Towards Participatory Integrated Valuation and Modelling of Ecosystem Services under Land-use Change

[en] The lack of consideration for Ecosystem Services (ES) values in current decision-making is recognised as one of the main reasons leading to an intense competition and arguably unsustainable use of well-located available land. In this paper, we present a framework for the Valuation Of Terrestrial Ecosystem Services (VOTES), aiming at structuring a methodology that is applicable for valuing ES in a given area through a set of indicators that are both meaningful for local actors and scientifically constructed. Examples from a case study area in central Belgium are used to illustrate the methodology: a stepwise procedure starting with the valuation of ES at present. The valuation of the social, biophysical and economic dimensions of ES are based on current land-use patterns. Subsequently, scenarios of land-use change are used to explore potential losses (and/or gains) of ES in the future of the study area. With the VOTES framework, we aim at [1] incorporating stakeholders inputs to widen the valuation process and increase trust in policy-oriented approach; [2] integrating valuation of ES with a sustainable development stance accounting for land-use change; and [3] developing suggestions to policy-makers for integrating ES monitoring in policy developments.

Disciplines :

Environmental sciences & ecology

Author, co-author :

Fontaine, C.; University of Namur > Départment of Geography

Dendoncker, N.

De Vreese, R.

Jacquemin, Ingrid ; Université de Liège - ULiège > DER Sc. et gest. de l'environnement (Arlon Campus Environ.) > Agrométéorologie (relation agriculture-environ. physique)

Marek, Allyson ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Serv. d'étude en géographie éco. fond. et appliquée (Segefa)

Van Herzele, A.

Devillet, Guénaël ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Serv. d'étude en géographie éco. fond. et appliquée (Segefa)

Mortelmans, D.

François, Louis ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Modélisation du climat et des cycles biogéochimiques

Language :

English

Title :

Towards Participatory Integrated Valuation and Modelling of Ecosystem Services under Land-use Change

Publication date :

2014

Journal title :

Journal of Land Use Science

ISSN :

1747-423X

eISSN :

1747-4248

Publisher :

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Volume :

Pages :

