Ablin, E. and S. Paz (2000). Productos transgénicos y exportaciones agrícolas: Reflexiones en torno de un dilema argentino. Buenos Aires: Cancillería Argentina.
Adams, J. (2012). ‘Collaborations: The rise of research networks’. Nature, 490: 335-336.
Adams, J. (2013). ‘Collaborations: The fourth age of research’. Nature, 497: 557-560.
Anderson, W. (2002). ‘Postcolonial technoscience’. Social Studies of Science, 32: 643-658.
Anderson, W. and Adams, V. (2007). ‘Pramoedya’s chickens: Postcolonial studies of technoscience’, in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed., eds. Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wacjman, 181-204. Cambrige, MA: MIT Press.
Basalla, G. (1967). ‘The spread of Western science. A three-stage model describes the introduction of modern science into any non-European nation’. Science 156(3775): 611-22.
Callon, M. and Rabeharisoa, V. (2003). ‘Research “in the wild” and the shaping of new social identities’. Technology in Society 25: 193-204.
Cambrosio, A., Keating, P. and Mogoutov, A. (2004). ‘Mapping collaborative work and innovation in biomedicine: a computer-assisted analysis of antibody reagent workshops’. Social Studies of Science 34(3): 325-364.
CCE (2007). Commission des Communautés Européennes. Livre vert. ‘L’Espace européen de la recherche: nouvelles perspectives’. Brussels, April 4, 2007. COM (2007) 161 final.
Chase-Dunn, C. and Hall, T. (1997). Rise and Demise: Comparing World-Systems. Boulder: Westview Press.
Chakanetsa Mavhunga, C. and H. Trischler (2014). Energy (and) Colonialism, Energy (In)Dependence. Rachel Cansel Center Perspectives.
Collins, H. and Evans, R. (2008). Rethinking Expertise. University of Chicago Press.
Dagnino, R. (2009). A construção do Espaço Ibero-americano do Conhecimento, os estudos sobre ciência, tecnologia e sociedade e a política científica e tecnológica. Rev. iberoam. cienc. tecnol. soc. v.4.
Delvenne, P. and Thoreau, F. (2012). ‘Beyond the charmed circle of OECD. New Directions for Studies of National Innovation Systems’. Minerva 50-2: 205-219.
Delvenne, P. and Hendrickx, K. (2013). ‘The multifaceted struggle for power in the bioeconomy’. Technology in Society 35(2): 75-8.
Delvenne, P. and Vasen, F. (2013). Lo que los Sistemas Nacionales de Innovación no miran. Una crítica constructiva de las políticas de ciencia y tecnología a partir del ‘modelo de la soja transgénica’. In F. Tula Molina, Fernando; Vara, Ana Maria (eds.) Riesgo, política y alternativas tecnológicas. Entre la regulación y la discusión pública. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
Delvenne, P., Vasen, F. and Vara, A.-M. (2013). ‘The “soy-ization” of Argentina: dynamics of the “globalized” privatization regime in a peripheral context’. Technology in Society 35(2): 153-162.
Etzkowitz H. and L. Leydesdorff, (2000). ‘The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations’. Research Policy 29: 109-23.
Filomeno, F. (2013). ‘State capacity and intellectual property regimes: lessons from South American soybean agriculture’. Technology in Society 35(2): 139-152.
Gaillard, J. F. (1998). ‘Donors “models” for strengthening research capacity building in developing countries’. In M. J. Garrett and C. G. Granqvist (Eds.), Basic Sciences and Development: Rethinking Donor Policy, 81-126. Aldershot: Avebury Press.
Glänzel, W., K. Debackere, and M. Meyer (2008). ‘Triad or Tetrad? On global changes in a dynamic world’. Scientometrics 74 (1).
Goulet, F. (2008). Des tensions épistémiques et professionnelles en agriculture. Dynamiques autour des techniques sans labour et de leur évaluation environnementale. Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances 2(4): 291-310.
Gras, C. and V. Hernandez (2014). ‘Agribusiness and large-scale farming: capitalist globalisation in Argentine agriculture’. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement 35(3): 339-357.
Grauwin, S. et al. (2012). ‘Complex systems science: Dreams of universality, interdisciplinarity reality’. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(7): 1327-1338.
Grossetti, M., Eckert, D., Gingras, Y., Jegou L., Lariviere V., and Milard B. (2012). ‘The geographical deconcentration of scientific activities (1987-2007)'. 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI), 5-8 September, Montréal.
Hall, T. (2000). A World-Systems Reader: New Perspectives on Gender, Urbanism, Cultures, Indigenous Peoples and Ecology. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Harding, S. (2011). The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader. Chapel Hill, Duke University Press.
Hayden, C. (2003). When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hecht, G. (2011). Entangled Geographies. Empire and Technopolitics in the Global Cold War. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hwang, K. (2008). ‘International Collaboration in Multilayered Center-Periphery in the Globalization of Science and Technology’. Science, Technology & Human Values, January 33: 101-133.
Jasanoff, S. (2004). ‘The idiom of co-production’. In: Jasanoff, S. States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. London, Routledge.
