soil heterogeneity; EMI; soil apparent conductivity; experimental design; power analysis
Abstract :
[en] In experimental trials, the success or failure of agricultural improvements is commonly evaluated on the agronomic response of crops, using proper experimental designs with sufficient statistical power. Since fine-scale variability of the experimental site can reduce statistical power, efficiency gains in the experimental design can be achieved if this variation is known and used to design blocking, or some proxy variable is used as a covariate. Near-surface geophysical techniques such as electromagnetic induction (EMI), which describes subsurface properties non-invasively by measuring soil apparent conductivity (ECa), may be one source of this information. The motivation of our study was to investigate the effectiveness of EMI-derived ECa measurements for planning and analysis of agricultural experiments. ECa and plant height measurements (the response variable) were taken from an agroforestry experiment in Western Thailand, and their variability was quantified to simulate multiple realizations of ECa and the residuals of the response variable from treatment means. These were combined to produce simulated data from different experimental designs and treatment effects. The simulated data were then used to evaluate the statistical power by detecting three orthogonal contrasts among the treatments in the original experiment. We considered three experimental designs, a simple random design (SR), a complete randomized block design (CRB), and a complete randomized block design with spatially adjusted blocks on plot means of ECa (CRBECa). Using analysis of variance (ANOVA), the smallest effect sizes could be detected with the CRBECa design, which indicates that ECa measurements could be used in the planning phase of an experiment to achieve efficiencies by improved blocking. In contrast, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) demonstrated that substantial power improvements could be gained when ECa was considered as a covariate in the analysis. We therefore recommend that ECa measurements should be used to characterize subsurface variability of experimental sites and to support the statistical analysis of agricultural experiments.
Disciplines :
Agriculture & agronomy
Author, co-author :
Rudolph, Sebastian
Wongleecharoen, Chalemchart
Lark, Murray
Marchant, Benjamin
Garré, Sarah ; Université de Liège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Echanges Eau-Sol-Plantes
Herbst, Michael
Vereecken, Harry
Weihermüller, Lutz
Language :
English
Title :
Soil apparent conductivity measurements for planning and analysis of agricultural experiments: A case study from Western-Thailand
Akondé T.P., Leihner D.E., Steinmüller N. Alley cropping on an ultisol in subhumid Benin. Part 1: long-term effect on maize, cassava and tree productivity. Agrofor. Syst. 1996, 34:1-12.
Baggett J.R., Kean D. Reduction of plant height by head smut infection in sweet corn cultivars. Hortscience 1989, 24(3):497-499.
Begna S.H., Hamilton R.I., Dwyer L.M., Stewart D.W., Cloutier D., Assemat L., Foroutan-Pour K., Smith D.L. Morphology and yield response to weed pressure by corn hybrids differing in canopy architecture. Eur. J. Agron. 2001, 14(4):293-302.
Chamshama S.A.O., Mugasha A.G. Growth and yield of maize alley cropped with Leucaena leucocephala and Faidherbia albida in Morogoro, Tanzania. Agrofor. Syst. 1998, 40:215-225.
Chamshama S.A.O., Mugasha A.G., Klovstad A., Haveraaen O., Maliondo S.M.S. Growth and yield of maize alley cropped with Leucaena leucocephala and Faidherbia albida in Morogoro, Tanzania. Agrofor. Syst. 1998, 40:215-225.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 1988, Routledge, New York. 2 ed.
Corwin D.L., Lesch S.M. Application of soil electrical conductivity to precision agriculture: theory, principles, and guidelines. Agron. J. 2003, 95:455-471.
Craswell E.T., Sajjapongse A., Howlett D.J.B., Dowling A.J. Agroforestry in the management of sloping lands in Asia and the Pacific. Agrofor. Syst. 1998, 38:121-137.
Deutsch C.V., Journel A.G. GSLIB-Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide 1992, Oxford University Press.
Doncaster C.P., Davey A.J.H. Choosing experimental designs. Analysis of Variance and Covariance: How to Choose and Construct Models for the Life Sciences 2007, 248-257. C.P. Doncaster, A.J.H. Davey (Eds.).
Eigenberg R.A., Nienaber J.A. Electromagnetic induction methods applied to an abandoned manure handling site to determine nutrient buildup. J. Environ. Qual. 2003, 32:1837-1843.
Garré S., Coteur I., Wongleecharoen C., Kongkaew T., Diels J., Vanderborght J. Noninvasive monitoring of soil water dynamics in mixed cropping systems: a case study in Ratchaburi Province, Thailand. Vadose Zone J. 2013, 12.
Garrity D.P. Sustainable land-use systems for sloping uplands in Southeast Asia. Technologies for Sustainable Agriculture in the Tropics 1993, 41-54. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America. J. Ragiand, R. Lal (Eds.).
Garrity D.P. Agroforestry and the achievement of the millennium development goals. Agrofor. Syst. 2004, 61-2(1):5-17.
Hussain K. Measuring and modelling resource use competition at the crop-soil-hedge interface on a hillside in Western Thailand 2015, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hohenheim, Hohenheim, Germany.
IUSS Working Group WRB World reference base for soil resources 2006, first update 2007. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103 2007, FAO, Rome.
Jama B.A., Nair P.K.R., Rao M.R. Productivity of hedgerow shrubs and maize under alleycropping and block planting systems in semiarid Kenya. Agrofor. Syst. 1995, 31:257-274.
Jaynes D.B., Colvin T.S., Ambuel J. Yield mapping by electromagnetic induction. Proceedings of the Second International Conference Madison, WI American Society of Agronomy, Crops Science Society of America, and Soils Science Society of America 1995, 383-394. American Society of Agronomy, Minneapolis. P.C. Robert, R.H. Rust, W.E. Larson (Eds.).
Kachanoski R.G., Gregorisch E.G., van Wesenbeeck I.J. Estimating spatial variations of soil water content using noncontacting electromagnetic inductive methods. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1988, 68:715-722.
Kitchen N.R., Drummond S.T., Lund E.D., Sudduth K.A., Buchleiter G.W. Soil electrical conductivity and topography related to yield for three contrasting soil-crop systems. Agron. J. 2003, 95:483-495.
Lal R. Agroforestry systems and soil surface management of a tropical alfisol. Agrofor. Syst. 1989, 8:1-6.
Lark R.M., Cullis B.R., Welham S.J. On spatial prediction of soil properties in the presence of a spatial trend: the empirical best linear unbiased predictor (E-BLUP) with REML. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2006, 57(6):787-799.
Lavoué F., van der Kruk J., Rings J., André F., Moghadas D., Huisman J.A., Lambot S., Weihermüller L., Vanderborght J., Vereecken H. Electromagnetic induction calibration using apparent electrical conductivity modelling based on electrical resistivity tomography. Near Surf. Geophys. 2010, 8(6):553-561.
Marchant B.P., Lark R.M. Estimation of linear models of coregionalization by residual maximum likelihood. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2007, 58(6):1506-1513.
Mead R. Designing experiments for agroforestry research. Biophysical Research for Asian Agroforestry 1991, 3-20. M.E. Avery, M.G.R. Cannell, C.K. Ong (Eds.).
Purakayastha T.J., Sinh B.R., Narwal R.P., Chhonkar P.K. Soil resources affecting food security and safety in South Asia. World Soil Resources and Food Security 2011, CRC Press. R. Lal, B.A. Stewart (Eds.).
R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, 1 2013, (Vienna).
Robinson D.A., Lebron I., Lesch S.M., Shouse P. Minimizing drift in electrical conductivity measurements in high temperature environments using the EM-38. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2004, 68:339-345.
Robinson D.A., Abdu H., Lebron I., Jones S.B. Imaging of hill-slope soil moisture wetting patterns in a semi-arid oak savanna catchment using time-lapse electromagnetic induction. J. Hydrol. 2012, 416-417:39-49.
Rudolph S., van der Kruk J., Von Hebel C., Ali M., Herbst M., Montzka C., Pätzold S., Robinson D.A., Vereecken H., Weihermuller L. Linking satellite derived LAI patterns with subsoil heterogeneity using large-scale ground-based electromagnetic induction measurements. Geoderma 2015, 241-242:262-271.
Saey T., Simpson D., Vermeersch H., Cockx L., Van Meirvenne M. Comparing the EM38DD and DUALEM-21S sensors for depth-to-clay mapping. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2009, 73(1):7-12.
Solie J.B., Raun W.R., Stone M.L. Submeter spatial variability of selected soil and bermudagrass production variables. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1999, 63:1724-1733.
Sudduth K.A., Drummond S.T., Kitchen N.R. Accuracy issues in electromagnetic induction sensing of soil electrical conductivity for precision agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2001, 31(3):239-264.