278-303

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 26 February 2013

Statistics

Number of views

191 (54 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

9 (8 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322, 1115-1117.
Barnaud, C., Antona, M., & Marzin, J. (2011). Vers une mise en débat des incertitudes associées á la notion de service écosystémique. VertigO, 11(1), 24.
Biggs, D., Abel, N., Knight, A.T., Leitch, A., Langston, A., & Ban, N.C. (2011). The implementation crisis in conservation planning: could "mental models" help? Conservation Letters, 4, 169-183.
Blamey, R. K., & James, R. F. (1999), Citizens' juries - An alternative or an input to environmental cost-benefit analysis. Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Society for Ecological Economics (Brisbane, Australia), Griffith University.
Boumans, R., Costanza, R., Farley, J., Villa, F., & Wilson, M. (2002). Modeling the dynamics of the integrated earth system and the value of global ecosystem services using the GUMBO model. Ecological Economics, 41, 529-560.
Bousquet, F., Barreteau, O., Le Page, C., Mullon, C., & Weber, J. (1999). An environmental modelling approach: The use of multi-agent simulations. In F. Blasco (Ed.), Advances in environmental and ecological modelling (pp. 113-122. Paris: Elsevier.
Bousquet, F., & Le Page, C. (2004). Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: A review. Ecological modelling, 176, 313-332.
Bryan, B. A., Raymond, C. M., Crossman, N. D., & Macdonald, D. H. (2010). Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what, and how? Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 111-122.
Cast, A., MacDonald, D. H., Grandgirard, A., Kalivas, T., Strathearn, S., Sanderson, M., Frahm, D. (2008). South Australian Murray-Darling basin environmental values report. Australia: Water for a Healthy Country Flagship Report series. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
Castoldi, N., & Bechini, L. (2010). Integrated sustainability assessment of cropping systems with agro-ecological and economic indicators in northern Italy. European Journal of Agronomy, 32(1), 59-72.
Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal. World Development, 22, 953-956.
Coote, A., & Lenaghan, J. (1997). Citizen's juries: Theory into practice. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
Costanza, R. (2000). Social goals and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosystems, 3, 4-10.
Cowling, R., Egoh, B., Knight, A. T., O'Farrell, P. J., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Wilhelm-Rechman, A. 2008). An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(28), 9483-9488.
de Chazal, J., Quétier, F., Lavorel, S., & Van Doorn, A. (2008). Including multiple differing stakeholder values into vulnerability assessments of socio-ecological systems. Global Environmental Change, 18, 508-520.
de Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393-408.
Dury, M., Hambuckers, A., Warnant, P., Henrot, A., Favre, E., Ouberdous, M., François, L. 2011). Responses of European forest ecosystems to 21st century climate: Assessing changes in interannual variability and fire intensity. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 4, 82-89.
En Chee Y. (2004). An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 120, 549-565.
Fisher, B., Turner, R., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision-making. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643-653.
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S.,. Snyder, P. K. 2005). Global consequences of land-use. Science, 309, 570-574.
François, L., Delire, C., Warnant, P., & Munhoven, G. (1998). Modelling the glacial-interglacial changes in the continental biosphere. Global Planetary Change, 16, 37-52.
François, L., Goddéris, Y., Warnant, P., Ramstein, G., de Noblet, N., & Lorenz, S. (1999). Carbon stocks and isotopic budgets of the terrestrial biosphere at mid-Holocene and last glacial maximum times. Chemical Geology, 159, 163-189.
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1994). The worth of a songbird: Ecological economics as a postnormal science. Ecological Economics, 10(3), 197-207.
Gérard, J. -C., Nemry, B., François, L., & Warnant, P. (1999). The interannual change of atmospheric CO2: Contribution of subtropical ecosystems? Geophysical Research Letters, 26, 243-246.
Gilbert, N., & Bankes, S. (2002). Platforms and methods for agent-based modeling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(10), 7197-7198.
Haines Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2010). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In D. Raffaelli & C. Frid (Eds.), Ecosystem ecology: A new synthesis, BES Ecological Reviews Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanley, N. (2010). Why is it so difficult to measure the economic value of changes in "biodiversity"? Conference "Biodiversity: Basic Commodity or Luxury Item?" Leuven, Belgium.
Heal, G. (2000). Nature and the marketplace. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R. S., & van Ierland, E. C. (2006). Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57, 209-228.
Holcombe, R. (1983). Applied fairness theory: Comment. American Economic Revue, 73(5), 1153-1156.
Jacobs, M. (1997). Environmental valuation, deliberative democracy and public decision-making. In J. Fosterd.), Valuing nature: Economics, ethics and environment (pp. 211-231. London: Routlegde.
Kaplowitz, M. D., & Hoehn, J. (2001). Do focus groups and personal interviews reveal the same information for natural resource valuation? Ecological Economics, 36, 237-247.
