heritage documentation; standards; accuracy requirements; quality control
Abstract :
[en] Photogrammetric documentation can provide a sound database for the needs of architectural heritage preservation. However, the major part of photogrammetric documentation production is not used for subsequent architectural heritage projects, due to lack of knowledge of photogrammetric documentation accuracy. In addition, there are only a few studies with rigorous analysis of the requirements for photogrammetric documentation of architectural heritage. In particular, requirements focusing on the geometry of the models generated by fully digital photogrammetric processes are missing. Considering these needs, this paper presents a procedure for architectural heritage documentation with photogrammetric techniques based on a previous review of existing standards of architectural heritage documentation. The data product specification proposed was elaborated conforming to ISO 19131 recommendations. We present the procedure with two case studies in the context of Brazilian architectural heritage documentation. Quality analysis of the produced models were performed considering ISO 19157 elements, such as positional accuracy, logical consistency and completeness, meeting the requirements. Our results confirm that the proposed requirements for photogrammetric documentation are viable.
Yilmaz, H.M.; Yakar, M.; Gulec, S.A.; Dulgerler, O.N. Importance of digital close-range photogrammetry in documentation of cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 2007, 8, 428-433.
International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS). International Charter for the Conservation and Restauration of Monuments and Sites (Venice Charter). In Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Architects and Technicians of Historic Monuments, Venice, Italy, 25-31 May 1964; p. 4.
Remondino, F. Heritage Recording and 3D Modeling with Photogrammetry and 3D scanning. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 1104-1138.
Nocerino, E.; Menna, F.; Remondino, F. Accuracy of typical photogrammetric network in cultural heritage 3D modeling. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2014, 1, 465-472.
Juran, J.M.; Godfrey, A.B.; Hoogstoel, R.E; Schilling, E.G. Juran's Quality Handbook, 5th ed.; McGraw-Hill Professional: New York, NY, USA, 1998.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Economic Benefits of Standard, 1st ed.; ISO: Geneve, Switzerland, 2004; p. 65.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 19131:2006 Data Production Specification; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006; p. 47.
International Committee of Architectural Photogrammetry (CIPA). Advice and Suggestions for the Furtherance of Optimum Practice in Architectural Photogrammetry Survey, 1st ed.; UNESCO: Paris, France, 1981; p. 100.
International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS). Principles for the Recording of Monuments, Group of Buildings and Sites. In Proceedings of the 11th ICOMOS General Assembly, Sofia, Bulgaria, 5-9 October 1996.
Patias, P.; Santana, M. Introduction to heritage documentation. In Cipa Heritage Documentation: Best Practices and Applications, 1st ed.; Stylianidis, E., Patias, P., Santana Quintero, M.; Eds.; CIPA (Ziti Publications): Thessaloniki, Greece, 2011; Volume 38, pp. 9-13.
Letellier, R.; Schimid, W.; LeBlanc, F. Recording, Documentation and Information Management for the Conservation of Heritage Places: Guiding Principles, 1st ed.; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2007; p. 174.
Remondino, F.; Rizzi, A. Reality-based 3D documentation of natural and cultural heritage sites-Techniques, problems, and examples. Appl. Geomat. 2010, 2, 85-100.
Anderson, J.M.; Mikhail, E.M. Surveying Theory and Practice, 7th ed.; McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math: New York, NY, USA, 1998; p. 1167.
Thompson, M.M.; Gruner, H. Manual of Photogrammetry, 4th ed.; ASPRS: Falls Church, VA, USA, 1980; p. 1150.
Spetsakis, M.; Aloimonos, J. A multi-frame approach to visual motion perception. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1991, 6, 245-255.
Petrie, G.; Toth, C.K. Terrestrial Laser Scanners. In Topographic Laser Ranging and Scanning, 1st ed.; Shan, J., Toth, C.K., Eds.; Taylor & Francis Group: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 87-126.
Lange, R.; Seitz, P. Solid-state time-of-flight range camera. IEEE J. Quantum. Electron. 2001, 37, 390-397.
Perenzoni, M.; Stoppa, D. Figure of metric for indirect Time-of-flight 3D cameras: Definition and experimental evaluation. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 2461-2472.
Valkenburg, R.J.; McIvor, A.M. Accurate 3D measurement using light system. Image Vis. Comput. 1998, 16, 99-110.
Reiss, M.L.L.; Tommaselli, A.M.G. A low-cost 3D reconstruction system using a single-shot projection of a pattern matrix. Photogramm. Rec. 2011, 26, 91-110.
Andrés, M.A.N.; Pozuelo, F.B. Evolution of the architectural and heritage representation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 91, 105-112.
Pieraccini, M.; Guidi, G.; Atzenni, C. 3D digitizing of cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 2001, 2, 63-70.
Pavlidis, G.; Koutsoudis, A.; Arnaoutoglou, F.; Tsioukas, V.; Chamzas, C. Methods for 3D digitization of cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 2007, 8, 93-98.
Sansoni, G.; Trebeschi, M.; Docchio, F. State-of-the-art and application of 3D Imaging Sensors in Industry, Cultural Heritage, Medicine and Criminal investigation. Sensors 2009, 9, 568-601.
Livieratos, E. Empiric, topographic or photogrammetric recording? Answers to properly phrased questions. In Proceedings of the Terrestrial Photogrammetry and Geographic Information Systems for the documentation of the National Cultural Heritage, Thessaloniki, Greece, 1992.
Grussenmeyer, P.; Landes, T.; Voegtle, T.; Ringle, K. Comparison methods of Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Photogrammetry and Tacheometry data for recording of cultural heritage buildings. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2008, 37, 213-218.
Giuliano, M.G. Cultural Heritage: An example of graphic documentation with automated photogrammetric systems. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2014, 40, 251-255.
Scherer, M.; Lerma, L. From the conventional total station to the prospective image assisted photogrammetric scanning total station: Comprehensive review. J. Survey. Eng. 2009, 135, 173-178.
Albertz, J. Albrecht Meydenbauer: Pioneer of photogrammetric documentation of the cultural heritage. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2001, 18, 19-25.
Dallas, R.W.A. Architectural and archaeological photogrammetry. In Close Range Photogrammetry and Machine Vision, 1st ed.; Athinson, K.B. Eds.; Whittles Publishing: Caithness, Scotland, 1996; pp. 283-303.
Fassi, F.; Fregonese, L.; Achermann, S.; De Troia, V. Comparison between laser scanning and automated 3D modelling techniques to reconstruct complex and extensive cultural heritage areas. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2013, 40, 73-80.
Boehler, W.; Marbs, A. 3D scanning and photogrammetry for heritage recording: a comparison. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Geoinformatics, Geospatial Information Research: Bridging the Pacific and Atlantic, Gävle, Sweden, 7-9 June 2004; pp. 291-298.
Yastikli, N. Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning. J. Cult. Herit. 2007, 8, 423-427.
Lerma, L.J.; Navarro, S.; Cabrelles, M.; Villaverde, V. Terrestrial laser scanning and close range photogrammetry for 3D archaeological documentation: The Upper Palaeolothic Cave of Parpalló as a case study. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2010, 37, 499-507.
Mateus, L.; Ferreira, V.; Barbosa, M. TLS and digital photogrammetry as tools for conservation assessment. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Heritage and Sustainable Development, Porto, Portugal, 19-22 June 2012.
Xu, Z.; Wu, L.; Shen, Y.; Li, F.; Wang, Q.; Wang, R. Tridimensional reconstruction applied to cultural heritage with the use of camera-equipped UAV and terrestrial laser scanner. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 10413-10434.
De Luca, L.; Veron, P.; Florenzano, M. Reverse engineering of architectural buildings based on a hybrid modeling approach. Comput. Graph. 2006, 30, 160-176.
Gomes, L.; Bellon, O.R.P.; Silva, L. 3D Reconstruction methods for digital preservation of cultural heritage: A survey. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2014, 50, 3-14.
Edelsbrunner, H. Shape reconstruction with Delaunay complex. In LATIN'98: Theoretical Informatics: 3rd Latin American Symposium Campinas, Brazil, April 20-24, 1998 Proceedings; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1998; pp. 119-132.
Vilbrandt, C.; Pasko, G. Cultural heritage preservation using constructive shape modeling. Comput. Graph. Forum 2004, 23, 25-41.
Saygi, G.; Agugiaro, G.; Hamamcioglu-Turan, M.; Remondino, F. Evaluation of GIS and BIM roles for the information management of historical buildings. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2013, 2, 283-288.
Müller, K.; Smolic, A.; Kaspar, B.; Merkle, P.; Rein, T.; Eisert, P.; Wiegand, T. 3D reconstruction of natural scenes with view-adaptive multi-texturing. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on IEEE 3D Data Processing, Visualization and Transmission, Thessaloniki, Greece, 6-9 September 2004; pp. 116-123.
Watt, A. 3D Computer Graphics, 3rd ed.; Pearson Education Limited: Harlow, UK, 2000; p. 569.
Denard, H. London Charter for the Computer-Based Visualisation of Cultural Heritage, 1st ed.; King's College London: London, UK, 2009; p. 13.
Waldhaeusl, P.; Ogleby, C. 3×3-Rules for Simple Photogrammetric documentation of Architecture Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 1994, 30, 426-429.
Buchanan, C.D. Photographing Historic Buildings for the Record, 1st ed.; HMSO: London, UK, 1983; pp. 154-196.
American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. ASPRS Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data; ASPRS: Bethesda, MD, USA; 2014; Volume 81, pp. A1-A26.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO/TC 211 Geographic information/Geomatics; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland; 1994.
Recording and Documentation Information Management (RecorDIM). Draft Report on: International Heritage Documentation Standards, 1st ed.; RecorDIM: London, UK, 2007; p. 25.
National Park Service. HABS/HAER/HALS Photography Guidelines, 2nd ed.; NPS: Washington, DC, USA, 2015; p. 306.
National Park Service. Recording Historic Structures and Sites with HABS Measured Drawings, 3rd ed.; NPS: Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
National Park Service. Recording Historic Structure, 2nd ed.; John Willey & Sons: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
Park Canada. Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, 2nd ed.; Park Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2010.
Bryan, P.G.; Blake, B.; Bedford, J. Metric Survey Specification for Cultural Heritage, 2nd ed.; English Heritage: London, UK, 2009; p. 111.
GIFLE (Grupo de Investigación en Fotogrametría y Láser Escáner). 12 Tips for Metric Photography of Architectural and Archeological Cultural Heritage to Extract 2D/3D/4D Measurements, 1st ed.; GIFLE: Valencia, Spain, 2014.
Instituto Andaluz del Patrimonio Histórico. Recomendaciones Técnicas Para la Documentación Geométrica de Entidade Patrimoniales, 1st ed.; Consejería de cultura: Andaluz, Spain, 2011; p. 23.
Gomide, J.H.; da Silva, P.R.; Braga, S.M.N. Manual de Elaboração de Projetos de Preservação do Patrimônio Cultural: Caderno 1, 1st ed.; Instituto do programa monumenta: Brasília, Brazil, 2005; p.76.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 19115:2003 Geographic Information-Metadata; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006; p.140.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 3166-1:1997 Country Code; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1997.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 19157:2011 Geographic Information-Data quality; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011; p.160.
Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT). NBR 6492-Representação de Projetos Arquitetura, 1st ed.; ABNT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1994.
Comissão Nacional de Cartografia (CONCAR). Perfil de Metadados Geoespacial do Brasil (Perfil MGB), 1st ed.; CONCAR: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009; p. 194.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 2859-1:1999 Sampling Procedures for Inspection by Attributes-Part 1; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999; p. 87.
Luhmann, T.; Robson, S.; Kyle, S.; Harley, I. Close Range Photogrammetry: Principle, Techniques and Applications, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; p. 510.
Chandler, J.H.; Fryer, J.G.; Jack, A. Metric capabilities of low-cost digital cameras for close range surface measurements. Photogramm. Rec. 2005, 20, 12-26.
Li, Z.; Liu, M. Research on decoding method of coded target in close-range photogrammetry. J. Comput. Syst. 2010, 6, 2699-2705.
Fraser, C. Automatic camera calibration in close-range photogrammetry. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2013, 79, 381-388.
Hahn, M. Automatic control point measurement. In Proceedings of the Photogrammetric Week'97, Heidelberg, Germany, 1997; pp. 115-126.
Barazzetti, L.; Scaioni, M.; Remondino, F. Orientation and 3D modeling from markerless terrestrial images: Combining accuracy with automation. Photogramm. Rec. 2010, 25, 356-381.
Tommaselli, A.M.G.; Bervegliere, A. Automatic Orientation of Multi-Scale Terrestrial Images for 3D Reconstruction. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 3020-3040.
Muñoz-Salinas, R. ARUCO: A minimal library for Augmented Reality applications based on OpenCv, 2012. Available online: http://www.uco.es/investiga/grupos/ava/node/26 (accessed on 20 June 2013).
Tommaselli, A.M.G.; Marcato, J., Jr.; Morais, M.V.A.; Silva, S.L.A.; Artero, A.O. Calibration of panoramic cameras with coded targets and 3D calibration field. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2014; 40, 137-142.
Brown, D.C. Close-Range Camera Calibration. Photogramm. Eng. 1971, 37, 855-866.
QGIS Project. QGIS User Guide 2.0, 2014. Available online: http://www.qgis.org/en/docs/index.html (Accessed on 28 August 2015).
Autodesk 123D Catch. Available online: http://www.123dapp.com/catch (accessed on 28 August 2015).
Santagati, C.; Inzerillo, L.; Di Paola, F. Image-based modeling techniques for architectural heritage 3D digitalization: Limits and potentialities. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2013; 40, 550-560.
Roncella, R.; Re, C.; Forlani, G. Performance evaluation of a structure and motion strategy in architectural and cultural heritage. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2011; 38, doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-5-W16-285-2011.
