Article (Périodiques scientifiques)
Are unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) the future of wildlife monitoring? A review of accomplishments and challenges
Linchant, Julie; Lisein, Jonathan; Semeki, Jean et al.
2015In Mammal Review, 45, p. 239-252
Peer reviewed vérifié par ORBi
 

Documents


Texte intégral
MAM_Linchant2015.pdf
Postprint Éditeur (324.54 kB)
Demander un accès

Tous les documents dans ORBi sont protégés par une licence d'utilisation.

Envoyer vers



Détails



Mots-clés :
detection; drone; remotely piloted aerial vehicles; survey; wildlife
Résumé :
[en] 1. Regular monitoring of animal populations must be established to ensure wildlife protection, especially when pressure on animals is high. The recent development of drones or unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) opens new opportunities. UASs have several advantages, including providing data at high spatial and temporal resolution, providing systematic, permanent data, having low operational costs and being low-risk for the operators. However, UASs have some constraints, such as short flight endurance. 2. We reviewed studies in which wildlife populations were monitored by using drones, described accomplishments to date and evaluated the range of possibilities UASs offer to provide new perspectives in future research. 3. We focused on four main topics: 1) the available systems and sensors; 2) the types of survey plan and detection possibilities; 3) contributions towards antipoaching surveillance; and 4) legislation and ethics. 4. We found that small fixed-wing UASs are most commonly used because these aircraft provide a viable compromise between price, logistics and flight endurance. The sensors are typically electro-optic or infrared cameras, but there is the potential to develop and test new sensors. 5. Despite various flight plan possibilities, mostly classical line transects have been employed, and it would be of great interest to test new methods to adapt to the limitations of UASs. Detection of many species is possible, but statistical approaches are unavailable if valid inventories of large mammals are the purpose. 6. Contributions of UASs to anti-poaching surveillance are not yet well documented in the scientific literature, but initial studies indicate that this approach could make important contributions to conservation in the next few years. 7. Finally, we conclude that one of the main factors impeding the use of UASs is legislation. Restrictions in the use of airspace prevent researchers from testing all possibilities, and adaptations to the relevant legislation will be necessary in future.
Disciplines :
Sciences de l’environnement & écologie
Auteur, co-auteur :
Linchant, Julie ;  Université de Liège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Gestion des ressources forestières et des milieux naturels
Lisein, Jonathan ;  Université de Liège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Gestion des ressources forestières et des milieux naturels
Semeki, Jean;  Université de Kinshasa > Faculté des Sciences Agronomiques
Lejeune, Philippe  ;  Université de Liège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Gestion des ressources forestières et des milieux naturels
Vermeulen, Cédric ;  Université de Liège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Laboratoire de Foresterie des régions trop. et subtropicales
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Are unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) the future of wildlife monitoring? A review of accomplishments and challenges
Date de publication/diffusion :
septembre 2015
Titre du périodique :
Mammal Review
ISSN :
0305-1838
eISSN :
1365-2907
Maison d'édition :
Wiley
Volume/Tome :
45
Pagination :
239-252
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed vérifié par ORBi
Disponible sur ORBi :
depuis le 27 août 2015

Statistiques


Nombre de vues
330 (dont 55 ULiège)
Nombre de téléchargements
31 (dont 21 ULiège)

citations Scopus®
 
423
citations Scopus®
sans auto-citations
412
OpenCitations
 
263
citations OpenAlex
 
458

Bibliographie


Publications similaires



Contacter ORBi