Kuzel, A. J. (1999). Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In M. Crabtree & W. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L. I., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., Xu, J. 2001). The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11, 261-269.
Laurent, J.-M., Bar-Hen, A., François, L., Ghislain, M., & Cheddadi, R. (2004). Refining vegetation simulation models: From plant functional types to bioclimatic affinity groups of plants. Journal of Vegetation Science, 15, 739-746.
Laurent, J. -M., François, L., Bar-Hen, A., Bel, R., & Cheddadi, R. (2008). European Bioclimatic Affinity Groups: Data-model comparisons. Global Planetary Change, 61, 28-40.
Leeuwis, C. (2004), Communication for rural innovation - Rethinking agricultural extension. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
Limburg, K.E., O'Neil, R.V. Costanza, R., & Farber, S. (2002). Complex systems and valuation. Ecological Economics, 41, 409-420
MEA (2005). Millennium ecosystem assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Metzger, M. J., Rounsevell, M., Acosta-Michlik, L., Leemans, R., & Schroter, D. (2006). The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 114(1), 69-85.
Moons, E., Eggermont, K., Hermy, M., Proost, S., Nunes, P., Loomis, J., Van Ierland, E. 2000), Economische waardering van bossen: Een case-study van Heverleebos-Meerdaalwoud. Garant.
Murray-Rust, D., Dendoncker, N., Dawson, T., Acosta-Michlik, L., Karali, E., Guillem, E., Rounsevell, M. (2011). Conceptualising the analysis of socio-ecological systems through ecosystem services and agent based modelling. Journal of Land-use Science, 6(2), 83-99.
Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D. R., Shaw, M. R. (2009). Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1), 4-11.
Otto, D., Rasse, D., Kaplan, J., Warnant, P., & François, L. (2002). Biospheric carbon stocks reconstructed at the Last Glacial Maximum: Comparison between general circulation models using prescribed and computed sea surface temperatures. Global Planetary Change, 33, 117-138.
Parker, D. C., Manson, S. M., Janssen, M. A., Hoffmann, M. J., & Deadman, P. (2003). Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(2), 314-337.
Phan, D., & Amblard, F. (2007). Agent-based modelling and simulation in the social and human sciences. Oxford: The Bardwell Press.
Pope, J. (2003) Sustainability assessment: What is it and how do we do it, Murdoch University, Australia: Institute for Sustainability and Technology Policy.
Quetier, F., Lavorel, S., Thuiller, W., & Davies, I. (2007). Plant-trait-based modeling assessment of ecosystem-service sensitivity to land-use change. Ecological Applications, 17(8), 2377-2386.
Raymond, C. M., Bryan, B. A., MacDonald, D. H., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grandgirard, A., & Kalivas T. 2009). Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 68, 1301-1315.
Reginster, I., & Rounsevell, M. (2006). Scenarios of future urban land-use in Europe. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 33(4), 619-636.
Rounsevell, M. D. A., & Metzger, M. J. (2010). Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment. WIREs Climate Change, 1, 606-619.
Salverda, M. (2004). Analyse Coûts-Bénéfices Concepts-Clefs, ressource pédagogique préparée pour l'ICRA.
Schröter, D., Cramer, W., Leemans, R., Prentice, C., Arnell, A. W., Araujo, M. B.,Badeck, F. 2005). Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science, 310(5752), 1333-1337.
Slootweg, R., & van Beukering, P. (2008). Valuation of ecosystem services and strategic environmental assessment. Utrecht: Netherlands Commission for Environmental Assessment.
Steffen, W. (2009). Interdisciplinary research for managing ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 1301-1302.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods sampling in social and behavioural research. London: Sage.
TEEB (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Mainstreaming the economics of nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Nagoya: UN.
Treweek, J., Therivel, R., Thompson, S., & Slater, M. (2005). Strategic environmental assessment as a tool for promoting the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 7(2), 173-199.
Turner II, B. L., Skole, D. L., Sanderson, S., Fischer, G., Fresco, L. O., & Leemans, R. (1997). Land-use and land cover change. Earth Science Frontiers, 4, 26-33.
Van Herzele, A., Collins, K., & Tyrväinen, L. (2005). Involving people in urban forestry: A discussion of participatory practices throughout Europe. In C. C. Konijnendijk. K. Nilsson, T. B. Randrup, & J. Schipperijn (Eds.), Urban forests and trees in Europe. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Academic Publishers.
Van Herzele, A., & van Woerkum, C. M. J. (2008). Local knowledge in visually mediated practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27, 444-455.
Van Herzele, A., & van Woerkum, C. (2011). On the argumentative work of map-based visualisation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 396-399.
Verheem, R. (2002). Recommendations for sustainability assessment in the Netherlands. In Environmental impact assessment in the Netherlands. Views from the commission for EIA in 2002. The Netherlands: Commission for EIA.
Warnant, P., François, L., Strivay, D., & Gérard, J. -C. (1994). CARAIB: A global model of terrestrial biological productivity. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 8, 255-270.
Wilson, M. A., & Howarth, R. B. (2002). Distributional fairness and ecosystem service valuation. Ecological Economics, 41, 431-443.