vascular procedures performed in elderly asymptomatic patients, the decision to pursue or withhold surgery requires realistic estimates not only regarding individual peri-operative mortality, but also life expectancy, healthcare priorities, and the patient's primary goals, such as prolongation of life versus maintenance of independence or symptom relief. The overall "frailty" and geriatric risk burden, such as cognitive, functional, social, and nutritional status, are variables that should be also included in the analyses for stratification of surgical risk in elderly vascular patients.

Disciplines :

Surgery

Author, co-author :

Kolh, Philippe ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences biomédicales et précliniques > Biochimie et physiologie générales, humaines et path.

De Hert, S.

De Rango, P.

Language :

English

Title :

The Concept of Risk Assessment and Being Unfit for Surgery.

Publication date :

2016

Journal title :

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

ISSN :

1078-5884

eISSN :

1532-2165

Publisher :

W. B. Saunders Co., United Kingdom

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

857-66

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Commentary :

Available on ORBi :

since 11 July 2016

Statistics

Number of views

105 (1 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

200 (0 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

1 Goodney, P.P., Using risk models to improve patient selection for high risk vascular surgery. Scientifica (Cairo), 2012, 2012, 132370.
2 Mathis, M.R., Naughton, N.N., Shanks, A.M., Freundlich, R.E., Pannucci, C.J., Chu, Y., et al. Patient selection for day case-eligible surgery: identifying those at high risk for major complications. Anesthesiology 119 (2013), 1310–1321.
3 Richman, J.S., Hosokawa, P.W., Min, S.J., Tomeh, M.G., Neumayer, L., Campbell, D.A., et al. Toward prospective identification of high risk surgical patients. Am Surg 78 (2012), 755–760.
4 Pearse, R.M., Harrison, D.A., James, P., Watson, D., Hinds, C., Rhodes, A., et al. Identification and characterisation of the high risk surgical population in the United Kingdom. Crit Care, 10, 2006, R81.
5 Vaid, S., Bell, T., Grim, R., Ahuja, V., Predicting risk of death in general surgery patients on the basis of pre-operative variables using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. Perm J 16 (2012), 10–17.
6 Boyd, O., Jackson, N., How is risk defined in high risk surgical patient management?. Crit Care 9 (2005), 390–396.
7 Le Manach, Y., Collins, G.S., Ibanez, C., Goarin, J.P., Coriat, P., Gaudric, J., et al. Impact of peri-operative bleeding on the protective effect of β-blockers during infrarenal aortic reconstruction. Anesthesiology 117 (2012), 1203–1211.
8 Fleisher, L.A., Fleischmann, K.E., Auerbach, A.D., Barnason, S.A., Beckman, J.A., Bozkurt, B., et al. American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association. ACC/AHA guideline on peri-operative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 64 (2014), e77–137.
9 Kristensen, S.D., Knuuti, J., Saraste, A., Anker, S., Bøtker, H.E., De Hert, S., et al., Authors/Task Force Members. ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: the Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Eur Heart J 35 (2014), 2383–2431.
10 De Hert, S., Imberger, G., Carlisle, J., Diemunsch, P., Fritsch, G., Moppett, I., et al. Task force on pre-operative evaluation of the adult noncardiac surgery patient of the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Pre-operative evaluation of the adult patient undergoing non-cardiac surgery: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 28 (2011), 684–722.
11 Moonesinghe, S.R., Mythen, M.G., Das, P., Rowan, K.M., Grocott, M.P., Risk stratification tools for predicting morbidity and mortality in adult patients undergoing major surgery: qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology 119 (2013), 959–981.
12 Dalton, J.E., Kurz, A., Turan, A., Mascha, E.J., Sessler, D.I., Saager, L., Development and validation of a risk quantification index for 30 day post-operative mortality and morbidity in noncardiac surgical patients. Anesthesiology 114 (2011), 1336–1344.
13 Gupta, P.K., Gupta, H., Sundaram, A., Kaushik, M., Fang, X., Miller, W.J., et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery. Circulation 124 (2011), 381–387.
14 Longrois, D., Hoeft, A., De Hert, S., European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Anaesthesiology guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management. A short explanatory statement from the European Society of Anaesthesiology members who participated in the European Task Force. Eur J Anaesthesiol 31 (2014), 513–516.
15 Ambler, G.K., Gohel, M.S., Mitchell, D.C., Loftus, I.M., Boyle, J.R., Audit and Quality Improvement Committee of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland. The Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Statistically Corrected Operative Risk Evaluation (AAA SCORE) for predicting mortality after open and endovascular interventions. J Vasc Surg 61 (2015), 35–43.
16 Baas, A.F., Janssen, K.J., Prinssen, M., Buskens, E., Blankensteijn, J.D., The Glasgow aneurysm score as a tool to predict 30 day and 2-year mortality in the patients from the Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management trial. J Vasc Surg 47 (2008), 277–281.
17 Barnes, M., Boult, M., Maddern, G., Fitridge, R., A model to predict outcomes for endovascular aneurysm repair using pre-operative variables. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 35 (2008), 571–579.
18 Barnes, M., Boult, M., Thompson, M.M., Holt, P.J., Fitridge, R.A., Personalised predictions of endovascular aneurysm repair success rates: validating the ERA model with UK Vascular Institute data. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 40 (2010), 436–441.
19 Bertges, D.J., Goodney, P.P., Zhao, Y., Schanzer, A., Nolan, B.W., Likosky, D.S., et al., Vascular Study Group of New England. The Vascular Study Group of New England Cardiac Risk Index (VSG-CRI) predicts cardiac complications more accurately than the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in vascular surgery patients. J Vasc Surg 52 (2010), 674–683.
20 Biancari, F., Hobo, R., Juvonen, T., Glasgow aneurysm score predicts survival after endovascular stenting of abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients from the EUROSTAR registry. Br J Surg 93 (2006), 191–194.
21 Bush, R.L., Johnson, M.L., Hedayati, N., Henderson, W.G., Lin, P.H., Lumsden, A.B., Performance of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in high risk patients: results from the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Vasc Surg 45 (2007), 227–233.
22 Choke, E., Lee, K., McCarthy, M., Nasim, A., Naylor, A.R., Bown, M., et al. Risk models for mortality following elective open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a single institution experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 44 (2012), 549–554.
23 Faizer, R., DeRose, G., Lawlor, D.K., Harris, K.A., Forbes, T.L., Objective scoring systems of medical risk: a clinical tool for selecting patients for open or endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 45 (2007), 1102–1108.
24 Giles, K.A., Schermerhorn, M.L., O'Malley, A.J., Cotterill, P., Jhaveri, A., Pomposelli, F.B., et al. Risk prediction for peri-operative mortality of endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms using the Medicare population. J Vasc Surg 50 (2009), 256–262.
25 Grant, S.W., Hickey, G.L., Carlson, E.D., McCollum, C.N., Comparison of three contemporary risk scores for mortality following elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 48 (2014), 38–44.
26 Grant, S.W., Grayson, A.D., Mitchell, D.C., McCollum, C.N., Evaluation of five risk prediction models for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using the UK National Vascular Database. Br J Surg 99 (2012), 673–679.
27 Hadjianastassiou, V.G., Tekkis, P.P., Athanasiou, T., Muktadir, A., Young, J.D., Hands, L.J., External validity of a mortality prediction model in patients after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using multi-level methodology. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 34 (2007), 514–521.
28 Karthikesalingam, A., Vidal-Diez, A., De Bruin, J.L., Thompson, M.M., Hinchliffe, R.J., Loftus, I.M., et al. International validation of a risk score for complications and re-interventions after endovascular aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 102 (2015), 509–515.
