[en] In two (H15O)-O-2 PET scan experiments, we investigated the cerebral correlates of explicit and implicit knowledge in a serial reaction time (SRT) task. To do so, we used a novel application of the Process Dissociation Procedure, a behavioral paradigm that makes it possible to separately assess conscious and unconscious contributions to performance during a subsequent sequence generation task. To manipulate the extent to which the repeating sequential pattern was learned explicitly, we varied the pace of the choice reaction time task-a variable that is known to have differential effects on the extent to which sensitivity to sequence structure involves implicit or explicit knowledge. Results showed that activity in the striatum subtends the implicit component of performance during recollection of a learned sequence, whereas the anterior cingulate/mesial prefrontal cortex (ACC/MPFC) supports the explicit component. Most importantly, we found that the ACC/MPFC exerts control on the activity of the striatum during retrieval of the sequence after explicit learning, whereas the activity of these regions is uncoupled when learning had been essentially implicit. These data suggest that implicit learning processes can be successfully controlled by conscious knowledge when learning is essentially explicit. They also supply further evidence for a partial dissociation between the neural substrates supporting conscious and nonconscious components of performance during recollection of a learned sequence.
Destrebecqz, A. and Cleeremans, A. 2001. Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 8: 343-350.
_. 2003. Temporal factors in sequence learning. In Attention and implicit learning (ed. L. Jiménez), pp. 181-213. John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia.
Destrebecqz, A., Peigneux, P., Laureys, S., Degueldre, C., Del Fiore, G., Aerts, J., Luxen, A., van der Linden, M., Cleeremans, A., and Maquet, P. 2003. Cerebral correlates of explicit sequence learning. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 16: 391-398.
Erderlyi, M.H. 1986. Experimental indeterminacies in the dissociation paradigm of subliminal perception. Behav. Brain Sci. 9: 30-31.
Frackowiak, R.S.J., Friston, K.J., Frith, C.D., Dolan, R.J., and Mazziotta, J.C. 1997. Human brain function. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Friston, K.J., Buechel, C., Fink, G.R., Morris, J., Rolls, E., and Dolan, R.J. 1997. Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage 6: 218-229.
Goschke, T. 1997. Implicit learning and unconscious knowledge: Mental representation, computational mechanism, and brain structures. In Knowledge, concepts and categories (eds. K. Lambert and D. Shanks), Vol. 8, pp. 247-333. Psychology Press, London.
Grafton, S.T., Hazeltine, E., and Ivry, R. 1995. Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 7: 497-510.
Graybiel, A.M. 1998. The basal ganglia and chunking of action repertoires. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 70: 119-136.
Hazeltine, E., Grafton, S.T., and Ivry, R. 1997. Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding - A PET study. Brain 120: 123-140.
Honda, M., Deiber, M.P., Ibanez, V., Pascual-Leone, A., Zhuang, P., and Hallett, M. 1998. Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning. A PET study. Brain 121: 2159-2173.
Jacoby, L.L. 1991. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Mem. Lang. 30: 513-541.
Jiménez, L., Mendéz, C., and Cleeremans, A. 1996. Comparing direct and indirect measure of sequence learning. J. Exp. Psych. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 22: 948-969.
Keele, S.W., Ivry, R., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., and Heuer, H. 2003. The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychol. Rev. 110: 316-339.
Kitano, K., Okamoto, H., and Fukai, T. 2003. Time representing cortical activities: Two models inspired by prefrontal persistent activity. Biol. Cybern. 88: 387-394.
McLaughlin, J., Skaggs, H., Churchwell, J., and Powell, D.A. 2002. Medial prefrontal cortex and Pavlovian conditioning: Trace versus delay conditioning. Behav. Neurosci. 116: 37-47.
Merikle, P.M. and Reingold, E.M. 1991. Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory. J. Exp. Psych. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 17: 224-233.
Peigneux, P., Maquet, P., Meulemans, T., Destrebecqz, A., Laureys, S., Degueldre, C., Delfiore, G., Aerts, J., Luxen, A., Franck, G., et al. 2000. Striatum forever, despite sequence learning variability: A random effect analysis of PET data. Hum. Brain Mapp. 10: 179-194.
Perruchet, P. and Amorim, M.A. 1992. Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: Evidence against dissociation. J. Exp. Psych. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 18: 785-800.
Rabbitt, P. 2002. Consciousness is slower than you think. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 55: 1081-1092.
Rauch, S.L., Savage, C.R., Brown, H.D., Curran, T., Alpert, N.M., Kendrick, A., Fischman, A.J., and Kosslyn, S.M. 1995. A PET investigation of implicit and explicit sequence learning. Hum. Brain Mapp. 3: 271-286.
Rauch, S.L., Whalen, P.J., Savage, C.R., Curran, T., Kendrick, A., Brown, H.D., Bush, G., Breiter, H.C., and Rosen, B.R. 1997. Striatal recruitment during an implicit sequence learning task as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 5: 124-132.
Reed, J. and Johnson, P. 1994. Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 20: 585-594.
Reingold, E.M. and Merikle, P.M. 1988. Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness. Percept. Psychophys. 44: 563-575.
Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J.M., and Java, R.I. 1996. Memory: Task dissociations, process dissociations, and dissociation of consciousness. In Implicit cognition (ed. G. Underwood), pp. 85-158. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Runyan, J.D., Moore, A.N., and Dash, P.K. 2004. A role for prefrontal cortex in memory storage for trace fear conditioning. J. Neurosc. 24: 1288-1295.
Schendan, H.E., Searl, M.M., Melrose, R.J., and Stern, C.E. 2003. An fMRI study of the role of the medial temporal lobe in implicit and explicit sequence learning. Neuron 37: 1013-1025.
Shanks, D.R. and Johnstone, T. 1999. Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a serial reaction time task. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25: 1435-1451.
Shanks, D.R., Green, R.E.A., and Kolodny, J.A. 1994. A critical examination of the evidence for unconscious (implicit) learning. In Attention and performance XV (eds. C. Umiltà and M. Moscovitch), pp. 837-860. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Stadler, M.A. 1997. Distinguishing implicit and explicit learning. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 4: 56-62.
Thompson, R.F. and Krupa, D.J. 1994. Organization of memory traces in the mammalian brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17: 519-549.
Wallach, D. and Lebiere, C. 2003. Implicit and explicit learning in a unified architecture of cognition. In Attention and implicit learning (ed. L. Jiménez), pp. 215-250. John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia.
Wilkinson, L. and Shanks, D.R. 2004. Intentional control and implicit sequence learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30: 354-369.
Willingham, D.B. and Goedert-Eschmann, K. 1999. The relation between implicit and explicit learning: Evidence for parallel development. Psychol. Sci. 10: 531-534.
Willingham, D.B., Nissen, M.J., and Bullemer, P. 1989. On the development of procedural knowledge. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 15: 1047-1060.
Willingham, D.B., Greenberg, A.R., and Cannon Thomas, R. 1997. Response-to-stimulus interval does not affect implicit motor sequence learning, but does affect performance. Mem. Cogn. 25: 534-542.
Willingham, D.B., Salidis, J., and Gabrieli, J.D.E. 2002. Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 1451-1460.
Woodruff-Pak, D. and Steinmetz, A. 2002. Eyeblink classical conditioning. Volume 1: Applications in humans. Kluwer Academic Publisher, New York.
Woodruff-Pak, D.S., Lavond, D.G., and Thompson, R.F. 1985. Trace conditioning: Abolished by cerebellar nuclear lesions but not lateral cerebellar cortex aspirations. Brain Res. 348: 249-260.