Joerges, B and Shinn, T. (2001). ‘A Fresh look at instrumentation. An introduction’. In Joerges, B. and Shinn, T. Instrumentation between Science, State and Industry. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook Nr. 22. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kloppenburg, R. (1988). First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Kreimer, Pablo (2006). ¿Dependientes o integrados? La ciencia latinoamericana y la división internacional del trabajo. Nomadas-CLACSO 24.
Kreimer, P. (2010). La recherche en Argentine: entre isolement et dépendance. Cahiers de la recherche sur l’éducation et les savoirs 9: 115-138.
Kreimer, P. (2012). Délocalisation des savoirs en Amérique latine: le rôle des réseaux scientifiques. Pouvoirs Locaux N° 94 III.
Kreimer, P. and Zukerfeld, M. (2014). La Explotación Cognitiva: Tensiones emergentes en la producción y uso social de conocimientos científicos, tradicionales, informacionales y laborales, in Kreimer, Vessuri et al: Perspectivas Latinoamericanas en el estudio social de la ciencia y la tecnología. México, Siglo XXI.
Kreimer, P. and Levin, L. (2013). ‘Scientific cooperation between the European Union and Latin American countries: framework programmes 6 and 7', in J. Gaillard and R. Arvanitis, eds. Research Collaborations between Europe and Latin America Mapping and Understanding Partnership. Paris: Éditions des archives contemporaines: 79-104.
Latour, B. (1999). Politiques de la Nature. Comment Faire Entrer les Sciences en Démocratie, Paris, La Découverte.
Lave, R., Mirowski, P., and S. Randalls (2010). ‘Introduction: STS and neoliberal science’. Social Studies of Science 40(5): 659-675.
Lave, R. (2012). ‘Neoliberalism and the production of environmental knowledge’. Environement and Society 3 (1).
Levin, L., Jensen, P., and Kreimer, P. (2016). ‘Does size matter? The multipolar international landscape of nanoscience’. PLOS One 11(12): e0166914. doi: 10.1371.
Losego, P. and R. Arvanitis (2008). La science dans les pays non hégémoniques. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 2 (3), 334-342.
MacLeod, R. (1980). ‘On visiting the “moving metropolis”: reflections on the architecture of imperial science’. Historical Records of Australian Science 5(3): 1-16.
May, R.-M. (1997). ‘The scientific wealth of nations’. Science Technology & Society, 275: 793-796.
Medina, E. (2011). Cybernetic Revolutionaries. Technology and Politics in Allende’s Chile. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mirowski, P. and Sent, E.-M. (2008). ‘The commercialization of science and the response of STS’, in E.J. Hackett et al. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edition. Cambridge: MIT Press, 635-689.
Moya-Anegón, F. and V. Herrero-Solana (2013). ‘Worldwide topology of the scientific subject profile: a macro approach in the country level’. PLOS ONE, 8(12).
Mustar, P. and P. Larédo (2002). ‘Innovation and research policy in France (1980-2000) or the disappearance of the Colbertist state’. Research Policy 31: 55-72.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and M. Gibbons (2001). Re-Thinking Science. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Pestre, D. (2003). ‘Regimes of knowledge production in society: towards a more political and social reading’. Minerva 41(3): 245-261.
Quijano, A. (2000). ‘Coloniality of power and eurocentrism in Latin America’. International Sociology 15(2): 215-232.
RICYT (2015). El Estado de la ciencia. Principales indicadores de la ciencia. Iberaomericanos/Interamericanos. Buenos Aires, RICYT.
Rosemann, A. (2014). ‘Multipolar technoscience: clinical science collaborations in a changing world system’. Doctoral thesis (PhD): University of Sussex.
Salomon, J.-J. (2006). Les Scientifiques. Entre Savoir et Pouvoir. Paris: Albin Michel.
Santander, S. (2014). ‘Competing Latin American regionalisms in a changing world’, in M., Telò (Ed.), European Union and New Regionalism. London: Ashgate: 187-200.
Slaughter, S. and G. Rhoades (2004). Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter, S. and G. Rhoades (1996) ‘The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21 (3), 303-39
Tsing, A.-L. (2005). Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tyfield, D. (2012), The Economics of Science: A Critical Realist Overview. London: Routledge.
Tyfield, D. and J. Urry (2009). ‘Cosmopolitan China? Lessons from international collaboration in lowcarbon innovation’. The British Journal of Sociology 60(4): 793-812.
Van Oudheusden, M., Charlier, N., Rosskamp, B., and P. Delvenne (2015). ‘Broadening, deepening, and governing innovation: Flemish technology assessment in historical and socio-political perspective’. Research Policy 44(10): 1877-1886.
Vara, A.-M. (2005). Argentina, GM Nation. Chances and Choices in Uncertain Times. Country Case. New York University Project on International GMO Regulatory Conflicts.
Veugelers, R. (2010). ‘Towards a multipolar science world: trends and impact’. Scientometrics 82(2): 439-456.
Wagner, C. (2009). The New Invisible College: Science for Development. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Modern World-System. Volume 1. Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallerstein, I. (2004). ‘World-system analysis’, in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems: Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO. George Modelski. Oxford: Eolss Publishers.
Wallerstein, I. (2006). Comprendre le Monde. Introduction à l’Analyse des Systèmes-Monde. Paris: La Découverte.
Zhou, P. and Leydesdorff, L. (2006). ‘The emergence of China as a leading nation in science’. Research Policy 35(1): 83-104.