29 Kertai, M.D., Steyerberg, E.W., Boersma, E., Bax, J.J., Vergouwe, Y., van Urk, H., et al. Validation of two risk models for peri-operative mortality in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Vasc Endovascular Surg 37 (2003), 13–21.
30 Legemate, D.A., Comments regarding ‘Personalised predictions of endovascular aneurysm repair success rates: validating the ERA model with UK Vascular Institute data’. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 40, 2010, 442.
31 Lim, S., Halandras, P.M., Park, T., Lee, Y., Crisostomo, P., Hershberger, R., et al. Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in high risk patients. J Vasc Surg 61 (2015), 862–868.
32 Moulakakis, K.G., Dalainas, I., Kakisis, J., Mylonas, S., Liapis, C.D., Endovascular treatment versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms: the influence of fitness in decision making. Int J Angiol 22 (2013), 9–12.
33 Patterson, B.O., Holt, P.J., Hinchliffe, R., Loftus, I.M., Thompson, M.M., Predicting risk in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review of current evidence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 36 (2008), 637–645.
34 Patterson, B.O., Holt, P.J., Hinchliffe, R., Nordon, I.M., Loftus, I.M., Thompson, M.M., Existing risk prediction methods for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair do not predict short-term outcome following endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 52 (2010), 25–30.
35 Prytherch, D.R., Sutton, G.L., Boyle, J.R., Portsmouth POSSUM models for abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg 88 (2001), 958–963.
36 Robinson, W.P., Huang, W., Rosen, A., Schanzer, A., Fang, H., Anderson, F.A., et al. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Inpatient Quality Indicator overall mortality rate does not accurately assess mortality risk after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 61 (2015), 44–49.
37 Samy, A.K., Murray, G., MacBain, G., Glasgow aneurysm score. Cardiovasc Surg 2 (1994), 41–44.
38 Wahlgren, C.M., Malmstedt, J., Swedish Vascular Registry. Outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair compared with open surgical repair in high risk patients: results from the Swedish Vascular Registry. J Vasc Surg 48 (2008), 1382–1388.
39 Wisniowski, B., Barnes, M., Jenkins, J., Boyne, N., Kruger, A., Walker, P.J., Predictors of outcome after elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and external validation of a risk prediction model. J Vasc Surg 54 (2011), 644–653.
40 Brown, L.C., Powell, J.T., Thompson, S.G., Epstein, D.M., Sculpher, M.J., Greenhalgh, R.M., The UK EndoVascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) trials: randomised trials of EVAR versus standard therapy. Health Technol Assess 16 (2012), 1–218.
41 United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators, Greenhalgh, R.M., Brown, L.C., Powell, J.T., Thompson, S.G., Epstein, D., Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm in patients physically ineligible for open repair. N Engl J Med 362 (2010), 1872–1880.
42 Egorova, N., Giacovelli, J.K., Gelijns, A., Greco, G., Moskowitz, A., McKinsey, J., et al. Defining high risk patients for endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 50 (2009), 1271–1279.
43 vanBeek, S.C., Reimerink, J.J., Vahl, A.C., Wisselink, W., Peters, R.J., Legemate, D.A., et al., the Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial Collaborators. External validation of models predicting survival after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 47 (2014), 593–602.
44 vanBeek, S.C., Vahl, A.C., Wisselink, W., Balm, R., on behalf of the Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial Collaborators. Fate of patients unwilling or unsuitable to undergo surgical intervention for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 49 (2015), 163–165.
45 Easterlin, M.C., Chang, D.C., Wilson, S.E., A practical index to predict 30 day mortality after major amputation. Ann Vasc Surg 27 (2013), 909–917.
46 Siracuse, J.J., Huang, Z.S., Gill, H.L., Parrack, I., Schneider, D.B., Connolly, P.H., et al. Defining risks and predicting adverse events after lower extremity bypass for critical limb ischemia. Vasc Health Risk Manag 10 (2014), 367–374.
47 Chung, J., Modrall, J.G., Valentine, R.J., The need for improved risk stratification in chronic critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 60 (2014), 1677–1685.
48 Meltzer, A.J., Graham, A., Connolly, P.H., Meltzer, E.C., Karwowski, J.K., Bush, H.L., et al. The Comprehensive Risk Assessment for Bypass (CRAB) facilitates efficient peri-operative risk assessment for patients with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 57 (2013), 1186–1195.
49 Biancari, F., Salenius, J.P., Heikkinen, M., Luther, M., Ylönen, K., Lepäntalo, M., et al. Risk-scoring method for prediction of 30 day post-operative outcome after infrainguinal surgical revascularization for critical lower-limb ischemia: a Finnvasc registry study. World J Surg 31 (2007), 217–225.
50 Conte, M.S., Bandyk, D.F., Clowes, A.W., Moneta, G.L., Namini, H., Seely, L., Risk factors, medical therapies and peri-operative events in limb salvage surgery: observations from the PREVENT III multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg 42 (2005), 456–464.
51 Schanzer, A., Mega, J., Meadows, J., Samson, R.H., Bandyk, D.F., Conte, M.S., Risk stratification in critical limb ischemia: derivation and validation of a model to predict amputation free survival using multicenter surgical outcomes data. J Vasc Surg 48 (2008), 1464–1471.
52 Schanzer, A., Goodney, P.P., Li, Y., Eslami, M., Cronenwett, J., Messina, L., et al. Validation of the PIII CLI risk score for the prediction of amputation free survival in patients undergoing infrainguinalautogenous vein bypass for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 50 (2009), 769–775.
53 Arvela, E., Söderström, M., Korhonen, M., Halmesmäki, K., Albäck, A., Lepäntalo, M., et al. Finnvasc score and modified Prevent III score predict long-term outcome after infrainguinal surgical and endovascular revascularization for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 52 (2010), 1218–1225.
54 Gupta, P.K., Ramanan, B., Lynch, T.G., Sundaram, A., MacTaggart, J.N., Gupta, H., et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of mortality after infrainguinal bypass. J Vasc Surg 56 (2012), 372–379.
55 Belmont, P.J. Jr., Davey, S., Orr, J.D., Ochoa, L.M., Bader, J.O., Schoenfeld, A.J., Risk factors for 30 day post-operative complications and mortality after below-knee amputation: a study of 2,911 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 213 (2011), 370–378.
56 Davenport, D.L., Ritchie, J.D., Xenos, E.S., Incidence and risk factors for 30 day postdischarge mortality in patients with vascular disease undergoing major lower extremity amputation. Ann Vasc Surg 26 (2012), 219–224.
57 Mayfield, J.A., Reiber, G.E., Maynard, C., Czerniecki, J.M., Caps, M.T., Sangeorzan, B.J., Survival following lower-limb amputation in a veteran population. J Rehabil Res Dev 38 (2001), 341–345.
58 Bates, B., Stineman, M.G., Reker, D.M., Kurichi, J.E., Kwong, P.L., Risk factors associated with mortality in veteran population following transtibial or transfemoral amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev 43 (2006), 917–928.
59 Feinglass, J., Pearce, W.H., Martin, G.J., Gibbs, J., Cowper, D., Sorensen, M., et al. Post-operative and late survival outcomes after major amputation: findings from the department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Surgery 130 (2001), 21–29.
60 Kirmani, B.H., Mazhar, K., Fabri, B.M., Pullan, D.M., Comparison of the EuroSCORE II and Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 risk tools. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44 (2013), 999–1005.
61 Nishida, T., Sonoda, H., Oishi, Y., Tanoue, Y., Nakashima, A., Shiokawa, Y., et al. The novel EuroSCORE II algorithm predicts the hospital mortality of thoracic aortic surgery in 461 consecutive Japanese patients better than both the original additive and logistic EuroSCORE algorithms. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 18 (2014), 446–450.
62 De Borst, G.J., Schermerhorn, M., Moll, F.L., Why the definition of high risk has been inappropriately used in previous carotid trials. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 56 (2015), 145–152.
63 Fokkema, M., Vrijenhoek, J.E., Den Ruijter, H.M., Groenwold, R.H., Schermerhorn, M.L., Bots, M.L., et al., TREAT CARE Study Group. Stenting versus endarterectomy for restenosis following prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Ann Surg 261 (2015), 598–604.
64 Brott, T.G., Hobson, R.W. 2nd, Howard, G., Roubin, G.S., Clark, W.M., Brooks, W., et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 363 (2010), 11–23.
65 Setacci, C., Chisci, E., Setacci, F., Iacoponi, F., de Donato, G., Rossi, A., Siena carotid artery stenting score: a risk modelling study for individual patients. Stroke 41 (2010), 1259–1265.
66 Gupta, P.K., Ramanan, B., Mactaggart, J.N., Sundaram, A., Fang, X., Gupta, H., et al. Risk index for predicting peri-operative stroke, myocardial infarction, or death risk in asymptomatic patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 57 (2013), 318–326.
67 Bennett, K.M., Scarborough, J.E., Shortell, C.K., Predictors of 30 day post-operative stroke or death after carotid endarterectomy using the 2012 carotid endarterectomy-targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Vasc Surg 61 (2015), 103–111.
68 Hawkins, B.M., Kennedy, K.F., Giri, J., Saltzman, A.J., Rosenfield, K., Drachman, D.E., et al. Pre procedural risk quantification for carotid stenting using the CAS score: a report from the NCDR CARE Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 60 (2012), 1617–1622.
69 Gates, L., Botta, R., Schlosser, F., Goodney, P., Fokkema, M., Schermerhorn, M., et al. Characteristics that define high risk in carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Study Group of New England. J Vasc Surg 62 (2015), 929–936.
70 Bouziane, Z., Nourissat, G., Duprey, A., Albertini, J.N., Favre, J.P., Barral, X., Carotid artery surgery: high risk patients or high risk centers?. Ann Vasc Surg 26 (2012), 790–796.
71 Wimmer, N.J., Spertus, J.A., Kennedy, K.F., Anderson, H.V., Curtis, J.P., Weintraub, W.S., et al. Clinical prediction model suitable for assessing hospital quality for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. J Am Heart Assoc, 3, 2014, e000728.
72 Hofmann, R., Niessner, A., Kypta, A., Steinwender, C., Kammler, J., Kerschner, K., et al. Risk score for periinterventional complications of carotid artery stenting. Stroke 37 (2006), 2557–2561.
73 Karthikesalingam, A., Holt, P.J., Vidal-Diez, A., Ozdemir, B.A., Poloniecki, J.D., Hinchliffe, R.J., et al. Mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: clinical lessons from a comparison of outcomes in England and the USA. Lancet 383 (2014), 963–969.
74 Parkinson, F., Ferguson, S., Lewis, P., Williams, I.M., Twine, C.P., South East Wales Vascular Network. Rupture rates of untreated large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients unfit for elective repair. J Vasc Surg 61 (2015), 1606–1612.
75 Western, C.E., Carlisle, J., McCarthy, R.J., Currie, I.C., Palliation of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the endovascular era. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 45 (2013), 37–43.
76 Oresanya, L.B., Lyons, W.L., Finlayson, E., Pre-operative assessment of the older patient: a narrative review. JAMA 311 (2014), 2110–2120.
77 Partridge, J.S., Harari, D., Martin, F.C., Dhesi, J.K., The impact of pre-operative comprehensive geriatric assessment on post-operative outcomes in older patients undergoing scheduled surgery: a systematic review. Anaesthesia 69:suppl 1 (2014), 8–16.
78 Kim, S.W., Han, H.S., Jung, H.W., Kim, K.I., Hwang, D.W., Kang, S.B., et al. Multidimensional frailty score for the prediction of post-operative mortality risk. JAMA Surg 149 (2014), 633–640.
79 Arya, S., Kim, S.I., Duwayri, Y., Brewster, L.P., Veeraswamy, R., Salam, A., et al. Frailty increases the risk of 30 day mortality, morbidity, and failure to rescue after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair independent of age and comorbidities. J Vasc Surg 61 (2015), 324–331.
80 Karam, J., Tsiouris, A., Shepard, A., Velanovich, V., Rubinfeld, I., Simplified frailty index to predict adverse outcomes and mortality in vascular surgery patients. Ann Vasc Surg 27 (2013), 904–908.
81 Melin, A.A., Schmid, K.K., Lynch, T.G., Pipinos II, Kappes, S., Longo, G.M., et al. Pre-operative frailty Risk Analysis Index to stratify patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 61 (2015), 683–689.