Communication soignant-soigné

Faymonville, Marie-Elisabeth; Nyssen, Anne-Sophie

doi:10.1007/s11724-014-0399-3

Request a copy

Article (Scientific journals)

Communication soignant-soigné

Faymonville, Marie-Elisabeth; Nyssen, Anne-Sophie

2014 • In Douleur et Analgésie

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/174654

DOI
10.1007/s11724-014-0399-3

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

doul&anal. commu.pdf

Publisher postprint (131.29 kB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

communication thérapeutique; suggestions placebo/nocebo

Abstract :

[fr] La communication fait partie intégrante de la relation de soin. Mais, quelle attention portons-nous aux mots que nous utilisons au quotidien dans nos interactions ? Dans cet article, nous n’avons pas la prétention de faire un exposé exhaustif sur la communication thérapeutique. Nous invitons le lecteur à observer un regard critique sur nos échanges verbaux et non verbaux. Nous montrons notamment comment les mots peuvent être porteurs de suggestions négatives et avoir un « effet nocebo » et comment l’apprentissage de compétences communicationnelles constitue un outil puissant permettant d’améliorer la qualité des soins et le bienêtre au travail

Disciplines :

Human health sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others

Author, co-author :

Faymonville, Marie-Elisabeth ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Médecine de la douleur : algologie et hypnose

Nyssen, Anne-Sophie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Départ. de Psychologies et Cliniques des Systèmes humains > Ergonomie et intervention au travail

Language :

French

Title :

Communication soignant-soigné

Alternative titles :

[en] Communication in Clinical Settings

Publication date :

2014

Journal title :

Douleur et Analgésie

ISSN :

1011-288X

eISSN :

1951-6398

Publisher :

Springer, Paris, France

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 04 December 2014

Statistics

Number of views

735 (93 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

65 (19 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Lussier MT, Richard C (2005) La structure et le contenu de l’entrevue médicale. La communication professionnelle en santé, Erpi, Québec, pp 191–230
Langewitz W, Denz M, Keller A, et al (2002) Spontaneous talking time at start of consultation in outpatient clinic: Cohort study. Br Med J 325:682–3
Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Beckman HB (2000) Patients, interrupted? J Fam Pract 49:471
White JW, Levinson W, Roter D (1994) Oh by the way.. The closing moments of the medical interview. J Gen Int Med 6:24–8
Cole SA, Bird J (2000) The medical interview. The three function approach. 2nd ed. Mosby Year Book, Saint-Louis (Missouri)
Miller FG, Colloca L (2011) The placebo phenomenon and medical ethics: rethinking the relationship between informed consent and risk-benefit assessment. Theor Med Bioeth 32:229–43
Häuser W, Hansen E, Enck P (2012) Nocebo Phenomena in Medicine. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 109:459–65
Lang EV, Hatsiopoulou O, Koch T, et al (2005) Can words hurt? Patient-provider interactions during invasive procedures. Pain 114:303–9
Krosnick JA, Bertz AL, Jussim LJ, Lynn AR (1992) Subliminal conditioning of attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18:152–62
Bayer TL, Coverdale JH, Chiang E, Bangs M (1998) The role of prior pain experience and expectancy in psychologically and physically induced pain. Pain 74:327–31
Zajonc RB (1980) Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist 35:151–75
Richter M, Eck J, Straube T, et al (2010) Do words hurt? Brain activation during processing of pain-related words. Pain 148:198–205
Hahn RA (1997) The nocebo phenomenon: concept, evidence, and implications for public health. Prevent Medicine 26:607–11
Kaptchuk T (1998) Powerful placebo: the dark side of the randomised trial. Lancet 351:1722–5
Singer T, Seymour B, O’Doherty J, et al (2004) Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain, Science 303:1157–62
Rosenthal R, Rubin DB (1978) Interpersonal expectancy effects: the first 345 studies. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:377–415
Varga K, Varga Z, Fritúz G (2013) Psychological support based on positive suggestions in the treatment of a critically ill ICU patient — A case report. Interventional Medicine & Applied Science 5:153–61
Colloca L, Miller FG (2011) The nocebo effect and its relevance for clinical practice. Psychosomatic medicine 73:598–603
Enck P, Benedetti F, Schedlowski M (2008) New insights into the placebo and nocebo responses. Neuron 59:195–206
Lang EV, Tan G, Amihai I, Jensen MP (2014) Analyzing acute procedural pain in clinical trials. Pain 155:1365–73
Watzlawick P (1980) Le langage du changement. Éléments de communication thérapeutique. Seuil, Paris
Watzlawick P, Helmick-Beavin J, Jackson D (1972) Une logique de communication. Seuil, Paris
Zeig JK (1988) La technique d’Erickson. Hommes & Groupes Éditeurs, Paris
Nyssen AS, Aunac S, Faymonville ME, Lutte I (2004) Reporting systems in healthcare from a case-by-case experience to a general framework: an example in anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 21:757–65
Nyssen AS, De Keyser V, Lamy M, et al (2005) Rapport de recherche: Développement d’un programme de signalement et d’analyse d’incidents/accidents en milieu médical. Programme d’appui scientifique à la protection des travailleurs en matière de santé (PS/12/21). Université de Liège, Liège https://portal.health.fgov.be
Nyssen AS, Hansez I, Baele P, et al (2003) Occupational stress and burnout in anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 90:333–7
Lazarus RS, Flokman S (1984) Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer, New York
Nyssen AS, Gillet A, Cayet AM, et al (2012) Systèmes de retour d’expérience: « Faut-il vraiment copier l’industrie? » Risques & Qualité 9:85–91