Article (Scientific journals)
Prodigality and Myopia - Two Rationales for Social Security
Possen, Uri; Pestieau, Pierre
2008In Manchester School, 76 (6), p. 629-652
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
PRODIGALITY AND MYOPIA—TWO RATIONALES FOR.pdf
Publisher postprint (176.19 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] Among the rationales for social security, there is the fact that some people have to be forced to save. To explain undersaving, rational prodigality and hyperbolic preferences are often cited but treated separably. In this paper we study those two particular behaviors that lead to forced saving within an optimal income tax second-best setting.
Research center :
CREPP - Centre de Recherche en Économie Publique et de la Population - ULiège
Disciplines :
Economic systems & public economics
Author, co-author :
Possen, Uri;  Cornell University
Pestieau, Pierre  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC-Ecole de gestion > HEC-Ecole de gestion
Language :
English
Title :
Prodigality and Myopia - Two Rationales for Social Security
Publication date :
2008
Journal title :
Manchester School
ISSN :
1463-6786
eISSN :
1467-9957
Publisher :
Blackwell Publishing
Volume :
76
Issue :
6
Pages :
629-652
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 21 April 2010

Statistics


Number of views
75 (3 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
1 (1 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
5
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
4
OpenCitations
 
5

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi