E. H. Carr in What is History?, first published in 1961, Harmondsworth: Pelican Books, 1976, p. 22.
David Lodge, The Novelist at the Crossroads, London Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971, p. 33.
Bernard Bergonzi's, ‘Fictions of History’, in The Contemporary English Novel, eds. Malcolm Bradbury and David Palmer, Stratford-Upon-Avon-Studies 18, Edward Arnold, 1979, p. 45.
Angus Wilson's Anglo-Saxon Attitudes, 1956.
François Kèrel, Paris: Gallimard, 1984, p. 84.
Wilson Harris, Letter to Hena Maes-Jelinek, 7 November 1984.
Mikhail Bakhtine, Esthétique et th9orie du roman, translated from the Russian by Daria Olivier, Paris: Gallimard, 1978, p. 14.
Gay Clifford, The Transformations of Allegory, London Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974.
J. M. Coetzee, In the Heart of the Country, first published in 1977, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1983, p. 63.
“dialogue” a conversation in which her father peremptorily questions the black servant (p. 20).
Wilson Harris, The Womb of Space, Westport (U.S.A.): Greenwood Press, 1983, Introduction. p. 20.
Wilson Harris, Carnival, London. Faber and Faber, 1985.
Jane Wilkinson, Turin, 29 October 1985, Kunapipi, VIII, 2, 1987, p 32.
“Joseph” role in The Angel at the Gate, London: Faber and Faber, 1982.
E. M. Forster makes a similar point iAn Passage to India “The adept… may think, if he chooses, that he has been with God, but as soon as he thinks it, it becomes history, and falls under the rule of time” (Penguin edition, p. 283).
Russell McDougall, “Wilson Harris and the Art Cornval Revolution”, to be published in Commonwealth, Essays and Studies (Dijon).
John Thieme, “The World Turn Upside Down: Carnival Patterns in The Lonely Londoners”, Toronto South Asian Review, 5, 1, Summer 1986.
Mikhail Bakhtine, Esthétique et théorie du roman, p. 472.
Helen Tiffin, New Literature Review No. 7, p. 24.
‘In Memoriam 1948’, Kyk-Over-Al, 2, 7, December 1948, 6.
“Carnival of Psyche: Jean Rhys's Wide Sargasso Sea”, Explorations, Aarhus: Dangaroo Press, 1981, p. 132.
“Derrida is no ontologist loef néant because he is no ontologist”, After the New Criticism, London: Methuen, 1983, pp. 170-171.
