Paper published in a book (Scientific congresses and symposiums)
Comparison between homogeneous and heterogeneous field information for plastic material identification
Lecompte, D.; Sol, H.; Vantomme, J. et al.
2006In Grédiac, Michel; Huntley, Jonathan (Eds.) Proceedings of Photomecanics Conference 2006
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
2006_Comparison between homogeneous field information for plastic material identification_Lecompte_Photomeca.pdf
Author postprint (207.89 kB)
® 2007 American Institute of Physics
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
LIMARC
Abstract :
[en] The accuracy of a Finite Element Simulation for plastic deformation strongly depends on the chosen constitutive laws and the value of the material parameters within these laws. The identification of those mechanical parameters can be done based on homogeneous stress and strain fields such as those obtained in uniaxial tensile tests and simple shear tests performed in different plane material directions. Another way to identify plastic material parameters is by inverse modeling of an experiment exhibiting a heterogeneous stress and strain field. Experimental forces and strains are in this case compared to the simulated ones and it is tried to reduce the difference in a least-squares sense by optimizing the model parameters. The optimization technique used is this case is gradient based, which means that at every iteration a sensitivity calculation has to be performed in order to indicate the direction in which the parameters are to be identified. The basic principle of the inverse modeling procedure as it is used for parameter identification is the generation of a complex and heterogeneous deformation field that contains as much information as possible about the parameters to be identified. One way of obtaining such a non-homogeneous deformation is by altering the geometry of the specimen for a uniaxial test. Another possibility is to make the loading conditions more complex. In this paper both options are actually combined by using a biaxial tensile test on a perforated cruciform specimen. In the present paper, the work hardening of the material is assumed to be isotropic and it is described by a Swift law. The yield locus is modeled by the anisotropic Hill48 criterion. A comparison is made between the identification of the Hill48 parameters based on the one hand on the Lankford coefficients [1] and on the inverse modeling of a biaxial tensile test on the other hand
Disciplines :
Civil engineering
Author, co-author :
Lecompte, D.
Sol, H.
Vantomme, J.
Habraken, Anne  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département ArGEnCo > Département ArGEnCo
Language :
English
Title :
Comparison between homogeneous and heterogeneous field information for plastic material identification
Publication date :
2006
Event name :
Photomecanics 2006
Event place :
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Event date :
12 juillet 2006
Audience :
International
Main work title :
Proceedings of Photomecanics Conference 2006
Editor :
Grédiac, Michel
Huntley, Jonathan
Pages :
71-72
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Available on ORBi :
since 24 August 2009

Statistics


Number of views
171 (1 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
73 (1 by ULiège)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi