Angeler D.G., Viedma O., Sánchez-Carrillo S., Alvarez-Cobelas M. Conservation issues of temporary wetland Branchiopoda (Anostraca Notostraca: Crustacea) in a semiarid agricultural landscape: what spatial scales are relevant?. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141(5):1224-1234.
Antonson H., Åkerskog A. This is what we did last time uncertainty over landscape analysis and its procurement in the Swedish road planning process. Land Use Policy 2015, 42:48-57.
Antrop M. Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2000, 77(1-2):17-28.
Bastian O., Krönert R., Lipský Z. Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales - a challenge for landscape planning. Landsc. Ecol. 2006, 21(3):359-374.
Multifunctional landscapes: interdisciplinary approaches to landscape research and management. Conference Material for the Conference on "Multifunctional Landscapes" 2000, J. Brandt, B. Tress, G. Tress (Eds.).
Burel F., Baudry J. Écologie du Paysage. Concepts, Méthodes et Applications 1999, TEC & DOC, Paris.
Cañas I., Ayuga E., Ayuga F. A contribution to the assessment of scenic quality of landscapes based on preferences expressed by the public. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(4):1173-1181.
Carvalho-Ribeiro S., Loupa Ramos I., Madeira L., Barroso F., Menezes H., Pinto Correia T. Is land cover an important asset for addressing the subjective landscape dimension?. Land Use Policy 2013, 35:50-60.
Council of Europe The European Landscape Convention 2000, Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
Daniel T.C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 54:267-281.
Droeven E., Feltz C., Kummert M. Les territoires paysagers de Wallonie. La Conférence Permanente du Développement Territorial (CPDT), Etudes et Documents 4, Namur 2004.
Evans T.P., Ostrom E., Gibson C. Scaling issues with social data in integrated assessment modeling. Integr. Assess. 2002, 3(2-3):135-150.
Fairclough G. Large scale, long duration and broad perceptions: scale issues in historic landscape characterisation. Confronting Scale in Archaeology, Issues of Theory and Practice 2006, 203-215. Springer, New York. G. Lock, Molyneaux (Eds.).
Fry G., Tveit M.S., Ode A., Velarde M.D. The ecology of visual landscapes: exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators. Ecol. Indic. 2009, 9:933-947.
Gibson J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception 1979, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Gobster P.H. An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management. Landsc. J. 1999, 18(1):54-64.
Gobster P.H., Nassauer J.L., Daniel T.C., Fry G. The shared landscape: what aesthetics have to do with ecology?. Landsc. Ecol. 2007, 22:959-972.
Larrère C., Larrère R. Du bon usage de la nature pour une philosophie de l'environnement 2009, Flammarion, Paris.
Lausch A., Herzog F. Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability. Ecol. Indic. 2002, 2(1):3-15.
Mc Donald B. Working at a 'landscape scale'. Nat. Engl. 2011, gtgkm.org.uk/documents/brian-notes-1307721480.doc.
Meetenmeyer V., Box E.O. Scale effects in landscape studies. Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance Ecological Studies 1987, vol. 64:15-34.
Neuray G. Des paysages, pour qui? Pourquoi?. Comment? 1982, Presses universitaires de Gembloux, Gembloux.
Palmer J.F., Hoffman R.E. Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 54:149-161.
Pinto-Correira T., Machado C., Barroso F., Picchi P., Turpin N., Bousset J.P., Chabab N., Michelin Y. How do policy options modify landscape amenities? An assessment approach based on public expressed preferences. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 32:37-47.
Ramírez Á., Ayuga-Téllez E., Gallego E., Fuentes J.M., García A.I. A simplified model to assess landscape quality from rural roads in Spain. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 142(3):205-212.
Reason P., Bradbury H. The Sage Handbook of Action Research Participative Inquiry and Practice 2007, Sage, London. 2nd ed.
Schmitz S. Le paysage invisible. L'évaluation du paysage: une utopie nécessaire? 2004, 27-33. Publications de l'Université Paul Valéry, Montpellier. D. Puech, A. Honegger (Eds.).
Schmitz S., Vanderheyden V., Teleuca A., Partu-Stupariu I. Qu'entend-on par paysage de qualité? Résultats d'une enquête auprès d'experts roumains et wallons. Globalization and New Challenges of Agricultural and Rural Systems 2014, 35-45. Nagoya University Publisher, Nagoya. K. Doo-Chul, A. Maria Viegas Firmino, Y. Ichikawa (Eds.).
Schmitz S., Vanderheyden V., Vanden Broucke S., Loopmans M. The Shaping of social attitudes toward energy-parks in the Belgian countryside. Horiz. Geogr. 2012, 81:83-93.
Sevenant M., Antrop M. Cognitive attributes and aesthetic preferences in assessment and differentiation of landscapes. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90(9):2889-2899.
Shifley S.R., Thompson F.R., Dijak W.D., Fan Z. Forecasting landscape-scale, cumulative effects of forest management on vegetation and wildlife habitat: a case study of issues, limitations, and opportunities. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 254(3):474-483.
Styers D.M., Chappelka A.H., Marzen L.J., Somers G.L. Scale matters: indicators of ecological health along the urban-rural interface near Columbus, Georgia. Ecol. Indic. 2010, 10(2):224-233.
Sutton R.K. A model of human scale tested on rural landscape scenes. Great Plains Res. 2011, 21:215-230.
Swanwick C. Landscape Character Assessment: Guidance for England and Scotland: Prepared for the Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage by Carys Swanwick and Land Use Consultants 2002, The Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage, Cheltenham and Edinburgh.
Swanwick C. Society's attitudes to and preference for land and landscape. Land Use Policy 2009, 265:562-575.
Syrbe R.U., Walz U. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:80-88.
Tweit M., Ode A., Fry G. Key concept in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landsc. Res. 2006, 31(3):229-255.
Van Rompaey A., Schmitz S., Kesteloot C., Peeters K., Moens B., Van Hemelrijk H., Vanderheyden V., Loopmans M., Vanden Broucke S. Landscape capacity and social attitudes towards wind energy projects in Belgium. Final Report 2011, Belgian Science Policy, Brussels.
Vanderheyden V., Schmitz S. Belgian rural ordinary landscapes seen by Belgians. Reflection on Landscape Change: The European Perspective 2012, 88-89. PECSRL and Fryske Akademy, Leeuwarden. J. Van Der Vaart, H. Palang (Eds.).
Vanderheyden V., Van der Horst D., Van Rompaey A., Schmitz S. Perceiving the ordinary: a study of everyday landscapes in Belgium. Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Geogr. 2014, 115(5):591-603.
Weyland F., Laterra P. Recreation potential assessment at large spatial scales: a method based in the ecosystem services approach and landscape metrics. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 39:34-43.
