Patterns of genetic variation in the endangered European mink (Mustela lutreola L., 1761)

[en] Background: The European mink (Mustela lutreola, L. 1761) is a critically endangered mustelid, which inhabits several main river drainages in Europe. Here, we assess the genetic variation of existing populations of this species, including new sampling sites and additional molecular markers (newly developed microsatellite loci specific to European mink) as compared to previous studies. Probabilistic analyses were used to examine genetic structure within and between existing populations, and to infer phylogeographic processes and past demography. Results: According to both mitochondrial and nuclear microsatellite markers, Northeastern (Russia, Estonia and Belarus) and Southeastern (Romania) European populations showed the highest intraspecific diversity. In contrast, Western European (France and Spain) populations were the least polymorphic, featuring a unique mitochondrial DNA haplotype. The high differentiation values detected between Eastern and Western European populations could be the result of genetic drift in the latter due to population isolation and reduction. Genetic differences among populations were further supported by Bayesian clustering and two main groups were confirmed (Eastern vs. Western Europe) along with two contained subgroups at a more local scale (Northeastern vs. Southeastern Europe; France vs. Spain). Conclusions: Genetic data and performed analyses support a historical scenario of stable European mink populations, not affected by Quaternary climate oscillations in the Late Pleistocene, and posterior expansion events following river connections in both North- and Southeastern European populations. This suggests an eastern refuge during glacial maxima (as already proposed for boreal and continental species). In contrast, Western Europe was colonised more recently following either natural expansions or putative human introductions. Low levels of genetic diversity observed within each studied population suggest recent bottleneck events and stress the urgent need for conservation measures to counteract the demographic decline experienced by the European mink.

Disciplines :

Zoology

Author, co-author :

Cabria, Maite

Gonzalez, Elena

Gomez-Moliner, Benjamin

Michaux, Johan ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la vie > Génétique et physiologie des microalgues

Skumatov, Dimitri

Kranz, Andrea

Fournier, Pascal

Palazon, Santiago

Zardoya, Rafael

Language :

English

Title :

Patterns of genetic variation in the endangered European mink (Mustela lutreola L., 1761)

Publication date :

2015

Journal title :

BMC Evolutionary Biology

eISSN :

1471-2148

Publisher :

BioMed Central

Volume :

Pages :

141

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 06 January 2016

Statistics

Number of views

54 (3 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

108 (1 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Davison A, Griffiths HI, Brookes RC, Maran T, Macdonald DW, Sidorovich VE, et al. Mitochondrial DNA and palaeontological evidence for the origins of endangered European mink, Mustela lutreola. Animal Conservation. 2000;3(4):345-55.
Youngman PM. Distribution and systematics of the European Mink, Mustela lutreola Linnaeus, 1761. Acta Zool Fenn. 1982;166:1-48.
Wozencraft WC. Carnivore behavior, ecology and evolution. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press; 1989
Koepfli KP, Deere KA, Slater GJ, Begg C, Begg K, Grassman L, et al. Multigene phylogeny of the Mustelidae: resolving relationships, tempo and biogeographic history of a mammalian adaptive radiation. BMC Biol. 2008;6:10.
Lode T, Cormier JP, Le Jacques D. Decline in endangered species as an indication of anthropic pressures: the case of European mink Mustela lutreola Western population. Environ Manage. 2001;28(6):727-35.
Maran T. Conservation biology of the European mink, Mustela lutreola (Linnaeus 1761): decline and causes of extinction. Tallinn, Estonia: Tallinn University Dissertations on Natural Sciences; 2007
Rozhnov VV. Extinction of the European mink: ecological catastrophe or a natural process? Lutreola. 1993;1:10-6.
Sidorovich VE, Macdonald DW, Kruuk H, Krasko DA. Behavioural interactions between the naturalized American mink Mustela vison and the native riparian mustelids, NE Belarus, with implications for population changes. Small Carnivore Conservation. 2000;22:1-5.
Mustela lutreola. In: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2012.2.
Michaux JR, Hardy OJ, Justy F, Fournier P, Kranz A, Cabria M, et al. Conservation genetics and population history of the threatened European mink Mustela lutreola, with an emphasis on the west European population. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(8):2373-88.
Michaux JR, Libois R, Davison A, Chevret P, Rosoux R. Is the western population of the European mink, (Mustela lutreola), a distinct Management Unit for conservation? Biol Conserv. 2004;115(3):357-67.
Cabria MT, Gonzalez EG, Gómez-Moliner BJ, Zardoya R. Microsatellite markers for the endangered European mink (Mustela lutreola) and closely related mustelids. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7(6):1185-8.
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945-59.
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(8):2611-20.
Pella J, Masuda M. The Gibbs and split-merge sampler for population mixture analysis from genetic data with incomplete baselines. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2006;63:576-96.
Aguilar A, Jessup DA, Estes J, Garza JC. The distribution of nuclear genetic variation and historical demography of sea otters. Anim Conserv. 2008;11:35-45.
Frantz AC, Pope LC, Etherington TR, Wilson GJ, Burke T. Using isolation-by-distance-based approaches to assess the barrier effect of linear landscape elements on badger (Meles meles) dispersal. Mol Ecol. 2010;19(8):1663-74.
Larson S, Jameson R, Bodkin J, Staedler M, Bentzen P. Microsatellite DNA and mitochondrial DNA variation in remnant and translocated sea otter (Enhydra lutris) populations. J Mammal. 2002;83:893-906.
Lecis R, Ferrando A, Ruiz-Olmo J, Mañas S, Domingo-Roura X. Population genetic structure and distribution of introduced American mink (Mustela vison) in Spain, based on microsatellite variation. Conserv Genet. 2008;9:1149-61.
Marmi J, Lopez-Giraldez F, Macdonald DW, Calafell F, Zholnerovskaya E, Domingo-Roura X. Mitochondrial DNA reveals a strong phylogeographic structure in the badger across Eurasia. Mol Ecol. 2006;15(4):1007-20.
Mucci N, Arrendal J, Ansorge H, Bailey M, Bodner M, Delibes M, et al. Genetic diversity and landscape genetic structure of otter (Lutra lutra) populations in Europe. Conserv Genet. 2010;11:583-99.
Pertoldi C, Breyne P, Cabria MT, Halfmaerten D, Jansman HAH, Van Den Berge K, et al. Genetic structure of the European polecat (Mustela putorius) and its implication for conservation strategies. J Zool. 2006;270(1):102-15.
Wisely SM, Santymire RM, Livieri TM, Mueting SA, Howard JG. Genotypic and phenotypic consequences of reintroduction history in the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes). Conserv Genet. 2008;9:389-99.
Schmitt T. Molecular biogeography of Europe: Pleistocene cycles and postglacial trends. Front Zool. 2007;4:11.
Hewitt G. Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. Biol J Linn Soc. 1999;68:87-112.
Schmitt T, Varga Z. Extra-Mediterranean refugia: The rule and not the exception? Front Zool. 2012;9(1):22.
Stewart JR, Lister AM. Cryptic northern refugia and the origins of the modern biota. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001;16:608-13.
Lagercrantz U, Ryman N. Genetic structure of Norway spruce (Picea abies) concordance of morphological and allozymic variation. Evolution. 1990;44:38-53.
Babik W, Branicki W, Sandera M, Litvinchuk S, Borkin LJ, Irwin JT, et al. Mitochondrial phylogeography of the moor frog, Rana arvalis. Mol Ecol. 2004;13(6):1469-80.
Stauffer C, Lakatos F, Hewitt GM. Phylogeography and postglacial colonization routes of Ips typographus L. (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). Mol Ecol. 1999;8(5):763-73.
Sommer R, Benecke N. Late- and Post-Glacial history of the Mustelidae in Europe. Mammal Rev. 2004;34:249-84.
Simakova AN. The vegetation of the Russian Plain during the second part of the Late Pleistocene (33-18 ka). Quatern Int. 2006;149:110-4.
Velichko AA. The Pleistocene termination in Northern Eurasia. Quatern Int. 1995;28:105-11.
Hewitt G. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature. 2000;405(6789):907-13.
Palazón S, Ruiz-Olmo J. Preliminary data on the use of space and activity of the European mink (Mustela lutreola) as revealed by radio-tracking. Small Carnivore Conservation. 1993;8:6-8.
Carbonell R. Managing Spanish European mink populations: Moving from a precautionary approach towards knowledge-based management. J Nat Conserv. 2015;25:58-61.
Clavero M. Shifting Baselines and the Conservation of Non-Native Species. Conserv Biol. 2014;28(5):1434-6.
DÍEz-LeÓN M, Miranda R, Ariño AH, Galicia D. Setting priorities for existing conservation needs of crayfish and mink. Conserv Biol. 2015;29(2):599-601.
Edmands S. Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Mol Ecol. 2007;16(3):463-75.
O'Grady JJ, Brook BW, Reed DH, Ballou JD, Tonkyn DW, Frankham R. Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations. Biol Conserv. 2006;133:42-51.
Spielman D, Brook BW, Frankham R. Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(42):15261-4.
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Eldridge MDB, Lacy RC, Ralls K, Dudash MR, et al. Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conserv Biol. 2011;25:465-75.
Frankham R. Genetics and extinction. Biological Conservation. 2005;126:131-40.
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002
Spurgin LG, Richardson DS. How pathogens drive genetic diversity: MHC, mechanisms and misunderstandings. Proceedings Biological sciences / The Royal Society. 2010;277:979-88.
Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Rohl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16:37-48.
Cabria MT, Michaux JR, Gomez-Moliner BJ, Skumatov D, Maran T, Fournier P, et al. Bayesian analysis of hybridization and introgression between the endangered european mink (Mustela lutreola) and the polecat (Mustela putorius). Mol Ecol. 2011;20:1176-90.
Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947-8.
Fleming MA, Ostrander EA, Cook JA. Microsatellite markers for American mink (Mustela vison) and ermine (Mustela erminea). Mol Ecol. 1999;8:1352-4.
Nei M. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York, USA; 1987.
Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online. 2005;1:47-50.
Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989;123:585-95.
Fu YX. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997;147:915-25.
Ramos-Onsins S, Rozas J. Statistical properties of new neutrality tests against population growth. Mol Biol Evol. 2002;19:2092-100.
Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1451-2.
Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:1969-73.
Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 1985;22(2):160-74.
Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17:368-76.
Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003;52:696-704.
Posada D. JModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1253-6.
Martinkova N, McDonald RA, Searle JB. Stoats (Mustela erminea) provide evidence of natural overland colonization of Ireland. Proceedings Biological sciences / The Royal Society. 2007;274(1616):1387-93.
Macdonald DW, Sidorovich VE, Maran T, Kruuk H. The Darwin initiative. European mink, Mustela lutreola: analyses for conservation. 2002
Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992;131:479-91.
Rice WR. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution. 1989;43:223-5.
Swofford DL. PAUP∗: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (∗and other methods), version 4.0b 10. 2002
Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, Bollback JP. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science. 2001;294:2310-4.
Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology. 2012;3:539-42.
Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783-91.
Polzin T, Daneschmand SV. On Steiner trees and minimum spanning trees in hypergraphs. Oper Res Lett. 2003;31:12-20.
Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol. 2000;9:1657-9.
Nei M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 1978;89:583-90.
Goudet J. FSTAT (Version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered. 1995;86:485-6.
Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F. Genetix 4.02, Logiciel sous windows pour la gntique des populations. In: Montpellier (France): Laboratoire Genome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Universite de Montpellier II. 2000
Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered. 1995;86:248-9.
Guo SW, Thompson EA. Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics. 1992;48:361-72.
Weir BC, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 1984;38:1358-70.
Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via EM algorithm. J Roy Stat Soc B Met. 1977;39:1-38.
Chapuis MP, Estoup A. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:621-31.
Ryman N, Palm S. POWSIM: a computer program for assessing statistical power when testing for genetic differentiation. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2006;6:600-2.
Rosenberg NA. Distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes. 2004;4:137-8.
Dupanloup I, Schneider S, Excoffier L. A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Mol Ecol. 2002;11(12):2571-81.
Slatkin M. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics. 1995;139:457-62.
Goodman SJ. RST Calc: a collection of computer programs for calculating estimates of genetic differentiation from microsatellite data and determining their significance. Mol Ecol. 1997;6:881-5.
Cornuet JM, Santos F, Beaumont MA, Robert CP, Marin JM, Balding DJ, et al. Inferring population history with DIY ABC: a user-friendly approach to approximate Bayesian computation. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:2713-9.
Cornuet JM, Ravigne V, Estoup A. Inference on population history and model checking using DNA sequence and microsatellite data with the software DIYABC (v1.0). BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:401.
Estoup A, Lombaert E, Marin JM, Guillemaud T, Pudlo P, Robert CP, et al. Estimation of demo-genetic model probabilities with Approximate Bayesian Computation using linear discriminant analysis on summary statistics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2012;12(5):846-55.