Poster (Scientific congresses and symposiums)
To Be Afraid or to Be Proud? The Impact of Emotional Valence and Response Efficacy on Persuasion in Anti-Drink Driving Advertising
Hazee, Simon
201342nd EMAC Conference
 

Files


Full Text
EMAC_poster.pdf
Author preprint (916.12 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Social marketing; Road safety advertising; Drink driving; Emotional valence; Response efficacy; Persuasive process
Abstract :
[en] Social marketers traditionally use negative emotions although they can be ineffective on persuasion. However, few social marketers use positive emotions while commercial marketers use them extensively. Accordingly, this study aims to understand the impact of positive versus negative emotional appeals on persuasion of young adults in a road safety context through a 2 (pride versus fear) × 2 (low versus high response efficacy) factorial design. ANCOVA results show the significant role of both types of emotions on persuasion, regardless the level of response efficacy. Surprisingly, “fear” is more persuasive than “pride”. Hence, social marketers should consider using emotions when building future models and communication campaigns targeting young adults. Future research should investigate under which conditions ‘pride’ can be the most persuasive.
Disciplines :
Marketing
Author, co-author :
Hazee, Simon ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC-Ecole de gestion : UER > UER Management
Language :
English
Title :
To Be Afraid or to Be Proud? The Impact of Emotional Valence and Response Efficacy on Persuasion in Anti-Drink Driving Advertising
Publication date :
June 2013
Event name :
42nd EMAC Conference
Event place :
Istanbul, Turkey
Event date :
4-7 June 2013
Audience :
International
Available on ORBi :
since 07 June 2013

Statistics


Number of views
148 (12 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
4 (3 by ULiège)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi